Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Q-adverbs as Selective Binders: The Quantificational Variability of Free Relatives and Definite DPs [De Gruyter e-raamatud]

  • De Gruyter e-raamatud
  • Hind: 167,94 €*
  • * hind, mis tagab piiramatu üheaegsete kasutajate arvuga ligipääsu piiramatuks ajaks

This series consists of collected volumes and monographs about specific issues dealing with interfaces among the subcomponents of linguistic structure: phonology-morphology, phonology-syntax, syntax-semantics, syntax-morphology, and syntax-lexicon. Recent linguistic research has recognized that the subcomponents of grammar interact in non-trivial ways. What is currently under debate is the actual range of such interactions and their most appropriate representation in grammar, and this is precisely the focus of this series. Specifically, it provides a general overview of various topics by examining them through the interaction of grammatical components. The books function as a state-of- the-art report of research.



This book deals with the interpretation of adverbially quantified sentences containing definite DPs and Free Relatives (FR) Thereby, it concentrates on the origins of Quantificational Variability Effects (QVEs), i.e. readings according to which the respective quantificational adverb seems to quantify over the individuals denoted by the respective DP/FR.
QVEs are usually discussed only in connection with singular indefinites and bare plurals. This book therefore provides the first comprehensive account of QVEs with definite DPs and Free Relatives (while also discussing singular indefinites and bare plurals). Presenting new empirical observations and arguments for the assumption that Q-adverbs quantify over situations exclusively, it is also an important contribution to the theoretical debate concerning the quantificational domain of Q-adverbs..
It is of interest to linguists working in formal semantics and the syntax-semantics interface as well as to philosophers of language who are interested in adverbial quantification and situation semantics. Furthermore, it offers an introduction to the core issues of situation semantics and adverbial quantification and is therefore accessible to graduate students interested in these topics.

Acknowledgments v
Introduction 1(8)
Quantificational Variability Effects in Sentences with Free Relatives
9(60)
Syntactic Properties of FRs
10(12)
Semantic Properties of FRs
22(23)
Semantic arguments for analysing FRs as as definite DPs
22(5)
Femantic arguments for analysing FRs as indefinites
27(1)
The problem of quantificational Variability
27(10)
Further argunents for analysing FRs as Indefinites
37(8)
QVEs as the By - Product of Quantification over Minimal Situations
45(20)
Dayal's (1995) basic suggestion
45(1)
The basics of situation semantics
46(7)
FRs, definite DPs and situation semantics
53(1)
A comparison betweeen the behaviour of FRs and singular definites in adveerbially quantified sentences
54(7)
Can the uniqueness/maximality condition associated with the difinite determiner be relativezed with respect to the situations quantified over by Q-adverbs?
61(4)
Chapter Summary
65(4)
The Case of Singular Definites and Universally Quantified DPs
69(114)
Introduction: Singular Definites in Sentences with Q-Adverbs
69(8)
A recapitulation of the basic problem
69
A failed attempt to account for QVEs in adverbially quantified sentences with definites: the approach of Graff (2001)
7o(74)
A brief sketch of how the observed constraints can be accounted for
74(3)
Q-Adverbs and Universally Quantified DPs
77(32)
The phenomenon of implicit restrictions
77(5)
The available readings
82(9)
The role of contextual clues in licensing the co-varying reading
91(7)
Are co-varying readings also possible if the universally quantified DPs are interpreted in the restereted in the restriction of the Q-adverbs?
98(7)
A comparison to Beghelli and Stowell (1997)
105(4)
Section Summary
109(1)
QVEs in Sentences with Singular Definites
109(1)
Contextual Licensing
109(12)
Contrastive topicality as a clue that makes available covarying interpretations of singular definites
121(2)
The behaviour of contrastive topics with respect to the mapping algorithm in general
123(1)
Krifka (1998) on contrastive topics
124(1)
Evidence for a real ambiguity: The existence of two different readings in sentences with proper names as Contrastive topics
125(9)
The final analysis of QVE in sentences with singular definites marked as contrastive topics
134(8)
A New mapping Algorithm
142(41)
The basic problem repeated
142(2)
The role of word order and intonation in adverbially quantified sentences with indefinites
144(3)
The role of word order and intonation in adverbially quantified sentences with singular definetes of universally quantified DPs
147(1)
The situation in English
147(8)
The situation in German
155(9)
The interpretation of adverbially quantified sentences with topical indefinites
164(13)
Chapter Summary
177(6)
QVEs in Sentences with FRs of Plural Definites
183(84)
Word Order and Intonation
184(24)
The basic facts
184(7)
The LF representations of adverbially quantified sentences with FRs
191(1)
Sentences where the FR gets mapped onto the nuclear scope
191(2)
Sentences where the FR gets mapped onto the restriction
193(4)
Two failed attempts
197(1)
Quantification over situation containing a realization of the kind denoted by the FR
198(6)
The second attempt: Quantification over the atomic parts of the plural individual denoted by the FR
204(4)
How Tense Affects Adverbial Quantification
208(53)
Some data
208(4)
Conceivable solution strategies
212(1)
Greenberg's (2002,2003) restrictions regarding generic readings of sentences with singular indefinites
212(3)
Specificity?
215(1)
A pragmatic account
215(1)
Preliminaries
215(1)
The interval resolution strategy
216(2)
Quantification over individuals
218(4)
Quantification over situations
222(6)
Explicit interval setting
228(2)
Interval resetting induced by presuppositions
230(3)
Causally related situations
233(5)
Section summary
238(1)
How QVEs Come About in Sentences with FRs or Plural Definites
239(1)
Quantification over the atomic parts of Complex situations
240(1)
Nakanishi and Romero (2004)on `for the most part'
240(3)
A slightly modified version of Nakanishi and Romero's idea
243(5)
An explanation for the tense agreement effect
248(5)
The coincidence constraint
253(5)
QVEs in sentences with kind-denoting DPs
258(3)
Conclusion
261(6)
References 267(18)
Index 285
Stefan Hinterwimmer, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Germany.