1 Introduction |
|
1 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
1.1 Novelty and Indeterminacy |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.2 Anticipation and Tentative Governance |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
1.3 Change, Re-Interpreted and Re-Negotiated |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
|
12 | (5) |
Part 1: Variety In The Governance Of Newly Emerging Technologies |
|
|
2 Reflexive Co-Evolution and Governance Patterns |
|
|
17 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.2 Actual Reflexive Co-Evolution of Technology in Society |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
2.3 Early Warning as a Governance Pattern |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.4 Bridging the Gap between Technology Development and Society |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
2.5 Governance by Orientation: The Discourse of Grand Challenges |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (7) |
|
3 Regulatory Governance Approaches for Emerging Technologies |
|
|
35 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
3.2 Promising Regulatory Governance Approaches |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
3.2.1 Models of Technology Regulation |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Regulatory Models for Nanotechnologies |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
3.3 Reviewing Nano Regulatory Governance: The Story so Far |
|
|
42 | (10) |
|
3.3.1 Introduce Evaluation Frame of Cases: Some Effectiveness Questions |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Governance Arrangements to Limit Exposure to Nanoparticles in the Workplace |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
3.3.3 Nanocosmetics within the European Union |
|
|
47 | (5) |
|
3.4 Lessons Learned, and Moving Forward |
|
|
52 | (9) |
|
4 Society as a Laboratory to Experiment with New Technologies |
|
|
61 | (28) |
|
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
4.2 Technology as Social Experiment |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.3 A Brief History of the Idea |
|
|
65 | (4) |
|
4.3.1 Society as Laboratory |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
4.3.2 Engineering as Social Experiment |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Social Experiments in Strategic Niche Management |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Social Experiments in Social Science |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4.4 Characteristics of Social Experiments |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
4.4.1 An Experiment in Society |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.4.2 An Experiment on Society |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 An Experiment by Society |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
4.4.4 Responsible Experimentation |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
4.5 Uncertainty, Learning and Experimentation |
|
|
72 | (8) |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
4.5.2 The Need for Experimentation |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
4.5.3 Learning-by-Experimentation |
|
|
77 | (3) |
|
4.6 An Example: Sunscreens with Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
4.7 Conclusions: Towards Responsible Experimentation |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
5 Care and Techno-Science: Re-Embedding the Futures of Innovation |
|
|
89 | (26) |
|
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (7) |
|
5.2.1 Needs, Attachments and Care |
|
|
91 | (4) |
|
5.2.2 Expectations and Performing Futures |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
5.3 Disembedding: Generic Futures in Nano-and Biotechnology |
|
|
98 | (4) |
|
5.4 Care-Full Re-Embedding: Performing Concrete Futures |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
|
106 | (9) |
|
6 Division of Moral Labour as an Element in the Governance of Emerging Technologies |
|
|
115 | (16) |
|
|
7 Ethical Reflexivity as Capacity Building: Tools and Approaches |
|
|
131 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
7.2 Institutional Requirements and Opportunities to Engage in Ethical Reflexivity |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
7.3 Ethical Reflexivity and Building Capacity |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
7.4 Building Capacities: Supportive Tools and Approaches |
|
|
140 | (8) |
|
7.4.1 Articulating Reflexivity |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
7.4.2 Imagining and Discussing Societal Relevance |
|
|
142 | (5) |
|
7.4.3 Performing Reflexivity |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
7.5 Conclusions and Discussion |
|
|
148 | (11) |
Part 2: Promises, Politics And Particularities Of Nanotechnologies |
|
|
8 The Demand Side of Innovation Governance: Demand Articulation Processes In the Case of Nano-Based Sensor Technologies |
|
|
159 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
8.2 Distributed Processes of Demand Articulation |
|
|
161 | (8) |
|
8.2.1 Demand Articulation as Part of Innovation Governance |
|
|
161 | (3) |
|
8.2.2 Dynamics in Distributed Demand Articulation Processes |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
8.2.3 Interventions in Demand Articulation and Tools to Support Them |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
8.3 Demand Articulation of New Sensor Applications for the Drinking Water and Food and Beverages Sectors |
|
|
169 | (6) |
|
8.3.1 Sensors and Characteristics of the Drinking Water and Food and Beverages Sectors |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Fit and Stretch Strategies in Demand Articulation Processes |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 Sensors for Monitoring Water Quality in the Distribution Network: Fit or Stretch the Monitoring Regime? |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
8.3.4 Sensors for Monitoring Food Quality: Stretching Commercial Relationships along the Value Chain |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
8.3.5 Certification and Standardisation in Societal Embedding Articulation: Fit or Stretch |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
8.4 Supporting Demand Articulation Processes via CTA Workshops |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
|
178 | (9) |
|
9 Evolving Patterns of Governance of, and by, Expectations: The Graphene Hype Wave |
|
|
187 | (32) |
|
|
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
9.2 Governance of, and by, Expectations |
|
|
190 | (5) |
|
9.2.1 Modes of Governance |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
9.2.2 Intentional and De Facto Governance |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
9.3 The Graphene Hype Wave |
|
|
195 | (12) |
|
9.3.1 A Graphene Hype Emerging in the Science Space |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
9.3.2 Graphene Moves into the Policy and Media Space |
|
|
198 | (4) |
|
9.3.3 Graphene Moving into the Market Space and the Hype Becoming Reflexive |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
9.3.4 The Emergence of Concerns Besides the Promises and the Call for Standardisation and New Definitions of Graphene |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
|
207 | (12) |
|
10 Transactional Arrangements in the Governance of Emerging Technologies: The Case of Nanotechnology |
|
|
219 | (40) |
|
|
|
|
219 | (7) |
|
10.2 The Transnationalisation of Nanotechnology Governance |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
10.3 Transnational Governance Arrangements Generally and Their Attributes |
|
|
228 | (5) |
|
10.4 The Governance of Nanotechnology: A Typology of Transnational Governance Arrangements |
|
|
233 | (11) |
|
10.4.1 ISO Technical Committee on Nanotechnology |
|
|
233 | (3) |
|
10.4.2 OECD Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
10.4.3 International Risk Governance Council |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
10.4.4 International Council on Nanotechnology |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
10.4.5 Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
|
244 | (15) |
|
11 Co-Regulation of Nanomaterials: On Collaborative Business Association Activities Directed at Contributing to Occupational Health and Safety |
|
|
259 | (40) |
|
|
|
259 | (5) |
|
11.2 Approach to Business Association Activities |
|
|
264 | (12) |
|
11.2.1 Business Associations in Germany |
|
|
266 | (2) |
|
11.2.2 The Chemical Industry Association |
|
|
268 | (8) |
|
11.3 Discussion: Effective Nanomaterials OHS Regulation |
|
|
276 | (3) |
|
11.4 Conclusions: An Outlook to the Future of Nanomaterials OHS Regulation |
|
|
279 | (20) |
Part 3: Looking To The Future Of Disruptive Technologies |
|
|
12 The 'Metamorphosis' of the Drone: The Governance Challenges of Drone Technology and Border Surveillance |
|
|
299 | (36) |
|
|
12.1 Introduction: Let's Face It! They Are Here to Stay |
|
|
299 | (5) |
|
12.2 Drones and Border Surveillance |
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
12.3 The US Experience of Border Surveillance with Drones |
|
|
307 | (6) |
|
12.3.1 The American Drone |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
12.3.2 Legal Framework for Border Surveillance and Privacy in the US |
|
|
309 | (4) |
|
12.4 The Deployment of Drone Technology into Border Surveillance in the EU |
|
|
313 | (4) |
|
12.4.1 Border Surveillance in the EU: Frontex |
|
|
313 | (2) |
|
12.4.2 Frontex and Drones |
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
12.5 Policy Issues, Ethical and Regulatory Challenges Underlying the Political Choice of Deploying Drones for Border Surveillance |
|
|
317 | (12) |
|
12.5.1 Policy Issues Underlying the Deployment of Drones in Border Surveillance |
|
|
318 | (3) |
|
12.5.2 Ethical and Regulatory Questions |
|
|
321 | (4) |
|
12.5.3 Legal Framework for Border Surveillance and Privacy in the EU |
|
|
325 | (4) |
|
|
329 | (6) |
|
13 On the Disruptive Potential of 3D Printing |
|
|
335 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
335 | (3) |
|
13.2 A Brief Introduction to 3D Printing |
|
|
338 | (2) |
|
13.3 3D Printing in the Industrial Sector |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
13.4 3D Printing in the Biomedical Industry |
|
|
341 | (3) |
|
13.4.1 3D Printing of Biomedical Instruments and Implants for Patients |
|
|
341 | (2) |
|
13.4.2 Additive Bio-Manufacturing |
|
|
343 | (1) |
|
13.5 3D Printing in the Non-Industrial Domains |
|
|
344 | (3) |
|
|
347 | (10) |
|
14 Advanced Materials and Modified Mosquitoes: The Regulation of Nanotechnologies and Synthetic Biology |
|
|
357 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
357 | (3) |
|
14.2 Regulations: Past and Present |
|
|
360 | (6) |
|
14.2.1 Common Narratives of Early-Stage Emerging Technology Risk Governance |
|
|
361 | (1) |
|
14.2.2 Nanotechnology Regulation in the EU and Australia |
|
|
362 | (4) |
|
14.3 Synthetic Biology: The Next Evolutionary Technology |
|
|
366 | (4) |
|
14.3.1 Synthetic Biology: Early Steps to Regulation.and Governance |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
14.3.2 Synthetic Biology: The Challenges for Regulators |
|
|
368 | (2) |
|
14.4 Synthetic Biology in the Environment |
|
|
370 | (7) |
|
14.4.1 Genetically Modified Mosquitoes as Population Control: Initial Trials |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
14.4.2 Critical Response to Modified Mosquito Field Trials |
|
|
372 | (1) |
|
14.4.3 Synthetic Biology and Mosquitoes: Health Concerns and Regulatory Challenges |
|
|
373 | (2) |
|
14.4.4 Synthetic Biology and Mosquitoes: Looking Forward |
|
|
375 | (2) |
|
|
377 | (8) |
Index |
|
385 | |