|
|
|
xi | |
|
|
|
xvii | |
| Preface |
|
xxxiii | |
| Abbreviations |
|
xxxix | |
| Notes on contributors |
|
xlvii | |
|
1 EU private law and the CISG: An introduction |
|
|
1 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
2 EU private law and the national private law systems |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
3 The forty years of the CISG |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
PART I EU private law and the national private law systems |
|
|
13 | (128) |
|
2 Implementing Directive 2019/770/EU on Contracts for the Supply of Digital Content and Services: A common law perspective |
|
|
15 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
2 The key provisions of the Digital Content and Services Directive (DCSD) |
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.1.1 Contracts to supply digital content or services in exchange for personal data |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 Distinguishing the DCSD from the SGD |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
2.2 Conformity of the digital content or service with the contract |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.3 Remedies for lack of conformity |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
3 Leaving the EU: the DCSD and the UK Consumer Rights Act 2015 |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
3.1 Key differences between the CRA 2015 and the DCSD |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
3.1.1 No provision for digital services |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 No provision for contracts to supply digital content in return for personal data |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 Overlap between goods and digital content |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.1.4 Conformity provisions based on the Sale of Goods Act 1979 |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
3.1.5 Remedies influenced by EU law but no right to termination |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
3.2 Lessons to be learnt? |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
4 Remaining in the EU: the DCSD and Irish consumer law |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
4.2 Implementing the DCSD |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
3 Aggressive practices and consumer credit in the EU |
|
|
37 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2 Rationales for financial regulation |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
3 EU banking and credit regulation and aggressive practices |
|
|
41 | (17) |
|
3.1 UCPD and aggressive practices |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.2 Distance Marketing of Consumer Financial Services Directive |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
3.3 Consumer Credit Directive |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
3.4 Mortgage Credit Directive |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
3.5 Payment Services Directive |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
3.6 Payment Accounts Directive |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
4 Challenges of cross-border enforcement of consumer law: Unfair contract terms |
|
|
61 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
2 Private enforcement: individual claims |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
3 Collective redress: injunctions and representative actions |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
|
|
66 | (4) |
|
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
5 Unfair contract terms relating to late payment in commercial transactions: The Late Payment Directive and its transposition into Croatian law |
|
|
73 | (31) |
|
|
|
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
2 The concept of commercial transactions in the LPD 2011 |
|
|
77 | (6) |
|
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
2.1.1 The notion of `public authority' |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 The notion of `undertaking' |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
2.2.1 The concepts of `delivery of goods' and `provision of services' |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 The concept of `remuneration' |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Contracts and contract-like relationships |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3 Unfair contract terms regime in the LPD 2011 |
|
|
83 | (10) |
|
3.1 Scope of the substantive fairness control |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
3.2 Function of the substantive fairness control |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.3 The meaning of `grossly unfair' |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.3.1 `Crossly unfair' vs `unfair' |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 An indicator of unfairness or a general clause? |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 A gross deviation from `good commercial practice' contrary to `good faith and fair dealing' |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
3.4 Black and grey letter rules |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
3.5 Means to prevent the continued use of grossly unfair terms and practices |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
4 Unfair contract terms relating to late payment in Croatian law |
|
|
93 | (7) |
|
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
4.2 Invalidity of grossly unfair contract terms |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
4.2.1 List of prohibited contract terms and practices |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
4.3 Representative action |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
|
|
101 | (3) |
|
6 Full freedom of contract in commercial agency law: A road less travelled |
|
|
104 | (21) |
|
|
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
2 Freedom of contract under Danish, Estonian, and German law |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
3 Freedom of contract and the Commercial Agency Directive: a matter of scope |
|
|
108 | (9) |
|
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
3.3.1 The diverging doctrinal views |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 The ECJ on the Directive's territorial scope |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.2 Case C-507/15 Agro Foreign Trade & Agency Ltd v Petersime NV |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 The aftermath of Agro Foreign Trade & Agency |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.2 New questions raised |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.2.1 Mixed contracts |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.2.2 Contractual vs actual place of performance |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.2.3 Narrow vs broad definition of `establishment' |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
3.3.3.2.4 The (non-)exhaustive character of the Agro-Criteria |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
4 Compatibility of existing rules on freedom of contract with the Directive |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
5.2 Indirect consequences |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
5.2.1 Option 1: no additional freedom of contract |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Option 2: full freedom of contract |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
5.2.3 Option 3: limited freedom of contract |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
7 Comparative perspectives on disgorgement of profits in tort and contract |
|
|
125 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
2 Disgorgement in contract |
|
|
126 | (7) |
|
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
|
|
136 | (5) |
|
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
PART II The forty years of the CISG |
|
|
141 | (47) |
|
8 Auctions and auctionlike selling mechanisms in international sale of goods: A call for revisiting Article 2(b) CISG? |
|
|
143 | (19) |
|
|
|
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
3 New circumstances and the need for autonomous interpretation of the term `auction' |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
4 Autonomous interpretation |
|
|
146 | (12) |
|
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
4.2 `Sale by auction' or `sale at auction'? |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
4.3 Auctionlike selling methods |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Commodity exchanges |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
4.4 Teleological approach |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
4.4.1 Internet auctions as `local transaction' |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 Unpredictability of internet auction |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 Electronic reverse auction |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
4.6 Systematic approach within the ambit of uniform law |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
4.7 Implications of the proposed autonomous concept for the Croatian sales law |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
5 Revision of Art 2(b) CISC |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
|
158 | (4) |
|
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
9 Relieving the contract of problems that reservations create under Articles 12 and 96 CISG: Can Article 13 CISG operate as a self-help mechanism? |
|
|
162 | (15) |
|
|
|
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
1.1 The CISC as a successful instrument of unification: overcoming the impossible |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
1.2 The presentation of the problem |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
2 Preserving the international soul of the CISG through autonomous interpretation |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
3 Liberating the contract from domestic form requirements: the principle of freedom of form |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
4 Reserving the freedom of form: Article 96 CISG |
|
|
167 | (7) |
|
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
4.2 The sphere of application |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
4.2.1 The sphere of application as to the types of contractual declarations |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 The sphere of application as to the types of form requirements |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
4.3 The controversial legal effects of the reservation as to the determination of the law governing the form |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 The proposed solution: Article 13 CISG |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.2 Applying Article 13 CISG as a self-help mechanism |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
10 International versus domestic? The question of the applicability of intellectual property law to the CISG |
|
|
177 | (11) |
|
|
|
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
2 Intellectual property rights under the CISG |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
3 The CISG's preference of the term `industrial property or other intellectual property' |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
4 The notion of `industrial property or other intellectual property' |
|
|
181 | (6) |
|
4.1 International character of the CISG as the standard for interpreting industrial or other intellectual property |
|
|
181 | (4) |
|
4.2 Uniform application of the CISG as the standard for interpreting industrial or other intellectual property |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
|
|
187 | (1) |
| Bibliography |
|
188 | (3) |
| Index |
|
191 | |