Acknowledgements |
|
vii | |
Summary |
|
xi | |
Samenvatting |
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (14) |
|
2 Structuring climate adaptation through multiple perspectives: Framework and case study on flood risk management |
|
|
15 | (17) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
2.2.1 Contemporary adaptation planning perspectives |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Challenges in structuring adaptation responses |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Gap between adaptation planning and implementation |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.2.4 Understanding adaptation in a local context |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
2.4 Framework for structuring climate adaptation responses using multiple perspectives |
|
|
23 | (6) |
|
2.4.1 Ascertain the adaptation context and needs (Step -1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Bring together the multiple perspectives in adaptation context (Step 2) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 Determine the drivers of change (Step 3) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.4.4 Collate the characteristic features of adaptation measures (Step 4) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.4.5 Establish the links and compatibility between the adaptation measures across perspectives (Step 5) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.4.6 Finalise and implement adaptation measures (Step 6) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.5 Analysing climate adaptation planning and implementation in an urban context: Can Tho, Vietnam |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.5.1 Ascertain the adaptation context and needs (Step -1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.5 2 Bring together the multiple perspectives in adaptation context (Step 2) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2 5.3 Determine the drivers of change (Step 3) |
|
|
32 | (7) |
|
2.5.4 Collate the characteristic features of adaptation measures (Step 4) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.5.5 Establish the links and compatibility between the adaptation measures across perspectives (Step 5) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
2.5.6 Finalise and implement adaptation measures (Step 6) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
3 Coping capacities for improving adaptation pathways for flood protection in Can Tho, Vietnam |
|
|
39 | (16) |
|
3.1 Assessment of coping capacity along adaptation pathways |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
3.2 Methodology for assessment of coping capacity on adaptation tipping points and adaptation pathways |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
3.3 Case Study -- Can Tho, Vietnam |
|
|
44 | (8) |
|
3.3.1 Current, future situations and objectives (Step 1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Problem Assessment (Step 2) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Proposed and potential flood protection measures (Step 3) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.3.4 Social acceptance and Coping with flooding (Step 3a) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.3.5 Revising objectives to reflect coping potential (Step 3b) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
3.3.6 Determination of ATP (Step 4) |
|
|
47 | (3) |
|
3.3.7 Determination of Time of occurrence of ATPs (Step 5) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.3.8 Creating, evaluating and sequencing Adaptation Pathways (Step 6) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
4 Context specific adaptation grammar for climate adaptation in urban areas |
|
|
55 | (26) |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
4.2 The Need for context specific adaptation grammar |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
|
61 | (5) |
|
4.3.1 Exogenous scenario space |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Pathway evaluation function |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (11) |
|
4.4.1 Structuring the climate adaptation context in Can Tho |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
4.4.2 Application of context specific grammar in Can Tho |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.1 Exogenous scenario space |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.2 Adaptation modules |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
4.4.2.3 Adaptation trigger |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.4 Evaluation of adaptation pathways |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
5 Flexible adaptation planning for Water Sensitive Cities |
|
|
81 | (20) |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
5.2 Flexibility in contemporary flood risk management practices |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
5.3 Flexibility in Manufacturing |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
5.4 Flexible adaptation planning process in WSC context |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
5.5 Development of flexible adaptation planning process for WSC |
|
|
90 | (5) |
|
5.6 Practical considerations for applying WSCapp |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
6 Flexible adaptation planning in a water sensitive Melbourne |
|
|
101 | (22) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
6.3 Application of WSCapp in Elster creek, Melbourne |
|
|
104 | (16) |
|
6.3.1 Identify vision, scenarios and uncertainty |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
6.3.2 Determine drivers related to uncertainty and the changes anticipated |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Understand the attributes of adaptation measures and define range of possibilities |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
6.3.4 Identify effective adaptive measures and interactions |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
6.3.4.1 Identification of effective adaptation measures based on change propagation |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
6.3.4.2 Identification of effective adaptation measures based on interrelationships |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
6.3.5 Creating flexible design alternatives or pathways |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
6.3.6 Determine costs and benefits |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
6.3.7 Final portfolio of adaptation measures |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
7 Operationalising flexibility: Agile urban planning process |
|
|
123 | (30) |
|
7.1 Urgency and uncertainty in urban adaptation |
|
|
124 | (4) |
|
7.1.1 Addressing urgency and uncertainty in urban adaptation |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
128 | (14) |
|
7.2.1 Agility principles in Urban Development |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
7.2.2 Essential objectives and practical principles for agile urban adaptation |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
7.3 Possibilities for applying agile principles in Can Tho |
|
|
142 | (6) |
|
7.3.1 Are there generally accepted `virtual-worlds'? |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Equal importance for Type I and Type II adaptation |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 Lack of flexibility and value from the proposed adaptation measures |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
7.3.4 Stakeholders working together |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
|
153 | (8) |
|
|
161 | |