Acknowledgments |
|
v | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (8) |
|
Quantificational Variability Effects in Sentences with Free Relatives |
|
|
9 | (60) |
|
Syntactic Properties of FRs |
|
|
10 | (12) |
|
Semantic Properties of FRs |
|
|
22 | (23) |
|
Semantic arguments for analysing FRs as as definite DPs |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
Femantic arguments for analysing FRs as indefinites |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
The problem of quantificational Variability |
|
|
27 | (10) |
|
Further argunents for analysing FRs as Indefinites |
|
|
37 | (8) |
|
QVEs as the By - Product of Quantification over Minimal Situations |
|
|
45 | (20) |
|
Dayal's (1995) basic suggestion |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
The basics of situation semantics |
|
|
46 | (7) |
|
FRs, definite DPs and situation semantics |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
A comparison betweeen the behaviour of FRs and singular definites in adveerbially quantified sentences |
|
|
54 | (7) |
|
Can the uniqueness/maximality condition associated with the difinite determiner be relativezed with respect to the situations quantified over by Q-adverbs? |
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
|
65 | (4) |
|
The Case of Singular Definites and Universally Quantified DPs |
|
|
69 | (114) |
|
Introduction: Singular Definites in Sentences with Q-Adverbs |
|
|
69 | (8) |
|
A recapitulation of the basic problem |
|
|
69 | |
|
A failed attempt to account for QVEs in adverbially quantified sentences with definites: the approach of Graff (2001) |
|
|
7o | (74) |
|
A brief sketch of how the observed constraints can be accounted for |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
Q-Adverbs and Universally Quantified DPs |
|
|
77 | (32) |
|
The phenomenon of implicit restrictions |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
|
82 | (9) |
|
The role of contextual clues in licensing the co-varying reading |
|
|
91 | (7) |
|
Are co-varying readings also possible if the universally quantified DPs are interpreted in the restereted in the restriction of the Q-adverbs? |
|
|
98 | (7) |
|
A comparison to Beghelli and Stowell (1997) |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
QVEs in Sentences with Singular Definites |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (12) |
|
Contrastive topicality as a clue that makes available covarying interpretations of singular definites |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
The behaviour of contrastive topics with respect to the mapping algorithm in general |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Krifka (1998) on contrastive topics |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Evidence for a real ambiguity: The existence of two different readings in sentences with proper names as Contrastive topics |
|
|
125 | (9) |
|
The final analysis of QVE in sentences with singular definites marked as contrastive topics |
|
|
134 | (8) |
|
|
142 | (41) |
|
The basic problem repeated |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
The role of word order and intonation in adverbially quantified sentences with indefinites |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
The role of word order and intonation in adverbially quantified sentences with singular definetes of universally quantified DPs |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (8) |
|
|
155 | (9) |
|
The interpretation of adverbially quantified sentences with topical indefinites |
|
|
164 | (13) |
|
|
177 | (6) |
|
QVEs in Sentences with FRs of Plural Definites |
|
|
183 | (84) |
|
Word Order and Intonation |
|
|
184 | (24) |
|
|
184 | (7) |
|
The LF representations of adverbially quantified sentences with FRs |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Sentences where the FR gets mapped onto the nuclear scope |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
Sentences where the FR gets mapped onto the restriction |
|
|
193 | (4) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Quantification over situation containing a realization of the kind denoted by the FR |
|
|
198 | (6) |
|
The second attempt: Quantification over the atomic parts of the plural individual denoted by the FR |
|
|
204 | (4) |
|
How Tense Affects Adverbial Quantification |
|
|
208 | (53) |
|
|
208 | (4) |
|
Conceivable solution strategies |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Greenberg's (2002,2003) restrictions regarding generic readings of sentences with singular indefinites |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
The interval resolution strategy |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
Quantification over individuals |
|
|
218 | (4) |
|
Quantification over situations |
|
|
222 | (6) |
|
Explicit interval setting |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
Interval resetting induced by presuppositions |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
Causally related situations |
|
|
233 | (5) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
How QVEs Come About in Sentences with FRs or Plural Definites |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
Quantification over the atomic parts of Complex situations |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
Nakanishi and Romero (2004)on `for the most part' |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
A slightly modified version of Nakanishi and Romero's idea |
|
|
243 | (5) |
|
An explanation for the tense agreement effect |
|
|
248 | (5) |
|
The coincidence constraint |
|
|
253 | (5) |
|
QVEs in sentences with kind-denoting DPs |
|
|
258 | (3) |
|
|
261 | (6) |
References |
|
267 | (18) |
Index |
|
285 | |