Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World [Kõva köide]

(University Research Chair in Administrative Law and Governance, University of Ottawa)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 320 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 240x165x23 mm, kaal: 649 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 05-Aug-2021
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0192896911
  • ISBN-13: 9780192896919
Teised raamatud teemal:
Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law WorldSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: Hardback, 320 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 240x165x23 mm, kaal: 649 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 05-Aug-2021
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0192896911
  • ISBN-13: 9780192896919
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9780192896919.html
Märksõnad:
Around the common law world, the law of judicial review of administrative action has changed dramatically in recent decades, accelerating a centuries-long process of incremental evolution. This book offers a fresh framework for understanding the core features of contemporary administrative
law. Through comparative analysis of case law from Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, and New Zealand, the author develops an interpretive approach by reference to four values: individual self-realisation, good administration, electoral legitimacy, and decisional autonomy. The interaction of this
plurality of values explains the structure of the vast field of judicial review of administrative action: institutional structures, procedural fairness, substantive review, remedies, restrictions on remedies, and the scope of judicial review. Addressing this wide array of subjects in detail, the
book demonstrates how a pluralist approach, with the values being employed in a complementary and balanced fashion, can enhance our understanding of administrative law. Furthermore, such an approach can guide the future development of the law of judicial review of administrative action, a point
illustrated by a careful analysis of the unsettled doctrinal area of legitimate expectation. The book closes by arguing that the author's values-based, pluralist framework supports the legitimacy of contemporary administrative law which, although sometimes called into question, facilitates the
flourishing of individuals, of public administration, and of the liberal democratic system.

Arvustused

In providing the path to resolving difficult issues Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World is a valuable and outstanding work. Dr Daly's book provides a deep, reflective approach to administrative law that establishes foundational values that guide the principles which, themselves, form the basis for the understanding and development of administrative law rules. * Justice James Edelman and Susanna Connolly, Australian Journal of Administrative Law * marvellous * Peter Cane, British Association of Comparative Law Symposium * interesting and involves coverage of an impressive range of case law from different jurisdictions within the common law ... a very good book * John Bell, British Association of Comparative Law Symposium * Professor Paul Daly's new book, Understanding Administrative Law in the Common Law World, represents a major contribution to thinking about administrative law in common law systems. I very much enjoyed reading it and gained a lot from it. It is a book that is likely to be very widely read and is destined to shape understanding of administrative law ... the book is a major achievement. * Jason N E Varuhas, Admin Law Blog * This book is a worthwhile exploration of the values that should permeate judicial review of administrative action ... the book provides a framework for understanding the "barnacles on the hull of a shipwreck" that is administrative law. * Ian Mackenzie, Slaw - Canada's online legal magazine *

1 A Values-based Approach
1(31)
1.1 Background
2(12)
1.1.1 Historical Development and Procedural Reform
2(6)
1.1.2 Contemporary Debates
8(4)
1.1.3 Administrative Law Today
12(2)
1.2 Four Values
14(8)
1.2.1 Individual Self-realisation: Protecting Individual Interests
14(2)
1.2.2 Good Administration: Avoid Compromising Effective and Efficient Public Administration
16(1)
1.2.3 Electoral Legitimacy: Respecting the Roles of Elected Representatives
17(1)
1.2.4 Decisional Autonomy: Maintaining Distinct Roles for Courts and Administrative Decision-makers
18(2)
1.2.5 Structure: Complementarity and Balance
20(2)
1.3 Interpreting Administrative Law
22(4)
1.4 Comparative Administrative Law
26(1)
1.5 Pluralist Administrative Law
27(3)
1.6 Overview
30(2)
2 Institutional Structures
32(33)
2.1 The Structure of the No-Bias Principle
33(5)
2.1.1 Waiver
35(1)
2.1.2 De Minimis Exception
36(1)
2.1.3 Elected Officials
36(2)
2.1.4 Principle of Necessity
38(1)
2.2 Determinations as to whether Conduct Leads to Bias
38(7)
2.2.1 Prior Knowledge
40(3)
2.2.2 Statutory Authorisation
43(2)
2.3 Retention of Discretion
45(19)
2.3.1 The No-Delegation Principle
45(5)
2.3.2 The Carltona Exception
50(6)
2.3.3 Fettering of Discretion
56(8)
2.4 Conclusion
64(1)
3 Procedural Fairness
65(39)
3.1 The General Structure of the Duty of Fairness
67(9)
3.2 Exceptions to the Duty of Fairness
76(5)
3.2.1 Legislative Decisions
76(2)
3.2.2 Emergencies
78(2)
3.2.3 Legislative Ouster
80(1)
3.3 Procedural Fairness Rights
81(21)
3.3.1 Scope of Procedural Fairness
82(3)
3.3.2 Notice and Comment
85(5)
3.3.3 Oral Hearing
90(2)
3.3.4 Cross-examination
92(2)
3.3.5 Rules of Evidence
94(2)
3.3.6 Legal Representation
96(2)
3.3.7 Reasons
98(4)
3.4 Conclusion
102(2)
4 Substantive Review
104(41)
4.1 Jurisdictional Issues
106(18)
4.1.1 Electoral Legitimacy and Decisional Autonomy
109(2)
4.1.2 Good Administration
111(2)
4.1.3 Individual Self-realisation
113(3)
4.1.4 Deference on Questions of Law
116(8)
4.2 Abuse of Discretion
124(17)
4.2.1 Contemporary Characteristics
125(3)
4.2.2 Variation in the Range of Reasonable Outcomes
128(11)
4.2.3 A Note on Reasoned Decision-making
139(2)
4.3 Relevancy and Propriety
141(2)
4.4 Conclusion
143(2)
5 Remedies
145(29)
5.1 The Broad Scope of Declaratory Relief
147(4)
5.2 Certiorari and Decisional Autonomy
151(1)
5.3 Judicial Reluctance to Grant Prohibition
152(2)
5.4 The Limited Scope of Mandamus
154(7)
5.5 Injunctive Relief
161(2)
5.6 Refusal of Relief
163(8)
5.6.1 Starting Point: A Remedy Should be Provided
164(2)
5.6.2 The Discretionary Nature of Judicial Review Remedies
166(1)
5.6.3 Principled Grounds for Withholding a Remedy
167(4)
5.7 Severance
171(1)
5.8 Conclusion
172(2)
6 Restrictions on Remedies
174(26)
6.1 Procedural Requirements
175(3)
6.2 Exhaustion of Alternative Remedies
178(4)
6.3 Collateral Attack
182(2)
6.4 Exclusion of Review
184(7)
6.5 Ripeness and Prematurity
191(2)
6.6 Standing
193(6)
6.7 Conclusion
199(1)
7 Scope of Judicial Review of Administrative Action
200(24)
7.1 Scoping the Scope of Judicial Review
202(3)
7.2 Electoral Legitimacy
205(6)
7.2.1 Democratic Nexus
206(2)
7.2.2 Commercial Activities
208(2)
7.2.3 Statutory Obligations
210(1)
7.3 Good Administration
211(3)
7.3.1 Codes of Practice
211(2)
7.3.2 Deference
213(1)
7.4 Decisional Autonomy
214(5)
7.4.1 An Exclusionary Rule
215(1)
7.4.2 Contractual Powers and Public Purposes
216(1)
7.4.3 Accountability Gaps and Individual Interests
217(2)
7.5 Individual Self-realisation
219(2)
7.6 Conclusion
221(3)
8 Legitimate Expectation
224(23)
8.1 The Plurality of Legitimate Expectation
226(3)
8.2 Administrative Law Values in the Decided Cases
229(5)
8.2.1 Abuse of Power
229(1)
8.2.2 Good Administration
229(1)
8.2.3 Individual Self-realisation
230(2)
8.2.4 Electoral Legitimacy and Decisional Autonomy
232(2)
8.3 A Pluralist Approach to Legitimate Expectation and Administrative Law Values
234(2)
8.4 Protecting Legitimate Expectations: Pluralism in Action
236(9)
8.4.1 Knowledge and Reliance
236(3)
8.4.2 Substantive Legitimate Expectations
239(4)
8.4.3 Ultra Vires Representations
243(2)
8.5 Conclusion
245(2)
9 Defending Administrative Law
247(16)
9.1 Fit
247(5)
9.2 Transparency
252(1)
9.3 Coherence
253(3)
9.4 Morality
256(5)
9.4.1 Legitimacy
257(2)
9.4.2 The Moral Character of Contemporary Administrative Law
259(2)
9.5 Conclusion
261(2)
Index 263
Dr Paul Daly holds the University Research Chair in Administrative Law & Governance at the University of Ottawa. Educated at University College Cork, the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and the University of Cambridge, he has taught administrative law as a faculty member at the University of Cambridge, the Université de Montréal, and the University of Ottawa, and as a visiting professor at the Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas. His award-winning scholarship has been cited dozens of times by courts in Australia, Canada, and Ireland. He is a regular speaker at national and international academic conferences, as well as professional development events, including for members of the judiciary.