Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Unjust Enrichment and Countervailing Obligations

(One Essex Court, UK)
  • Formaat - EPUB+DRM
  • Hind: 99,45 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

This book explores the relationship between the English law of unjust enrichment and legal obligations arising from other branches of the law.

It examines the question, primarily, by considering how English courts resolve conflicts between restitution claims and countervailing legal entitlements. This is much needed given recent cases such as IEG v Zurich Insurance and Avonwick Holdings Ltd v Azitio Holdings Ltd clearly showing the differing positions taken by English courts on the question.

By applying insights from the theory of unjust enrichment to Anglo-Australian case law, this study gives a welcome cogent explanation of a complex question.

Arvustused

This book is a valuable treatment of the particular enrichment-interaction questions which it addresses. It is also, more generally, an example of scholarship on interaction in private law to which others could look for guidance. For rising to the hard task he set himself, and devoting his efforts to thorny questions that really matter, Dr Krishnaprasad is to be congratulated and thanked. * Edinburgh Law Review *

Muu info

Offers a cogent framework to the English courts approach when resolving conflicts between restitution claims and countervailing legal entitlements.

1. The Good Consideration Rule and the Obligation Rule
2. The Enrichment Explanation
3. Objections and Alternative Explanations
4. Bright-Line Rule or Flexible Exception
5. The Subsidiarity of Unjust Enrichment
6. The Obligation Rule in the 'Fairchild Enclave'
7. An Entitlement Explanation
8. A Corrective Justice Explanation
9. Consequences of the Equality Explanation

KV Krishnaprasad is a barrister at One Essex Court, UK.