|
List of Figures, Tables and Boxes |
|
|
ix | |
|
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations |
|
|
xiv | |
About the Contributors |
|
xvii | |
Preface |
|
xx | |
|
Introduction to EIA Follow-up |
|
|
1 | (21) |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Objectives of EIA follow-up |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Contextual setting for EIA follow-up |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Challenges for EIA follow-up |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (5) |
|
Theoretical Perspectives on EIA and Follow-up |
|
|
22 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Origins of the concept of EIA and follow-up |
|
|
22 | (4) |
|
Relationship between planning and EIA |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
The tension between theory and practice |
|
|
28 | (5) |
|
Positioning EIA follow-up in the planning process |
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
A Practical Framework for EIA Follow-up |
|
|
42 | (21) |
|
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
A practical follow-up framework |
|
|
43 | (14) |
|
Relationship between the follow-up framework and the generic EIA process |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
Designing for EIA Follow-up: Experiences from The Netherlands |
|
|
63 | (34) |
|
|
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
EIA and follow-up in The Netherlands |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
Screening: Determining the need for EIA follow-up |
|
|
68 | (5) |
|
Scoping: Defining the content of EIA follow-up |
|
|
73 | (6) |
|
The result of screening and scoping: A follow-up programme |
|
|
79 | (6) |
|
The Derde Merwedehaven waste disposal facility |
|
|
85 | (8) |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
Appraising Effects of Mitigation Measures: The Grand Coulee Dam's Impacts on Fisheries |
|
|
97 | (21) |
|
|
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Introduction to GCD and CBP |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
Environmental Impact Statements for GCD and CBP |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
Mitigation of impacts on Columbia River salmonids |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
Difficulties in isolating effects of GCD and GCFMP |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
Irreversible and irretrievable impacts of GCD on salmon |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
Conclusions and policy implications |
|
|
111 | (7) |
|
Can Industry Benefit from Participation in EIA--follow-up? The ScottishPower Experience |
|
|
118 | (36) |
|
|
|
118 | (3) |
|
UK EIA regulations and follow-up practice |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
Benefits of EIA follow-up for industry: Motivating factors for proponents |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Deriving value from EIA follow-up: ScottishPower's experience and case studies |
|
|
124 | (11) |
|
The management of EIA follow-up: Improving practice |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
A practical framework for environmental management plans |
|
|
138 | (9) |
|
Discussion and conclusions |
|
|
147 | (7) |
|
EIA Follow-up and Adaptive Management |
|
|
154 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
The importance of environmental management |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
EIA follow-up and environmental management in Western Australia |
|
|
157 | (12) |
|
Factors promoting adaptive environmental management in EIA |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
Future directions for EIA follow-up and adaptive environmental management |
|
|
171 | (4) |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
The Independent Environmental Watchdog: A Canadian Experiment in EIA Follow-up |
|
|
178 | (19) |
|
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (9) |
|
Independent Environmental Monitoring Agency |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
Community involvement in follow-up studies |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (5) |
|
Learning by Doing: EIA Follow-up in Hong Kong |
|
|
197 | (27) |
|
|
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Overview of EIA procedures in Hong Kong |
|
|
198 | (10) |
|
Process innovations in EIA follow-up |
|
|
208 | (5) |
|
Content innovations in EIA follow-up |
|
|
213 | (3) |
|
Case study: Penny's Bay redevelopment |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
Follow up to Strategic Environmental Assessment |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
Conclusions and lessons learned |
|
|
220 | (4) |
|
Follow-up in Current SEA Understanding |
|
|
224 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Current understanding of SEA |
|
|
224 | (6) |
|
Rationale and goals of follow-up in SEA |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
Tiers in strategic decision-making and consequences for follow-up |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
Existing requirements for follow-up |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
Follow-up case examples in existing policy-, plan- and programme-making |
|
|
239 | (4) |
|
Methodological guidance for follow-up |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (4) |
|
On Evaluating the Success of EIA and SEA |
|
|
248 | (38) |
|
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
Organizing concepts and delineation of approach |
|
|
249 | (4) |
|
Meta-evaluation of the success of EIA and SEA as policy concepts and tools |
|
|
253 | (9) |
|
Macro-evaluation of the success of EIA and SEA systems and components |
|
|
262 | (14) |
|
Micro-evaluation of the success of EIA and SEA application |
|
|
276 | (3) |
|
|
279 | (7) |
|
Lessons for EIA Follow-up |
|
|
286 | (29) |
|
|
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Best practice EIA follow-up |
|
|
287 | (11) |
|
Principles for effective EIA follow-up |
|
|
298 | (5) |
|
Future directions for EIA follow-up |
|
|
303 | (9) |
|
|
312 | (3) |
Appendix 1: Framework for EIA Follow-up and Effectiveness and Performance Review (Adapted from Sadler, 1996) |
|
315 | (9) |
Index |
|
324 | |