Update cookies preferences

Comparative Criminal Procedure: A Casebook Approach 2nd Revised ed. [Hardback]

3.00/5 (2 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Format: Hardback, 280 pages, height x width x depth: 224x150x18 mm, weight: 454 g
  • Pub. Date: 29-Jan-2008
  • Publisher: Carolina Academic Press
  • ISBN-10: 1594605009
  • ISBN-13: 9781594605000
Other books in subject:
  • Hardback
  • Price: 44,88 €*
  • * This title is out of print. Used copies may be available, but delivery only inside Baltic States
  • This title is out of print. Used copies may be available, but delivery only inside Baltic States.
  • Quantity:
  • Add to basket
  • Add to Wishlist
Comparative Criminal Procedure: A Casebook Approach 2nd Revised ed.Larger Image
  • Format: Hardback, 280 pages, height x width x depth: 224x150x18 mm, weight: 454 g
  • Pub. Date: 29-Jan-2008
  • Publisher: Carolina Academic Press
  • ISBN-10: 1594605009
  • ISBN-13: 9781594605000
Other books in subject:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9781594605000.html
Keywords:
"As in the first edition, Thaman presents a topical approach to the subject, focusing on the roles of public prosecutors, police, victims, and defense attorneys in the investigation of criminal cases and trials up through the judgment phase. Thaman uses high court jurisprudence in English translation to elucidate the European approach to important, and often controversial, areas of criminal procedure, and he also links criminal procedure with its roots in substantive criminal law. Thaman looks at the early reactions to crimes committed flagrantly or in secret as the historical roots of modern criminal procedure. The approaches of the old inquisitorial system and the use of torture to solve circumstantial evidence crimes are also presented.The Second Edition retains the basic content and organization of the original edition. It updates the citations to U.S. Supreme Court cases and to important literature which has appeared in the last six years and refers to some new important cases, primarily in footnotes. Stylistic improvements in the text and the translations have been made and glossary entries (including some Russian terms) have been added."
Criminal Law and Its Procedures
3(20)
Introduction
3(20)
The Flagrant Crime
4(1)
Assises de la cour des Bourgeois (Ch. CCLIX)
4(1)
§ 16 Constitutio Criminalis Carolina (German Empire, 1532)
5(1)
Questions
6(1)
The Circumstantial Evidence or ``Who-Done-It?'' Case
7(1)
Regulations Regarding Exculpation of William I (England, Late 11th Century)
7(2)
Law II of Edmund (England, 10th Century)
9(1)
§§ 23, 25-27 Constitutio Criminalis Carolina (German Empire, 1532)
10(1)
Questions
11(1)
The Secret Victimless Crime
12(1)
Livre de Jostice et des Plets 1, 3, § 7 (France, 12th Century)
12(2)
Entick v. Carrington (English Court of Common Pleas, 1765)
14(1)
Questions
15(1)
A Brief History of European Criminal Procedure
16(4)
Outline of the Book
20(1)
Selected Readings (History & Theory)
21(1)
Selected Readings (Comparative, Country-Related)
21(2)
The Criminal Investigation: Procedures and Participants
23(22)
The Continuing Role of the Victim in Prosecuting Criminal Cases
23(7)
The Institution of Private Prosecution
23(1)
Decision of December 8, 1906 (Placet) (French Supreme Court)
23(2)
§ 100 LECr (Spain)
25(1)
§ 105 LECr (Spain)
25(2)
Questions
27(1)
Selected Readings
27(1)
The Institution of Popular Prosecution
28(1)
Art. 125 Const. (Spain)
28(1)
§ 101 LECr (Spain)
28(1)
§ 270(1) LECr (Spain)
28(1)
Decision No. 241 of December 21, 1992 (Spanish Constitutional Court)
28(2)
Questions
30(1)
The Role of the Police Before Initiation of Formal Criminal Proceedings: The Police Inquest
30(2)
§ 282 (para. 1) LECr (Spain)
30(1)
§ 286 LECr (Spain)
31(1)
The Formal Criminal Investigation
32(11)
The Search for Truth and the Compilation of the Investigative Dossier
32(1)
§ 80 CPP (France)
32(1)
§§ 81 (paras. 1-2,4) CPP (France)
32(4)
Questions
36(1)
Selected Readings
36(1)
Confrontation and Adversarial Rights during the Preliminary Investigation
36(1)
The Right to Be Present with Counsel
36(1)
§ 118 LECr (Spain)
36(1)
The Right to Make Evidentiary Motions
37(1)
§ 82-1 (paras. 1-2) CPP (France)
37(1)
Proceedings to Preserve or ``Anticipate'' Evidence
38(1)
§ 392(1) CPP (Italy)
38(1)
§ 394 CPP (Italy)
39(1)
§ 401 (1-3,5) CPP (Italy)
39(1)
§ 403(1) CPP (Italy)
39(1)
Identification Procedures
40(1)
The Adversarialization of the Preliminary Investigation
40(1)
§ 25 LOTJ (Spain)
41(1)
§ 27(1) LOTJ (Spain)
41(1)
Questions
42(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
42(1)
Avoiding the Preliminary Investigation
43(2)
§ 449 (1-5) CPP (Italy)
43(1)
Questions
44(1)
Search and Seizure: Search for Truth and Protection of Privacy
45(40)
Police Powers of Investigation, Search and Seizure during the Police Inquest
45(11)
Temporary Investigative Detentions
45(1)
Decision of July 12, 1995 (Spanish Supreme Court)
45(1)
§§ 1.4, 2.2, 2.3 PACE, Code of Practice A (England)
46(1)
Questions
47(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
47(1)
Police Power to Arrest in Flagrant Cases
48(1)
§ 380(1) CPP (Italy)
48(1)
§ 381 (1,4) CPP (Italy)
48(1)
Questions
49(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
49(1)
Definition of a Flagrant Crime
49(1)
Decision of March 29, 1990 (Spanish Supreme Court)
49(2)
Police Powers to Search in Situations of Flagrancy and Incident to Arrest
51(1)
§ 352(1) CPP (Italy)
51(1)
Decision No. 303 of October 25, 1993 (Spanish Constitutional Court)
52(1)
Questions
53(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
53(1)
Consent Searches
54(1)
§ 5 PACE Code of Practice B (England)
54(1)
Decision of July 8, 1994 (Spanish Supreme Court)
55(1)
Questions
55(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
56(1)
The Requirement of Judicial Authorization for Invasions of Privacy
56(29)
The Special Protection of Dwellings
56(1)
The Requirement of a Warrant
56(1)
Art. 13(1,2) Const. (Germany)
56(1)
§ 98 StPO (Germany)
56(1)
The Requirement of Probable Cause
57(1)
Decision of June 28, 1994 (Spanish Supreme Court)
57(2)
Questions
59(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
59(1)
Procedural Safeguards Required during the Search
59(1)
Decision of October 30, 1992 (Spanish Supreme Court)
59(1)
Decision of November 14, 1992 (Spanish Supreme Court)
60(1)
Questions
61(1)
Selected Readings
61(1)
The Protection of Confidential Communications
61(1)
Intercepting Private Conversations
61(1)
Decision No. 49 of March 26, 1996 (Spanish Constitutional Court)
61(3)
§ 266 CPP (Italy)
64(1)
§ 267(1-3) CPP (Italy)
64(1)
§ 268 (4,6) CPP (Italy)
65(1)
Decision of June 25, 1993 (Spanish Supreme Court)
66(2)
Questions
68(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
69(1)
Selected Readings
69(1)
Right to Privacy in the Identity of One's Conversation Partners
69(1)
Decision No. 81 of March 11, 1993 (Italian Constitutional Court)
69(2)
Questions
71(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
71(1)
Informant-Citizen Taping and Interception of Communications
72(1)
Decision of June 14, 1960 (German Supreme Court)
72(1)
Decision of July 5, 1988 (Italian Supreme Court)
73(3)
Decision of October 8, 1993 (German Supreme Court)
76(1)
Questions
77(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
78(1)
The Limits on Police Undercover Activity in the Proactive Investigation of Crime
78(1)
Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal (European Court of Human Rights) (June 9, 1998)
78(2)
Questions
80(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
80(1)
Selected Readings
80(1)
Seizure and Reading of Private Writings
81(1)
Entick v. Carrington (English Court of Common Pleas 1765)
81(1)
Decision of February 21, 1964 (German Supreme Court)
82(1)
Questions
83(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
83(2)
The Defendant as a Source of Evidence: The Privilege against Self-Incrimination
85(20)
Police Interrogations Before the Initiation of Criminal Proceedings
85(11)
Privilege against Self-Incrimination and Right to Counsel during Police Interrogation
85(1)
The Requirement of Admonitions (``Miranda Rights'')
85(1)
Decision of October 29, 1992 (German Supreme Court)
85(2)
Decision of May 21, 1996 (German Supreme Court)
87(1)
§ 64(3)(a,b)(3-bis) CPP (Italy)
88(1)
§ 350 CPP (Italy)
88(2)
§§ 10.1, 10.5 Code of Practice C. PACE (England)
90(1)
Questions
90(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
91(1)
When Must Police Give a Suspect the Miranda-Type Admonitions?
91(1)
Decision of February 27, 1992 (German Supreme Court)
91(1)
Decision of May 31, 1990 (German Supreme Court)
92(1)
§ 63 CPP (Italy)
93(1)
Questions
94(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
94(1)
The Problem of Undercover Interrogation
94(1)
Regina v. Bryce (English Court of Appeals) (1992)
94(2)
The Prevention of Involuntary Confessions
96(7)
§ 136a StPO (Germany)
96(1)
Decision of February 16, 1954 (German Supreme Court)
97(1)
Decision of April 28, 1987 (German Supreme Court)
98(1)
Decision of November 25, 1997 (Court of Appeal of Frankfurt/Main, Germany)
99(2)
Regina v. Fulling (English Court of Appeal) (1987)
101(1)
Questions
102(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
102(1)
The Formal Interrogation of the Accused during the Preliminary Investigation
103(2)
§ 65 CPP (Italy)
103(1)
Questions
104(1)
Selected Readings
104(1)
Determining the Admissibility of Evidence at Trial
105(42)
Exclusion of Illegally Gathered Evidence
105(20)
From Nullities to Non-Usability
105(1)
§ 170 CPP (France)
105(1)
§ 171 CPP (France)
105(1)
§ 174 (para. 3) CPP (France)
106(1)
Decision of July 9, 1993 (Spanish Supreme Court)
106(3)
§ 191 CPP (Italy)
109(1)
The Proportionality Test of Exclusion
110(1)
Decision of February 27, 1992 (German Supreme Court)
110(2)
Decision of February 21, 1964 (German Supreme Court)
112(2)
Case-by-Case Fairness Test: The English Approach
114(1)
Regina v. Samuel (English Court of Appeal) (1987)
114(1)
Presumption of Innocence and Equality of Arms: The Spanish Approach
115(1)
Decision No. 49 of March 26, 1996 (Spanish Constitutional Court)
115(2)
Art. 24(2) Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
117(1)
Questions
118(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
118(1)
Fruits of the Poisonous Tree
118(1)
Decision of June 5, 1995 (Spanish Supreme Court)
118(1)
Decision of February 22, 1978 (German Supreme Court)
119(2)
Regina v. McGovern (English Court of Appeal) (1990)
121(1)
Decision of March 27, 1996 (Italian Supreme Court)
122(2)
Questions
124(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
124(1)
Admissibility of Evidence and the Right to Confrontation
125(22)
The Transformation of the Inquisitorial ``Written'' Trial
125(1)
Decision of July 18, 1884 (French Supreme Court)
125(1)
Kostovski v. The Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) (November 20, 1989)
126(3)
Delta v. France (European Court of Human Rights) (December 19, 1990)
129(2)
Admissibility of Statements of Unavailable Witnesses
131(1)
Decision of March 5, 1993 (Spanish Supreme Court)
131(1)
Regina v. Cole (English Court of Appeal) (1989)
132(3)
Questions
135(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
135(1)
Admissibility of Prior Statements to Impeach or Contradict a Testifying Witness
135(1)
Decision No. 52 of February 23, 1995 (Spanish Constitutional Court)
135(1)
Decision of November 3, 1982 (German Supreme Court)
136(1)
Questions
137(1)
Anonymous Witness Testimony
137(1)
Kostovski v. The Netherlands (European Court of Human Rights) (November 20, 1989)
137(3)
Doorson v. The Netherlands European Court of Human Rights (March 26, 1996)
140(2)
Questions
142(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
142(1)
The Admissibility of Hearsay as Corroborative Evidence
143(1)
Decision of March 31, 1989 (German Supreme Court)
143(4)
Procedural Economy: Avoiding the Trial with All Its Guarantees
147(24)
Different Procedures for Different Substantive Crimes: Avoiding Trials with Lay Participation
147(4)
Regina v. Canterbury et al. (English Divisional Court) (1982)
148(2)
Questions
150(1)
Procedural Encouragement of Confessions to Avoid or Simplify the Trial
151(7)
Decision of August 28, 1997 (German Supreme Court)
151(5)
Decision of June 10, 1998 (German Supreme Court)
156(2)
Accepting the Prosecution's Pleadings: A Way around the Guilty Plea for Lesser Crimes
158(7)
Decision No. 313 of July 3, 1990 (Italian Constitutional Court)
159(3)
Decision of February 19, 1990 (Italian Supreme Court)
162(2)
§ 655 LECr (Spain)
164(1)
Submitting the Case on the Investigative Dossier: Return of the Written Inquisitorial Trial?
165(3)
Decision of November 21, 1991 (Italian Supreme Court)
166(2)
Significance of Alternative Procedures
168(3)
Questions
168(1)
Suggested Readings
169(2)
The Trial
171(52)
Presumption of Innocence and Burden of Proof
171(20)
Presumption of Innocence and Right to Remain Silent
171(1)
The Use of a Defendant's Silence as Evidence of Guilt
171(1)
Murray v. United Kingdom (European Court of Human Rights) (February 8, 1996)
171(6)
Decision of October 26, 1965 (German Supreme Court)
177(1)
Questions
178(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
179(1)
Role of the Trial Judge: Investigator of the Truth, Impartial Evaluator of the Evidence, or Impartial Guarantor of a Fair Adversarial Trial?
179(1)
The Judge's Power to Question Witnesses and Introduce Evidence
179(1)
Decision of October 10, 1991 (Italian Supreme Court)
179(1)
Decision of March 26, 1993 (Italian Supreme Court)
180(2)
Regina v. Foxford (Northern Ireland Court of Appeals) (1974)
182(1)
Regina v. Roncoli (English Court of Appeal) (1997)
183(1)
§ 683 LECr (Spain)
184(1)
§ 310 CPP (France)
184(1)
The Judge as Investigator and Evaluator of the Evidence
185(1)
Decision No. 145 of July 12, 1988 (Spanish Constitutional Court)
185(1)
Decision No. 455 of December 30, 1994 (Italian Constitutional Court)
186(1)
Decision of April 20, 1999 (Russian Constitutional Court)
187(3)
Questions
190(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
191(1)
The Evaluation of the Evidence and Rendering of Judgment
191(32)
Who Evaluates the Evidence?
191(1)
Regina v. Consett Justices, Ex Parte Postal Bingo Ltd. (Queen's Bench, England) (1966)
191(2)
Evaluating the Evidence in a Flagrant Case: Circumstantial Evidence of Mental State
193(1)
Decision of February 9, 1957 (German Supreme Court)
193(2)
Case of Otegi (Guipuzcoa Regional Court, Spain) (Verdict of March 6, 1997)
195(4)
Otegi Case: Decision of March 11, 1998 (Spanish Supreme Court)
199(2)
§ 339 (1-5) UPK (Russia)
201(2)
Case of Kraskina (Ivanovo Regional Court, Russia) (Verdict of March 10, 1995)
203(1)
Decision of June 7, 1995 (Kraskina Case) (Russian Supreme Court)
204(1)
§ 353 CPP (France)
205(1)
§ 63(1)(d) LOTJ (Spain)
206(1)
Evaluating the Non-Flagrant Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence
206(1)
Regina v. Turnbull (English Court of Appeal) (1976)
206(3)
Case of Monika Weimar. Decision of November 6, 1998 (German Supreme Court)
209(5)
Decision of November 17, 1983 (German Supreme Court)
214(2)
Was There a Crime Committed? The Evaluation of the Credibility of Witnesses
216(1)
Decision of January 1, 1988 (German Supreme Court)
217(2)
Decision of December 17, 1997 (German Supreme Court)
219(1)
Concluding Remarks
220(1)
Questions
220(1)
Relevant U.S. Case Law
221(1)
Selected Readings
222(1)
Case Register 223(6)
Statutes and Other Texts 229(4)
Appendix 233(32)
Glossary 265(10)
Index 275