|
|
xix | |
|
|
xxv | |
|
|
xxxv | |
Foreword |
|
xxxix | |
|
Introduction |
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
|
PART I LAND TITLE SECURITY: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT ISSUES |
|
|
|
Chapter 1 Title Guarantee Or Title Indefeasibility? |
|
|
9 | (19) |
|
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
1.2 Title by registration, Torrens title and title guarantee |
|
|
12 | (4) |
|
1.3 Indefeasibility or title guarantee |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
1.4 What title guarantee means in practice |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
1.6 What does it all mean? |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
Chapter 2 Fraud And Torrens |
|
|
28 | (10) |
|
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.2 Torrens in the wider legal world |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.3 Other complexities in the general law |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2.4 Assets Co Ltd v Mere Roihi |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
2.5 Ten points of principle |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2.6 Fraud and the Land Transfer Act 2017 (NZ) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Chapter 3 In Personam Claims: Developments And Thoughts |
|
|
38 | (19) |
|
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3.2 Before the Torrens system K |
|
|
39 | (4) |
|
3.2.1 Early English property law |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 The social context and philosophical attitudes which inspired Robert Torrens |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
3.3.1 Destruction of old norms |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
3.3.2 Indefeasibility's imperfection |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (9) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
3.4.3 Intermediate approaches |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
3.5 Conclusion: the in personam crossroads |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Chapter 4 Indefeasibility Of Title: Law Reform In Scotland And New Zealand |
|
|
57 | (17) |
|
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
4.1.2 And some differences |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
4.1.3 Scope of this chapter |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
4.1.4 Three versions of registration of title |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (5) |
|
4.2.1 `No-consent' instruments |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
4.2.2 Professor Mapp's insight |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
4.2.3 The law reform question |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.3 Law reform: constraints and opportunities |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.5 Some comparative reflections |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
Chapter 5 Recent Developments In The Torrens System In Australia |
|
|
74 | (16) |
|
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
5.2 The (partial) assault on immediate indefeasibility |
|
|
74 | (4) |
|
5.3 Ebb and flow in the judicial approach to overriding statutes |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
5.4 Judicial approaches to overriding statutes |
|
|
79 | (7) |
|
5.4.1 The orthodox position |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Post-Breskvar v Wall privileging of the Torrens system |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
5.4.3 Change of Direction: Hillpalm v Heaven's Door and Horvath v Commonwealth Bank |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
5.4.4 Raising the bar for overriding statutes |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
5.5 E-conveyancing and transition to a national conveyancing law |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
5.6 The `privatisation' of Torrens title registers |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
Chapter 6 Reform Of The New Zealand Land Transfer Act |
|
|
90 | (16) |
|
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
6.2 The steering committee |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
6.4 The Commission's report |
|
|
94 | (9) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Indefeasibility and its exceptions |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 Alteration of the register by the High Court |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
6.4.4 Checking the identity of a mortgagor |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
6.4.5 A definition of fraud |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
6.4.6 Protection of unregistered interests |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
6.4.7 Registration of trusts |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
6.4.10 Overriding statutes |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
6.4.11 Covenants in gross |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
6.5.1 Exposure draft and Bill |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
6.5.3 Supplementary order paper |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
6.5.4 Third reading and commencement |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
6.5.5 The Supreme Court speaks |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
6.5.6 The consequences for covenants |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Chapter 7 The New Fraud Test And Manifest Injustice |
|
|
106 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
7.3 An aversion to defining fraud |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
7.4 The Law Commission's definitions of fraud |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
7.5 Why did the Law Commission want to define fraud? |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
7.6.1 A definition incorporating judicial interpretations of fraud? |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
7.6.2 Fraud against an unregistered interest holder |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
7.7.1 A definition incorporating judicial interpretations of fraud |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
7.7.2 Fraud against the holder of an unregistered interest |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
7.7.4 Fraud against a registered estate or interest |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
7.7.5 But an honest transaction is still relevant to determining fraud |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
7.8 The definition of fraud as enacted |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
7.9 Section 6(1): the general definition |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
7.10 Section 6(2): fraud must be against the registered owner of an estate or interest in land, or against the owner of an unregistered interest |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
7.11 The `manifest injustice' test |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
7.12.1 Indefeasibility meaning |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
7.13 How the manifest injustice process is intended to work |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
7.13.2 What does `void or voidable' mean? |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
7.13.3 What is a void transaction? |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
7.13.4 Voidable transactions and equitable priorities |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
7.13.5 Nemo dat principles and the effect of equities on Torrens precepts |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
7.13.6 When must the proceedings be commenced? |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
7.14 What does manifest injustice mean? |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
7.14.2 The relevance of damages |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
7.15 Grounds for overturning registration |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
7.15.1 Suggested groupings |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
7.15.2 Statutory illegality |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
7.15.3 Personal circumstances |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
7.15.4 The nature of the interest |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (3) |
|
7.16.1 Double up with land transfer fraud findings and in personam rights |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
7.16.2 Was creating a list a good idea? |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
7.16.3 Restrictive use of discretion |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
7.17 Does the test create a chilling effect on our understanding of indefeasibility? |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
7.17.1 The effect on practitioners |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
7.18 Risk analyses and public policy |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Chapter 8 Knocking At The Compensation Door: What Might A Deprived Owner Expect Under The Land Transfer Act 2017? |
|
|
132 | (16) |
|
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
8.2 Compensation for loss or damage resulting from a registrar's error or from system failure |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
8.3 Compensation for loss of an estate or interest in land |
|
|
134 | (4) |
|
8.3.1 Section 59 of the LTA 2017 |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Sections 64-70 of the LTA 2017 |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
8.4 Case study: Burmeister v Registrar-General of Land - what would be different under the LTA 2017? |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
8.4.1 Deprived of land; barred from the Act |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
8.4.2 Date from which compensation should be calculated |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Measure of damages/interest |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
8.5 An owner deprived by the operation of the manifest injustice principle - how might compensation be calculated? |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
8.5.1 The `manifest injustice' principle |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
8.5.2 Compensation for person A and for person B: two sides of the same coin? |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
8.5.3 The guidelines for a manifest injustice order - potential for carelessness |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
8.5.4 What happens when a careless person B, deprived of an estate or interest in land, applies for compensation? |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
8.5.5 What if person B is a mortgagee? |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.6 Loss or damage occurring after search and before registration |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
8.7 Exceptions to compensation and procedural provisions |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
8.7.1 Exceptions to compensation |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
8.7.2 Notice and consideration of claim |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
8.7.3 Subrogation; compensation recoverable by Crown as debt |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
8.7.4 No limitation provision |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
Chapter 9 The Registrar's Powers In The Digital Age |
|
|
148 | (24) |
|
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
9.2 The traditional approach to the registrar's powers |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
9.2.1 LTA 1952, section 80 and its equivalents |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 LTA 1952, section 81(1) and its equivalents |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
9.2.3 The approach pre-Frazer v Walker in Australia and Canada |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
9.3 Frazer v Walker and the `significant and extensive' powers debate |
|
|
152 | (6) |
|
9.3.1 New Zealand case law since Frazer v Walker |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
9.3.2 Australian and Canadian case law since Frazer v Walker |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
9.4 The exercise of the registrar's powers following automation of the register |
|
|
158 | (6) |
|
9.4.1 Developments in New Zealand |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
9.4.2 Developments in Australia and Canada |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
9.5 New Zealand's reform of the registrar's powers under the LTA 2017 |
|
|
164 | (5) |
|
9.5.1 New Zealand Law Commission reports |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
9.5.2 The registrar's powers under the LTA 2017 |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
9.5.3 What types of `error' are contemplated under section 21(1)? |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
9.5.4 Are subsequent bona fide purchasers or mortgagees protected against alteration? |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
9.5.5 When is a registered interest or estate `materially affect[ ed]'? |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
9.5.6 What of equitable interests? |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
9.5.7 Challenging the registrar's decisions under section 21 |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
9.5.8 Will section 21 change the registrar's practice from under the LTA 1952? |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
9.6 Looking ahead - delegation of the registrar's powers and the potential for privatisation |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
Chapter 10 Making Personal Obligations Binding: Covenants In Gross And Encumbrances Under New Zealand's New Land Transfer Act |
|
|
172 | (17) |
|
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
10.2 Conceptual frameworks |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
10.3 Land covenants under New Zealand law |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
10.6 Questions and issues |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
10.6.3 Legislative change |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (4) |
|
PART II AUTOMATION OF LAND REGISTRATION SYSTEMS |
|
|
|
Chapter 11 Automation, The Land Registration Act (England And Wales) And The Future |
|
|
189 | (19) |
|
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
11.2 Automated conveyancing |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
11.3 The past and possible future (level 3) |
|
|
192 | (4) |
|
11.3.1 The LRA 2002 framework provisions |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 The framework provisions and equitable intervention |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
11.4 The present (level 1) |
|
|
196 | (4) |
|
11.4.1 The significance of separate switch on and switch off powers |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
11.4.2 Contracts for sale of land |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
11.5 The future (level 2) |
|
|
200 | (6) |
|
11.5.1 Simultaneous completion and registration |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
11.5.2 Implementing electronic conveyancing |
|
|
201 | (3) |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
11.6 Conclusion: level 4? |
|
|
206 | (2) |
|
Chapter 12 Automation Of A Torrens Register: An Australian Perspective |
|
|
208 | (26) |
|
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
12.2 Fundamentals of Torrens |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
12.3 Key elements of legislative framework supporting Torrens fundamentals |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
12.3.1 Paper certificate of title |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
12.3.2 Qualified witnesses for execution of instruments |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
12.3.3 Certifications by the party executing the document |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
12.3.4 Independent registrar to ensure compliance with Torrens legislation |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
12.3.5 State guarantee of title |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
12.4 Regulatory framework for electronic conveyancing |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
12.5 Changes to conveyancing process impacting key elements of Torrens |
|
|
216 | (6) |
|
12.5.1 Use of an ELN is mandated and only accessible to subscribers |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
12.5.2 Paper certificates of title replaced with verification of identity and right to deal |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
12.5.3 Lawyer or conveyancer to sign registry instruments - no witness |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
12.5.4 New certifications by signers |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
12.6 Automated lodgement and registration |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
12.6.1 Automated lodgement of data - role of the ELN |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
12.6.2 Automated registration - how does it work? |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
12.7 Registrar's role in an automated system |
|
|
224 | (5) |
|
12.7.1 Is automated registration a delegation? |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
12.7.2 What decisions are made by the automated registration system? |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
12.7.3 Accuracy of the register - data matching and computer logic |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
12.7.4 Compliance with statutory requirements - can computer logic effectively review legal compliance? |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
12.8 Is delegation of the decision to register authorised by legislation? |
|
|
229 | (3) |
|
12.8.1 Is automated registration authorised by the ECNL? |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
12.8.2 Does the existing statutory power to delegate extend by implication to an automated system? |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
12.8.3 Are other legislative changes to the registrar's powers required? |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
Chapter 13 The Development And Current Position Of Electronic Conveyancing In Ireland |
|
|
234 | (20) |
|
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
13.2 What do we mean by `eConveyancing?' |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
13.3 Historical context - a complex system |
|
|
235 | (4) |
|
13.3.1 Dual system of land registration |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
13.4 Global, European law and national influences |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
13.5 Role of key stakeholders |
|
|
241 | (10) |
|
13.5.1 The Law Reform Commission |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
13.5.2 The Property Registry Authority |
|
|
243 | (4) |
|
13.5.3 The Law Society of Ireland |
|
|
247 | (4) |
|
13.6 Conclusion: time for a new `vision' of electronic conveyancing in Ireland? |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
Chapter 14 Automation Of The New Zealand Torrens Register: Practitioner Abuse, Risk And Liability |
|
|
254 | (25) |
|
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
14.2 The fundamentals of Landonline |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
14.2.3 Settlement and risk |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
14.3 The key role played by certifications |
|
|
256 | (4) |
|
14.3.1 The role of certifications under the old manual system |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
14.3.2 Disquiet with analyses |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
14.3.3 The role of practitioner certifications under Landonline |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
14.3.4 Relevant provisions in the Land Transfer Act 2017 |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
14.4 Increased liability imposed on practitioners by the 2017 Act |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
14.5 What does the certification cover? |
|
|
261 | (3) |
|
14.5.1 Certification of personal authority issues |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
14.5.2 Certification of legal compliance |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
14.5.3 Audit of practitioners' records |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
14.6 Criticisms of the required practitioner certifications |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
14.6.2 Proof of ownership |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
14.6.3 Proof of authority to deal |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
14.7 Is there any evidence under Landonline of increased misuse or abuse? |
|
|
267 | (4) |
|
14.7.1 Recorded instances of practitioner abuse |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
14.7.2 Corrections of the register arising from error (including those of practitioners) |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
14.7.3 Disciplinary hearings arising from practitioner abuse |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
14.7.4 Practitioner abuse before the Courts - The Queen v Xu and Others |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
14.7.5 Closing comments on abuse findings |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
14.8 Under Landonline is there a transfer of risk to practitioners? |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
14.8.1 More recent developments |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
14.8.2 Where this issue lies |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
14.9 The new'safe harbour'regime |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
14.10 What opportunities are there for improvement of Landonline to reduce risk? |
|
|
273 | (2) |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
PART III CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES AND EMERGING CHALLENGES |
|
|
|
Chapter 15 Are Land Registers Becoming Online Intermediary Platforms Of Land Data? |
|
|
279 | (15) |
|
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
15.2 Public or private: a mixture |
|
|
280 | (2) |
|
15.3 Impact of `disruptive technologies' |
|
|
282 | (5) |
|
15.4 Who `owns' what in a hybrid world? |
|
|
287 | (4) |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
|
292 | (2) |
|
Chapter 16 Privatisation, The Consensus Algorithms Of Blockchains And Land Titling In Australia: Where Are We Now, And Where Are We Going? |
|
|
294 | (21) |
|
|
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
16.2 The commercialisation/privatisation of land registers |
|
|
296 | (9) |
|
|
298 | (2) |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
|
301 | (3) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
16.2.5 Queensland, Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
16.3 Concerns regarding `privatisation' in the Australian context |
|
|
305 | (4) |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
16.3.2 Guarantee of title |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
16.3.3 Adequacy of safeguards and oversight |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
16.3.4 Privacy and data ownership |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
16.4 Blockchains in Australia |
|
|
309 | (3) |
|
16.4.1 What the blockchain can do |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
16.4.2 What the authors think they will do |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
16.5 Some concluding thoughts on commercialisation |
|
|
312 | (1) |
|
16.6 Some concluding thoughts on blockchains |
|
|
313 | (2) |
|
Chapter 17 Judicial Interpretation Of Torrens Registered Documents |
|
|
315 | (19) |
|
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
17.2 Green Growth No 2 Ltd v Queen Elizabeth the Second National Trust |
|
|
316 | (6) |
|
17.3 The drivers for a restrictive approach |
|
|
322 | (2) |
|
17.4 The importance of fundamental Torrens principles in this context |
|
|
324 | (3) |
|
17.5 Towards a principled approach |
|
|
327 | (6) |
|
|
327 | (2) |
|
17.5.2 Leases and mortgages |
|
|
329 | (4) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
Chapter 18 Indigenous Land Rights And Land Registration Systems: Maori And The Land Transfer Act 2017 |
|
|
334 | (19) |
|
|
|
334 | (2) |
|
|
336 | (4) |
|
18.2.1 Early Maori land legislation, 1862-1873 |
|
|
336 | (2) |
|
18.2.2 Consolidation, 1909-1953 |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
18.2.3 From assimilation to integration, 1967-1992 |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
18.3 Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 |
|
|
340 | (3) |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
|
341 | (2) |
|
18.4 The impact of indefeasibility of title on Maori land |
|
|
343 | (3) |
|
18.5 Maori freehold land registration project |
|
|
346 | (1) |
|
|
347 | (2) |
|
18.7 `Manifest injustice'and the Land Transfer Act 2017 |
|
|
349 | (2) |
|
|
351 | (2) |
|
Chapter 19 Managing Property Law Risk: The Role Of Private Insurance |
|
|
353 | (17) |
|
|
19.1 Property law and risk management |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
19.2 International response to private insurance |
|
|
354 | (4) |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
19.2.2 United Kingdom - legal indemnity insurance |
|
|
356 | (2) |
|
19.2.3 Australia and New Zealand |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
19.3 Distinction between land ownership and land use |
|
|
358 | (2) |
|
19.4 Managing property law risk without insurance |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
19.5 Managing property law risk with insurance |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
19.6 Unknown risks - New Zealand |
|
|
362 | (4) |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
19.6.2 Searches and enquiries |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
19.6.3 General ownership cover |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
19.6.4 Electronic conveyancing risk |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
19.6.5 Planning / building regulation issues |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
19.6.6 Boundary structures and encroachments |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
19.6.8 Defective lease or common ownership issues |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
19.6.9 Breach of covenant |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
19.6.10 First party policy |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
19.6.12 Triggering a claim |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
19.7 Known risks - New Zealand |
|
|
366 | (2) |
|
19.7.1 Insuring an identified risk |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
19.7.2 Underwriting identified risk |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
19.7.3 Examples of specific risks policies |
|
|
366 | (2) |
|
19.8 Scope of property law insurance - commercial risks/unregistered interests |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
19.8.2 Commercial risk and warranties |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
19.8.3 Unregistered land/deeds of lease |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
19.9 Developing legal indemnity insurance in New Zealand |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
Chapter 20 Land Registration In England And Wales: Problems, Solutions And Missed Opportunities |
|
|
370 | (17) |
|
|
|
20.1 Where are we? The functions of the Land Registration Act 2002 |
|
|
370 | (2) |
|
20.2 Initial problems and their resolution |
|
|
372 | (2) |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
20.2.2 Priorities and rectification |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
20.2.3 Status of deregistered proprietor |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
20.3 New emerging problems and their solutions |
|
|
374 | (4) |
|
|
374 | (1) |
|
20.3.2 Owner's powers and rectification |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
|
376 | (2) |
|
20.4 Where are we going? Updating the Land Registration Act 2002 |
|
|
378 | (2) |
|
|
380 | (5) |
|
20.5.1 Valuable consideration as a trigger for priority |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
20.5.2 Postponing and protecting interests |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
20.5.3 Correcting mistakes |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
20.5.4 Overriding interests |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
|
385 | (2) |
Index |
|
387 | |