| Preface |
|
xi | |
| Table of cases |
|
xv | |
| Table of legislation |
|
xxiii | |
| Table of statutory instruments |
|
xxv | |
| Table of international legislation |
|
xxvii | |
| PART A Introduction |
|
1 | |
|
1. Background to directors' responsibilities |
|
|
3 | |
|
|
|
3 | |
|
Directors – who are they? |
|
|
4 | |
|
Responsibilities and obligations |
|
|
8 | |
|
|
|
12 | |
|
2. Creditors – who are they? |
|
|
13 | |
|
|
|
13 | |
|
|
|
15 | |
|
|
|
15 | |
|
|
|
18 | |
|
|
|
18 | |
|
|
|
18 | |
|
|
|
21 | |
| PART B Fraudulent trading |
|
23 | |
|
3. Fraudulent trading: background, aims and comparisons |
|
|
25 | |
|
|
|
25 | |
|
|
|
25 | |
|
|
|
27 | |
|
|
|
28 | |
|
4. The fraudulent trading provision and its scope |
|
|
31 | |
|
|
|
31 | |
|
The make-up of section 213 |
|
|
32 | |
|
|
|
33 | |
|
|
|
34 | |
|
|
|
37 | |
|
|
|
39 | |
|
|
|
40 | |
|
What constitutes fraudulent trading? |
|
|
45 | |
|
|
|
45 | |
|
|
|
46 | |
|
The destination of proceeds |
|
|
48 | |
|
5. Intent to defraud and fraudulent purpose |
|
|
51 | |
|
|
|
51 | |
|
|
|
52 | |
|
|
|
62 | |
|
|
|
63 | |
|
6. Fraudulent trading: an assessment |
|
|
65 | |
|
|
|
65 | |
|
Actions available before liquidation? |
|
|
65 | |
|
|
|
66 | |
|
|
|
67 | |
|
Interpretation of the provision |
|
|
69 | |
|
Substituting the incurring of debts for fraudulent trading? |
|
|
69 | |
|
|
|
70 | |
| PART C Wrongful trading |
|
71 | |
|
7. Wrongful trading: background, aims, rationale and comparisons |
|
|
73 | |
|
|
|
73 | |
|
|
|
74 | |
|
|
|
75 | |
|
|
|
77 | |
|
|
|
78 | |
|
8. The wrongful trading provision and its scope |
|
|
81 | |
|
|
|
81 | |
|
|
|
81 | |
|
|
|
83 | |
|
The elements required for liability |
|
|
86 | |
|
|
|
93 | |
|
What should directors be doing? |
|
|
94 | |
|
|
|
96 | |
|
The types of companies involved in actions |
|
|
99 | |
|
|
|
100 | |
|
|
|
101 | |
|
|
|
104 | |
|
|
|
109 | |
|
9. A defence to wrongful trading |
|
|
111 | |
|
|
|
111 | |
|
The substance of the defence |
|
|
111 | |
|
|
|
112 | |
|
|
|
121 | |
|
10. An assessment of wrongful trading: pros, problems and prognoses |
|
|
125 | |
|
|
|
125 | |
|
|
|
125 | |
|
|
|
128 | |
|
|
|
129 | |
|
|
|
130 | |
|
|
|
131 | |
|
|
|
136 | |
|
|
|
137 | |
|
|
|
147 | |
|
|
|
149 | |
| PART D A duty to consider the interests of creditors |
|
151 | |
|
11. The development of the duty to consider the interests of creditors |
|
|
153 | |
|
|
|
153 | |
|
The evolution of the duty |
|
|
155 | |
|
Recent judicial opinion in the UK |
|
|
161 | |
|
Approaches in other jurisdictions |
|
|
162 | |
|
The duty considered in the course of law reform in the UK |
|
|
173 | |
|
|
|
176 | |
|
12. The duty to creditors: nature, rationale and need |
|
|
179 | |
|
|
|
179 | |
|
|
|
179 | |
|
The rationale for the duty |
|
|
181 | |
|
|
|
184 | |
|
Disadvantages of bringing proceedings for breach of duty to creditors |
|
|
194 | |
|
Uses for breach of duty actions |
|
|
196 | |
|
|
|
197 | |
|
13. When does the duty arise? |
|
|
199 | |
|
|
|
199 | |
|
The point when the duty arises |
|
|
199 | |
|
|
|
208 | |
|
|
|
220 | |
|
14. How are the directors to function when subject to a duty to creditors? |
|
|
221 | |
|
|
|
221 | |
|
In what ways are directors to function? |
|
|
222 | |
|
The balancing of interests |
|
|
225 | |
|
Governance in Chapter 11 bankruptcy |
|
|
238 | |
|
|
|
241 | |
|
Dissension at board level |
|
|
250 | |
|
|
|
251 | |
|
15. A direct duty to creditors? |
|
|
253 | |
|
|
|
253 | |
|
The problems with a direct duty |
|
|
254 | |
|
|
|
258 | |
|
Should there be an independent duty? |
|
|
264 | |
|
|
|
266 | |
|
16. Commencement of proceedings |
|
|
269 | |
|
|
|
269 | |
|
Shareholders and creditors |
|
|
270 | |
|
|
|
271 | |
|
|
|
272 | |
|
|
|
273 | |
|
Oppression and/or unfair prejudice remedy |
|
|
276 | |
|
Why might some creditors not want to pursue proceedings? |
|
|
279 | |
|
|
|
279 | |
|
17. Are all creditors to be favoured? |
|
|
281 | |
|
|
|
281 | |
|
|
|
281 | |
|
|
|
284 | |
|
|
|
286 | |
| PART E Theoretical analysis |
|
287 | |
|
18. Introduction to the theoretical analysis |
|
|
289 | |
|
19. A theoretical analysis of the duty to consider creditors |
|
|
293 | |
|
|
|
293 | |
|
The contractarian paradigm and the law and economics movement |
|
|
293 | |
|
|
|
300 | |
|
|
|
302 | |
|
|
|
309 | |
|
Creditor protection — is it warranted? |
|
|
319 | |
|
|
|
332 | |
|
Creditors have no right to initiate proceedings |
|
|
336 | |
|
|
|
337 | |
|
The creditors as residual claimants |
|
|
338 | |
|
|
|
340 | |
|
20. A theoretical analysis of wrongful trading |
|
|
343 | |
|
|
|
343 | |
|
|
|
343 | |
|
|
|
359 | |
|
|
|
367 | |
|
21. Directors' responsibilities and opting out |
|
|
369 | |
|
|
|
369 | |
|
Mandatory and enabling (default) rules |
|
|
370 | |
|
|
|
374 | |
|
|
|
375 | |
|
Duty to consider the interests of creditors |
|
|
379 | |
|
|
|
380 | |
|
22. Conclusions and reflections |
|
|
383 | |
| Index |
|
387 | |