Prehistory of the Balto-Slavic Accent [Kõva köide]

Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 100,78 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 125,97 €
  • Säästad 20%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 2-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
Prehistory of the Balto-Slavic AccentSuurem pilt
Teised raamatud teemal:
Teised raamatud sellest sooduspakkumisest: Kevadine sooduspakkumine - kuni 17. maini üle miljoni raamatu kuni 25% soodsamalt
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9789004346093.html
The Prehistory of the Balto-Slavic Accent has been written to fill a gap. The interested non-specialist can easily learn about the complex accent systems of the individual Baltic and Slavic languages and how they relate to each other. But the reader interested in the Proto-Balto-Slavic parent system, and how it evolved from the very different system of Proto-Indo-European, has few reliable places to turn. The goal of this book is to provide an accentological interface between Indo-European and Balto-Slavicto identify and explain the accent shifts and other early changes that give the earliest stages of Baltic and Slavic their distinctive prosodic cast.

Arvustused

"In sum, Jasanoffs opus can take its rightful place alongside works such as Stang 1957 as being essential reading in the field of BS accentology for a long time to come." - Jean-François Mondon, Minot State University, on: Linguistlist.org.

Preface xi
List of Abbreviations
xiv
1 The Indo-European Background
1(30)
1.1 Proto-Indo-European
2(5)
1.1.1 The Segmental Inventory
2(2)
1.1.2 Accent and Ablaut
4(3)
1.2 Indo-Iranian
7(3)
1.2.1 Udatta and svarita
7(1)
1.2.2 Paradigmatic Mobility
8(1)
1.2.3 Distractable Long Vowels
9(1)
1.3 Greek
10(5)
1.3.1 Acute and Circumflex
10(2)
1.3.2 The Law of Limitation
12(1)
1.3.3 Final -ai and -oi
13(1)
1.3.4 Paradigmatic Mobility in Greek
14(1)
1.4 Anatolian
15(1)
1.5 Germanic
16(4)
1.5.1 Bimoric and Trimoric Vowels
16(3)
1.5.2 Verner Doublets
19(1)
1.6 Accent and Ablaut in Secondary Derivation
20(4)
1.6.1 Internal Derivation
20(2)
1.6.2 External Derivation
22(2)
1.7 Theoretical Issues
24(7)
1.7.1 The Generative-compositional Approach
24(2)
1.7.2 Discussion
26(3)
1.7.3 Conclusion
29(2)
2 Balto-Slavic: The Descriptive Picture
31(43)
2.1 Lithuanian
32(10)
2.1.1 Acute and Circumflex
32(2)
2.1.2 Acuteness as a Property of Morphemes
34(2)
2.1.3 The Autonomy of Acuteness
36(2)
2.1.4 Saussure's Law
38(1)
2.1.5 Mobility
39(2)
2.1.6 Zemaitian
41(1)
2.1.7 Summary
42(1)
2.2 Slavic
42(20)
2.2.1 Rising and Falling Accents
43(2)
2.2.2 Enclinomena
45(1)
2.2.3 Stang
45(1)
2.2.3.1 Accent Paradigm a
46(1)
2.2.3.2 Accent Paradigm c and Meillet's Law
47(3)
2.2.3.3 Accent Paradigm b
50(2)
2.2.4 Dybo's Law
52(3)
2.2.5 Lexical vs. Left-marginal Accent
55(1)
2.2.6 The Autonomy of Acuteness in Slavic
56(3)
2.2.7 Componential Interpretation of the Slavic Accents
59(2)
2.2.8 Slavic vs. Lithuanian
61(1)
2.3 Latvian and Old Prussian
62(5)
2.3.1 Latvian
62(2)
2.3.2 Old Russian
64(3)
2.4 Conclusion: Proto-Balto-Slavic
67(7)
2.4.1 Accent
67(3)
2.4.2 Acuteness
70(2)
2.4.3 Summary
72(2)
3 The Origin of Acuteness
74(30)
3.1 The Scope of the Problem
74(2)
3.2 Jasanoff 2004: Acuteness from Length
76(4)
3.2.1 Balto-Slavic and Germanic
76(2)
3.2.2 Acute vs. Non-acute Diphthongs
78(2)
3.3 Kortlandt: Acuteness from Glottalic Contact
80(3)
3.4 The Treatment of Inherent Long Vowels
83(14)
3.4.1 Metatonie Douce
83(3)
3.4.2 Vrddhi and Narten Derivation
86(3)
3.4.3 Final Syllables
89(2)
3.4.4 Diphthongal Endings
91(4)
3.4.5 Monosyllables
95(2)
3.5 Acute vs. Circumflex in Verbal Forms
97(5)
3.5.1 BCS donijeh, umrijeh, zakleh, rijeh
97(2)
3.5.2 PSL *da, Lith. duos
99(2)
3.5.3 Lith. gere vs. bere
101(1)
3.6 Summary
102(2)
4 Mobility and the Left-Marginal Accent
104(27)
4.1 Post-mobility Accent Shifts: Hirt's Law
105(3)
4.2 Theories of Mobility
108(7)
4.2.1 Saussure 1896
108(1)
4.2.2 Oxytonicity and Mobility
109(2)
4.2.3 Evaluation
111(2)
4.2.4 Olander 2009
113(2)
4.3 Toward a New Theory
115(3)
4.3.1 Verbs
115(2)
4.3.2 The Structure of a Theory of Mobility
117(1)
4.4 Saussure-Pedersen's Law
118(8)
4.4.1 Saussure Revisited
118(2)
4.4.2 The "Obstacles"
120(2)
4.4.3 The Rule
122(3)
4.4.4 Phonetics and Phonology of SPL
125(1)
4.5 Proto-Vasil'ev-Dolobko's Law
126(5)
4.5.1 Word Length and Accent Placement
126(2)
4.5.2 The Rule and Its Effects
128(1)
4.5.3 The Origin of VDL
129(2)
5 Mobility in Nominal Forms
131(49)
5.1 a-, i-, and u-stems: The Light Cases
131(10)
5.1.1 The Common Curve
131(2)
5.1.2 Nominative Singular (x..x)
133(1)
5.1.3 Genitive Singular (x..x)
133(1)
5.1.4 Dative Singular (x..x)
134(1)
5.1.5 Accusative Singular (x..x)
135(2)
5.1.6 Locative Singular (x..x)
137(1)
5.1.7 Nominative Plural (x..x)
138(1)
5.1.8 Accusative Plural (x..x)
139(1)
5.1.9 Nominative-accusative Dual (x..x)
140(1)
5.2 Masculine o-stems: The Light Cases
141(6)
5.2.1 Forms Conforming to the Normal Curve
141(1)
5.2.2 Forms Not Conforming to the Normal Curve
142(1)
5.2.2.1 o-stem Genitive Singular (x..x)
142(1)
5.2.2.2 o-stem Locative Singular (x..x)
143(1)
5.2.2.3 o-stem Nominative Plural (x..x)
144(3)
5.2.3 Summary: The Masculine o-stem Curve (Light Cases)
147(1)
5.3 The Heavy Cases
147(11)
5.3.1 Proto-VDL in nouns
147(4)
5.3.2 Genitive Plural (x..x)
151(1)
5.3.3 Dative Plural (x..x)
152(1)
5.3.4 Instrumental Plural (x..x)
153(1)
5.3.5 Locative Plural (x..x)
154(1)
5.3.6 Dative and Instrumental Dual (x..x)
155(1)
5.3.7 Addendum: the Instrumental Singular
156(2)
5.4 Neuters
158(11)
5.4.1 o-stems
158(1)
5.4.1.1 The Nom.-Acc. Endings
158(1)
5.4.1.2 The Treatment of Oxytone Neuters
159(3)
5.4.1.3 Illic-Svityc's Law
162(2)
5.4.1.4 Root-accented o-stem Neuters
164(1)
5.4.1.5 Summary: Accent and Gender in Non-acute o-stems in Slavic
165(1)
5.4.2 Neuter Consonant Stems
166(3)
5.5 Pronouns
169(3)
5.5.1 Demonstratives
169(1)
5.5.2 Personal Pronouns
170(2)
5.6 Valency
172(8)
5.6.1 Dominant vs. Recessive
172(2)
5.6.2 Secondary Derivatives
174(2)
5.6.3 The Derivational Accent Rule
176(3)
5.6.4 Valency: Summary
179(1)
6 Mobility in the Verb
180(51)
6.1 Overview
180(2)
6.2 Thematic Presents
182(17)
6.2.1 The Simple Thematic Type
183(1)
6.2.1.1 Explaining Mobility
183(3)
6.2.1.2 The Accentuation of the Optative
186(2)
6.2.1.3 The Extension of the Mobile Pattern
188(1)
6.2.1.4 Tudati-presents and Thematic Barytonization
189(3)
6.2.2 Extended Thematic Presents
192(1)
6.2.2.1 Nasal Presents
192(2)
6.2.2.2 The Baltic Presents in -sta-
194(1)
6.2.2.3 Presents in *-ie/o-
195(3)
6.2.3 Thematic Presents: Summary
198(1)
6.3 "Semithematic" Presents in Baltic
199(8)
6.3.1 The Baltic Presents in *-a-
200(1)
6.3.2 The Baltic Presents in *-i-
201(4)
6.3.3 Immobility in i-presents
205(2)
6.4 The Slavic type in *-i-, inf. *-iti
207(10)
6.4.1 The "Regular" Forms
207(2)
6.4.2 AP b, vs. b2
209(3)
6.4.3 "Poluotmetnost"
212(3)
6.4.4 The Origin of AP b2
215(2)
6.5 Athematic Presents
217(3)
6.6 Beyond the Present System
220(11)
6.6.1 Mobility and Valency in the Slavic Verb
220(1)
6.6.2 The Infinitive and Supine
221(2)
6.6.3 The Aorist
223(3)
6.6.4 Participles
226(3)
6.6.5 Baltic
229(2)
7 Summary
231(4)
7.1 From pie to Proto-Balto-Slavic
231(2)
7.2 From Proto-Balto-Slavic to the Later Languages
233(2)
Appendix: Glossary of Terms 235(3)
Bibliography 238(13)
Index of Forms Cited 251
Jay Jasanoff, Ph.D. (1968), Harvard University, is Diebold Professor of Indo-European Linguistics and Philology at Harvard. He is best known for his work on IE verbal morphology, especially Hittite and the Indo-European Verb (Oxford, 2003).