Preface |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xix | |
Authors |
|
xxi | |
|
Section I Situation Awareness Models and Measures |
|
|
|
1 Situation Awareness in Individuals, Teams and Systems: An Overview of Situation Awareness Models and Their Utility for Road Safety Research and Practice |
|
|
3 | (18) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Definitions and Models of SA |
|
|
4 | (9) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (5) |
|
Summary of SA Perspectives |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
Application of SA Models to Intersections |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
Which Approach Is the Most Useful to Support Intersection Analysis and Design? |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
2 What Is Going on? Situation Awareness on the Road |
|
|
21 | (16) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
SA as a Contributory Factor in Road Crashes? |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Driving SA Definitions and Models |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
Road Transport Research Applications |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
In-Vehicle Technologies and SA |
|
|
27 | (3) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Levels of Driving Experience and Ability |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Impact of the Road Environment on Road User SA |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
SA in Different Types of Road User |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Summary of Key Findings from Road Transport--Related SA Research |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
3 It's Good to Talk: Assessing Distributed Situation Awareness on the Road |
|
|
37 | (32) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (7) |
|
Freezes and Networks: An Overview of the SA Measures Used in Road Transport Research |
|
|
44 | (5) |
|
A Systems-Based Network Analysis Approach to SA Assessment in Road Transport |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (7) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Network Content: Common and Unique Concepts |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (10) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Unique and Common Concepts |
|
|
56 | (7) |
|
Key SA Concepts---Sociometric Status |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Section II Distributed Situation Awareness at Intersections |
|
|
|
4 Is Three a Crowd? How Compatible Is the Situation Awareness of Drivers, Motorcyclists and Cyclists? |
|
|
69 | (20) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (5) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
|
75 | (8) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Key SA Concepts at Intersections |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Key SA Concepts along Arterial Roads |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Key SA Concepts at Roundabouts |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Key Concepts along the Shopping Strip |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
Differences in SA across Drivers, Motorcyclists and Cyclists |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Supporting Safe Interactions between Road Users |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
5 Digging Deeper into Incompatibilities between Road User Situation Awareness: Using the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork to Analyse Distributed Situation Awareness at Intersections |
|
|
89 | (20) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
The Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
EAST Analysis of Intersections |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (12) |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Incompatibilities between Road Users at Intersections |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
Design-Induced Incompatibility? |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Making Intersections Safer for All Road Users |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
6 The Flood Study: Examining Naturalistic Interactions between Road Users at Intersections |
|
|
109 | (22) |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Studying SA Naturalistically on Road |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (11) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
|
117 | (5) |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
|
126 | (5) |
|
Section III Designing for Distributed Situation Awareness: A Sociotechnical Systems Approach |
|
|
|
7 Designer Road Environments: A Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Designing for DSA |
|
|
131 | (12) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Sociotechnical Systems Theory |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
Sociotechnical System Design Values |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
The Principles of Sociotechnical System Design |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
A Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Intersection Design |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
A Toolkit for Designing Sociotechnical Intersections |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
141 | (2) |
|
8 Designing for DSA: Using Cognitive Work Analysis to Identify Intersection Design Requirements |
|
|
143 | (22) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (5) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Social Organisation and Co-Operation Analysis |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Worker Competencies Analysis |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
On-Road Studies of Driver Behaviour |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Cognitive Task Analysis Interviews with Drivers |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (13) |
|
|
149 | (4) |
|
|
153 | (7) |
|
Social Organisation and Co-Operation Analysis |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (3) |
|
Section IV Designer Intersections: The Design and Evaluation of New Intersections |
|
|
|
9 Designing New Intersections Using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit |
|
|
165 | (20) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
The Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Applying the CWA-DT to Intersection Design |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
Pre-Workshop Design Planning |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
The Intersection Design Concepts |
|
|
172 | (10) |
|
Self-Regulating Intersection |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
Evaluation of the Design Process |
|
|
178 | (4) |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
10 Multi-Road User Evaluation of Intersection Design Concepts |
|
|
185 | (16) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
185 | (6) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (8) |
|
Participant Perceptions Regarding Current Intersection Design |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Participant Perceptions of the New Intersection Design Concepts |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
Self-Regulating Intersection |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Alignment with Sociotechnical Systems Theory |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
Alignment with Design Goals |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Usability of the Novel Designs by Different Road User Groups |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
Summary of Evaluation Findings for Each Intersection Design Concept |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Self-Regulating Intersection |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
11 Designing for DSA in Future Road Transport Systems and Beyond |
|
|
201 | (28) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Summary of Research Contributions |
|
|
201 | (3) |
|
A Framework for the Design of Safer Road Environments |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
Example Future Applications |
|
|
206 | (9) |
|
Designing for DSA in Future Road Transport Systems |
|
|
206 | (2) |
|
Taking DSA Further---The Entire Road Transport System and Beyond |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
DSA Beyond Transportation |
|
|
210 | (2) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
215 | (14) |
|
Appendices Practical Guidance on Conducting On-Road Studies and Applying EAST and CWA |
|
|
|
Appendix 1 Practical Guidance for Conducting On-Road Studies of Road User SA |
|
|
229 | (10) |
|
Appendix 2 Practical Guidance for the Event Analysis of Systemic Teamwork |
|
|
239 | (8) |
|
Appendix 3 Practical Guidance for Cognitive Work Analysis |
|
|
247 | (12) |
Index |
|
259 | |