|
|
xi | |
|
|
xv | |
|
|
xvii | |
|
|
xix | |
|
SECTION 1 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY: SETTING THE SCENE |
|
|
1 | (30) |
|
Doing qualitative research: Initial questions |
|
|
3 | (6) |
|
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Conducting qualitative research: Quandaries and uncertainties |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
The structure of the book |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Introduction to qualitative psychological research |
|
|
9 | (22) |
|
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Epistemology and the `scientific method' |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
Resistance to the `scientific method': Alternative epistemologies |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
Contextualized understandings through qualitative psychology |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
Evaluative criteria for qualitative research |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
Areas for future development in qualitative psychology |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
Guarding against `methodolatry' and advocating methodological flexibility in qualitative research |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
SECTION 2 APPROACHES TO DATA ANALYSIS |
|
|
31 | (144) |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
|
Interpretative phenomenological analysis |
|
|
35 | (16) |
|
|
|
Theoretical underpinnings |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Research questions, sampling and data collection |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
Semi-structured interviewing |
|
|
41 | (4) |
|
The continuum of interviewing styles |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Constructing the interview schedule |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (4) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis |
|
|
51 | (14) |
|
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Stage 1: Initial readings of the transcript |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Stage 2: Identifying and labelling themes |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Stage 3: Linking themes and identifying thematic clusters |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Stage 4: Producing a summary table of themes with illustrative quotations |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Presentation of the analysis in narrative form |
|
|
59 | (5) |
|
Theme 1: What the army gave David |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
Theme 2: What the army took away from David |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
Theme 3: The end of a relationship |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (22) |
|
|
The origins of grounded theory |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
Different versions of grounded theory: Variations on a theme |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Method and methodological issues |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
Types of research questions |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
When to use grounded theory? |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
When to review the literature? |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
How to collect suitable data? |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Timing of data collection |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Stance of researcher to participants and data |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Data preparation: Transformation of data |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
To transcribe or not? Types of transcription |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
Use of computer software to assist analysis |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (5) |
|
Initial coding and the constant comparison technique |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Theoretical sampling and axial coding |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Development of new theory |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Testing of emerging theory |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
How to assess the quality of a grounded theory analysis? |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
Writing-up and presentation |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (11) |
|
|
|
|
87 | (3) |
|
Characteristics of the sample |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Strengths and weaknesses of the approach |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (19) |
|
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Assumptions, approaches and applications |
|
|
99 | (6) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Techniques of discourse analysis |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
Evaluating discourse analytic work |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (14) |
|
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
|
120 | (9) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Practice and subjectivities |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (14) |
|
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
Social constructionist approaches and the study of self/identity |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Problems with social constructionist approaches: `Losing the subject' |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
Narrative psychology and the study of self/identity |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
The central role of language and stories |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Research questions and potential sources of data |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
A method for exploring personal narratives |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
Autobiographical interview protocol |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
Step 1: Reading and familiarizing |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Step 2: Identifying important concepts to look for |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Step 3: Identifying `narrative tone' |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Step 4: Identifying `imagery' and `themes' |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Step 5: Weaving all of this together into a coherent story |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Step 6: Writing up as a research report |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Reflections on the analytic process |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Methodological considerations |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
145 | (13) |
|
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (3) |
|
Sutures and stitches in the group process |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
Scene 2: Ghost town and Civvie Street |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Scene 3: David's voicings |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
Interpretation after performance |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Analysing qualitative data: Comparative reflections |
|
|
158 | (17) |
|
|
Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of the four analytic approaches |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
The role of the researcher |
|
|
161 | (8) |
|
Taking into account the researcher's theoretical knowledge and biographical experiences |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
|
164 | (5) |
|
Evaluating the four analytic approaches |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (26) |
|
|
176 | (3) |
|
|
Interview transcript: David |
|
|
179 | (10) |
|
Interview transcript: Brian |
|
|
189 | (12) |
|
APPENDIX 2 REPORTING QUALITATIVE RESEARCH |
|
|
201 | (4) |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
|
|
Report 1 Making sense of anger: A case study using interpretative phenomenological analysis |
|
|
205 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
208 | (4) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
`I think I got depressed' |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
Report 2 Critical care experiences and bereavement among families of organ donors: A reflective account of grounded theory analysis |
|
|
217 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
|
221 | (6) |
|
Deciding - donation decisions |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Parting - what do I do now? |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
Coping - dealing with grief and donation |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Theory of dissonant loss: Conflict and resolution in the donation experience |
|
|
227 | (4) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
Report 3 Counselling psychologists' talk about `psychopathology' and diagnostic categories: A reflective account of a discourse analytic study |
|
|
235 | (13) |
|
|
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
|
239 | (6) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (4) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
246 | (2) |
|
Report 4 Adapting to life with oral cancer: A reflective account of a narrative analytic study |
|
|
248 | (10) |
|
|
|
248 | (2) |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
Analysis: The patient's `timetable' |
|
|
250 | (3) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
Learning to live in `therapeutic emplotment' |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
In limbo: `Holding one's breath' |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
Recurrence: `Therapeutic emplotment' continued |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
Through the mirror: The `unspoken narrative' |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
Reflections on methodological and theoretical issues |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
References |
|
258 | (11) |
Name Index |
|
269 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
273 | |