|
|
|
ix | |
|
1 Introduction - Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions |
|
|
1 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
Part I Research Methodology, Research Findings, Issues to be Addressed |
|
|
|
|
|
25 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
3 Cross-Border EU Competition Litigation: New Evidence from England and Wales |
|
|
33 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
4 Cross-Border EU Competition Litigation: Qualitative Interviews from Germany |
|
|
61 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
5 Concluding Remarks on Promoting Regulatory Competition: Issues to be Addressed |
|
|
81 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
Part II Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions and the European Courts: Is there a Need for Reform at EU Level? |
|
|
|
6 Introduction: Centralisation (Harmonisation) or Decentralisation (Inter-Jurisdictional Regulatory Competition)? |
|
|
97 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
7 The General Court and its Role in EU Competition Law Cases |
|
|
103 | (6) |
|
|
|
8 Private Antitrust Claims as a `Special Case': Can the General Court be Envisaged as the Appellate Court vis-a-vis Decisions of National Courts? |
|
|
109 | (26) |
|
|
|
9 Conclusion: Cross-Border Aspects of EU Competition Law and Litigants' Strategies |
|
|
135 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Part III EU Competition Law Actions: Jurisdiction and Some Practical/Procedural Issues Arising in a Cross-Border Context |
|
|
|
10 Introduction: The Enforcement Pattern Shaping Litigants' Strategies |
|
|
143 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
11 Tactical Manoeuvres in UK Cartel Damages Litigation |
|
|
149 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
12 Specific Issues in Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions Brought by Multiple Claimants in a German Context |
|
|
159 | (8) |
|
|
|
13 Jurisdiction in Cross-Border EU Competition Law Cases: Some Specific Issues Requiring Specific Solutions |
|
|
167 | (30) |
|
|
|
14 Mastering Masterfoods: Food For Thought On Staying Civil Damages Litigation Pending Appeals Before The European Courts |
|
|
197 | (10) |
|
|
|
15 Some Procedural Aspects and How They Could/Should be Reformed |
|
|
207 | (8) |
|
|
|
16 Observations on the Implications of Pfleiderer for Leniency Programmes |
|
|
215 | (8) |
|
|
|
17 Collective Redress Proceedings: Specific Issues Regarding Jurisdiction and Choice of Law |
|
|
223 | (30) |
|
|
|
18 Collective Redress Antitrust Proceedings: How to Close the Enforcement Gap and Provide Redress for Consumers |
|
|
253 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 Conclusion: Proposing Specific Solutions to Promote Regulatory Competition and Address the Enforcement Gap |
|
|
283 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Part IV Applicable Law: Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions |
|
|
|
20 Introduction: The Importance of Damages in a Cross-Border Context |
|
|
291 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
21 The Applicable Law in Cross-Border Competition Law Actions and Article 6(3) of Regulation 864/2007 |
|
|
297 | (32) |
|
|
|
22 Applicable Law in Cross-Border EU Competition Law Actions - Forum Shopping, Mandatory Rules and Public Policy |
|
|
329 | (8) |
|
|
|
23 An Economic Approach to Remedies in Private Competition Claims |
|
|
337 | (20) |
|
|
|
24 Conclusion: EU Competition Law Damages in a Cross-Border Context |
|
|
357 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Part V Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments |
|
|
|
25 Introduction: Preclusive Effects of Foreign Judgments/Settlements across Europe |
|
|
365 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
26 Abolition of Exequatur under the Brussels I Regulation as it Affects EU Competition Law |
|
|
371 | (14) |
|
|
|
27 The Recognition and Enforcement in the EU of Foreign Judgments in Antitrust Matters: The Case of US and Dutch Judgments and Settlements Rendered upon Class Actions |
|
|
385 | (14) |
|
|
|
28 Conclusion: Some Specific Problems: A Case for Reform |
|
|
399 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
29 The Way Forward: A Strong Case for Reform at EU Level |
|
|
407 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
| Index |
|
421 | |