Each time we take a turn in conversation we indicate what we know and what we think others know. However, knowledge is neither static nor absolute. It is shaped by those we interact with and governed by social norms - we monitor one another for whether we are fulfilling our rights and responsibilities with respect to knowledge, and for who has relatively more rights to assert knowledge over some state of affairs. This book brings together an international team of leading linguists, sociologists and anthropologists working across a range of European and Asian languages to document some of the ways in which speakers manage the moral domain of knowledge in conversation. The volume demonstrates that if we are to understand how speakers manage issues of agreement, affiliation and alignment - something clearly at the heart of human sociality - we must understand the social norms surrounding epistemic access, primacy and responsibilities.
1 Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction
PART II Affiliational consequences of managing epistemic asymmetries
2 The management of knowledge discrepancies and of epistemic changes in institutional interactions
3 Claiming epistemic primacy: yo-marked assessments in Japanese
4 Morality and question design: "of course" as contesting a presupposition of askability
5 Addressing epistemic incongruence in question-answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs
6 The epistemics of make-believe
PART III Epistemic resources for managing affiliation and alignment
7 Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: empathic moments in interaction
8 The terms of not knowing
9 Proposing shared knowledge as a means of pursuing agreement
10 Ways of agreeing with negative stance taking
11 Epistemics and embodiment in the interactions of very youg children
PART IV Toward a framework
12 Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: enchrony, status, knowledge and agency
N. J. Enfield
Tanya Stivers is an Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Los Angeles and a scientific staff member of the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Lorenza Mondada is a Professor in the Department of Linguistics at the University of Lyon II, and Director of the ICAR Research Laboratory (CNRS, University of Lyon). Jakob Steensig is an Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at Aarhus University, Denmark.
Juhul, kui teie arvates võiks see raamat olla müügis ka Tartu Ülikooli Raamatupoes või soovite lihtsalt raamatuga enne ostu tutvuda, siis palun sisestaga allpool oma nimi ning e-mail. Võimaluse korral tellime raamatu poodi ning teavitame ka teid, kui raamat on müügile jõudnud.
The importance of emotion in everyday interactions has become a central topic of research in a wide variety of disciplines, including linguistics, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and communication. Emotion in Interaction offers a...
(Ilmumisaeg: 27-Sep-2012, Hardback, Kirjastus: Oxford University Press Inc, ISBN-13: 9780199730735)
All communication involves acts of stance, in which speakers take up positions vis-a-vis the expressive, referential, interactional and social implications of their speech. This book brings together contributions in a new and dynamic current of acade...
(Ilmumisaeg: 25-Oct-2012, Paperback, Kirjastus: Oxford University Press Inc, ISBN-13: 9780199860555)
Much of everyday work is done through talk between practitioner and client. Conversation Analysis is the close inspection of peoples use of language in interaction. The work reported in this collection shows how Conversation Analysis can be use...
This engaging text explores how everyday talk--the ordinary kinds of communicating that people do in schools, workplaces, and among family and friends--expresses who we are and who we want to be. The authors interweave rhetorical and cultural pe...
`Identity' attracts some of social science's liveliest and most passionate debates. Theory abounds on matters as disparate as nationhood, ethnicity, gender politics and culture. However, there is considerably less investigation into how suc...