|
|
11 | (8) |
|
1.1 Defining Applicative Arguments |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
1.2 Goals and Structure of this Book |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (10) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
2.4 Pylkkanen (2002, 2008) |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
29 | (60) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
3.2 Distinguishing Affected Experiencers |
|
|
30 | (6) |
|
3.2.1 Benefactives (Chapter 5) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Part-Whole Applicative Arguments (Chapter 6) & Pertinence Datives |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
3.2.3 Other German Applicatives |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
3.3 At-Issue and Not-At-Issue Meaning |
|
|
36 | (4) |
|
3.3.1 Affected Experiencers |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (16) |
|
|
50 | (6) |
|
|
56 | (9) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (7) |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (5) |
|
3.8 Affected Experiencers following Potts (2005) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.9 Digression: Parametric Variation of Aff |
|
|
73 | (14) |
|
3.9.1 Japanese: Attachment Height Variation |
|
|
73 | (5) |
|
3.9.2 Not-At-Issue Affected Experiencers |
|
|
78 | (8) |
|
3.9.3 Parametric Variation |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
4 Not-At-Issue Applicative Arguments |
|
|
89 | (30) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (12) |
|
|
90 | (6) |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
4.3 Subject Co-Referential Applicative Arguments |
|
|
101 | (14) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
4.3.4 Role of the Direct Object |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
4.3.5 Not-At-Issue Meaning |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
4.4 Not-At-Issue Applicatives |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
|
119 | (29) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
119 | (5) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
5.4 True Applicative Benefactives |
|
|
125 | (10) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (3) |
|
5.4.3 Verbal Restrictions |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
5.5 Recipient Benefactives |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Ditransitives and Benefactives |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
5.6 Prepositional Alternation |
|
|
140 | (7) |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
6 Part-Whole Applicatives |
|
|
148 | (30) |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
|
150 | (8) |
|
6.2.1 Differentiating Part-Whole Applicative Arguments |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
6.2.3 Restrictions on Part-Whole Applicative Arguments |
|
|
154 | (4) |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (14) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
|
163 | (4) |
|
6.4.4 Tomioka and Sim (2007) |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
|
170 | (5) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (10) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (3) |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
8 Co-Occurrence of Applicatives |
|
|
188 | (15) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (12) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
8.2.3 Subject Co-referential Applicative |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
8.2.4 Affected Experiencer |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
8.2.6 Part-Whole Applicative |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (4) |
Appendix 1 Affected Experiencers |
|
207 | (6) |
Appendix 2 Not-At-Issue Applicatives |
|
213 | (2) |
Appendix 3 Benefactives |
|
215 | (6) |
Appendix 4 Part-Whole Applicative |
|
221 | (4) |
Appendix 5 Dative of Inaction |
|
225 | (2) |
Glossary |
|
227 | (4) |
Bibliography |
|
231 | (8) |
Index |
|
239 | |