| Preface |
|
i | |
| Acknowledgements |
|
v | |
|
Chapter 1 Introduction -- A Critical Analysis of the "Concept" of Prepredicative Experience Within Husserl's Theory of Judgment |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
Section 1A Purpose of the Study |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Section 1B Two Objections |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
Section 1C Two Refutations |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
Section 1D Clarification of a "half-truth" |
|
|
6 | (5) |
|
Chapter 2 An Analysis of Judgments of Perception in Contemplative Perception |
|
|
11 | (14) |
|
Section 2A Emergence of Perceptual and Objective Senses from Judgments of Perception |
|
|
11 | (5) |
|
Section 2B Analysis of Simple Apprehension |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Section 2C Analysis of Explicative Contemplation |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
Section 2D Analysis of Ramified |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
Section 2E Progress of Genetic Analysis beyond Static Analysis |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
Chapter 3 An Analysis of the Predicational Synthesis of Attribution In the Formulation of Simple Categorial Judgments |
|
|
25 | (18) |
|
Section 3A An Over-view of the Emergence of Different Meanings in the Formulation of Simple Categorial Judgments |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
Section 3B Constitution of Judgment Senses in Three Stages |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
Section 3C An Over-View of the Predicational Synthesis of Attribution |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Section 3D An Analysis of the Four Steps in the Predicational Synthesis of Attribution |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
Section 3E Critique of the Synthesis and its Structure of Predication |
|
|
35 | (8) |
|
Chapter 4 An Analysis of the Predicational Synthesis of Pluralized Thematization in the Formulation of Complex Categorial Judgments |
|
|
43 | (14) |
|
Section 4A The Emergence of Logical Sense in the Formulation of Complex Categorial Judgments |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
Section 4B General Analysis of Pluralized Thematization as a Synthesis |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
Section 4C Special Analysis of "Turning-of-Regard" of the Ego |
|
|
50 | (7) |
|
Chapter 5 Conclusion - Two Husserlian Phenomenological Questions: "Do Judgments of Perception Really Have a Predicative Structure"?; And "Do They Found Adequately Simple Categorial Judgments?". Superior Value of Genetic Over Static Analysis in Constitution |
|
|
57 | (21) |
|
Section 5A A Review of an Invalid Logical Dilemma and a Pseudo-epistemological Problem |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
Section 5B An Analysis of the Constitutional Role of the "Founding-Founded" Relationship |
|
|
58 | (8) |
|
Section 5C Correct Characterization of Static Analysis in the Relationship on Logical Investigations |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Section 5D Close Consideration of Genetic Analysis in the Scholarship on Formal and Transcendental Logic |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
Section 5E Genuine Advancement of Genetic Beyond Static Analysis in the Scholarship on Experience and Judgment |
|
|
72 | (6) |
| Footnote References |
|
78 | (10) |
| Selected Bibliography |
|
88 | (5) |
| Index |
|
93 | |
