Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Forensic Anthropology - Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis [Wiley Online]

Edited by , Edited by
  • Formaat: 368 pages
  • Sari: Forensic Science in Focus
  • Ilmumisaeg: 23-Feb-2018
  • Kirjastus: John Wiley & Sons Inc
  • ISBN-10: 111922652X
  • ISBN-13: 9781119226529
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Wiley Online
  • Hind: 148,02 €*
  • * hind, mis tagab piiramatu üheaegsete kasutajate arvuga ligipääsu piiramatuks ajaks
  • Formaat: 368 pages
  • Sari: Forensic Science in Focus
  • Ilmumisaeg: 23-Feb-2018
  • Kirjastus: John Wiley & Sons Inc
  • ISBN-10: 111922652X
  • ISBN-13: 9781119226529
Teised raamatud teemal:
"Provides comprehensive coverage of everything that students and practitioners need to know about working in the field of forensic anthropology"--Provided by publisher.

Provides comprehensive coverage of everything that students and practitioners need to know about working in the field of forensic anthropology

Forensic anthropology has been plagued by questions of scientific validity and rigor despite its acceptance as a section in the American Academy of Forensic Sciences nearly half a century ago. Critics have viewed it as a laboratory-based applied subfield of biological anthropology, and characterised it as emphasising methodology over theory. This book shows that these views are not only antiquated, but inadequate and inaccurate.

Forensic Anthropology: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis introduces readers to all of the theoretical and scientific foundations of forensic anthropology — beginning with how it was influenced by the early theoretical approaches of Tyler, Morgan, Spencer and Darwin. It instructs on how modern forensic science relies on an interdisciplinary approach — with research being conducted in the fields of archaeology, physics, geology and other disciplines. This modern approach to theory in forensic anthropology is presented through the introduction and discussion of Foundational, Interpretive and Methodological theories. Sections cover: Bias and Objectivity in Forensic Anthropology Theory and Practice; The Theory and Science Behind Biological Profile and Personal Identification; Scientific Foundation for Interpretations of Antemortem, Perimortem, and Postmortem Processes; and Interdisciplinary Influences, Legal Ramifications and Future Directions.

  • Illustrates important aspects of the theory building process and reflects methods for strengthening the scientific framework of forensic anthropology as a discipline
  • Inspired by the “Application of Theory to Forensic Anthropology” symposium presented at the 67th annual meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences
  • Chapters written by experts in the field who were presenters at the symposium

Forensic Anthropology: Theoretical Framework and Scientific Basis is ideal for university courses in anthropological science, forensic science, criminal science and forensic archaeology.

About the Editors xv
Notes on contributors xvii
Foreword xxiii
Series preface xxv
Acknowledgments xxvii
1 The theoretical and scientific foundations of forensic anthropology
1(18)
C. Clifford Boyd Jr.
Donna C. Boyd
1.1 Introduction
1(1)
1.2 A selective history of theory in forensic anthropology
2(3)
1.3 A modern perspective on forensic anthropology theory
5(7)
1.3.1 Three forms of logical reasoning
8(2)
1.3.2 Theory building in forensic anthropology: Linking logic and theory
10(2)
1.4 Forensic anthropology theory and modern practice
12(3)
1.5 Final comments
15(4)
References
15(4)
Part 1 Bias and objectivity in forensic anthropology theory and practice
19(46)
2 Subjective with a capital S? Issues ol objectivity in forensic anthropology
21(18)
Allysha Powanda Winburn
2.1 Introduction
21(1)
2.2 Objectivity, subjectivity, and forensic anthropological theory
22(2)
2.3 Subjectivity in science
24(3)
2.3.1 Subjectivity in forensic anthropology
24(1)
2.3.2 Effects of bias on forensic anthropology
25(1)
2.3.3 Subjective science is not bad science
26(1)
2.4 Mitigated objectivity: A path forward
27(7)
2.4.1 Constraining subjectivity and bias
28(5)
2.4.2 The continuing process of constraint
33(1)
2.5 Conclusion
34(5)
References
34(5)
3 Navigating cognitive bias in forensic anthropology
39(14)
Michael W. Warren
Amanda N. Friend
Michala K. Stock
3.1 Introduction
39(1)
3.2 Types of cognitive bias
40(1)
3.3 Research versus applied science
41(2)
3.4 Recommended solutions to mitigate continuation bias
43(1)
3.5 Challenges unique to forensic anthropology
44(2)
3.5.1 Anthropologists work in a variety of professional contexts
44(1)
3.5.2 The uniqueness of the forensic anthropology testing sample
45(1)
3.5.3 Multiple tests to reach a single conclusion
45(1)
3.6 An example of how bias affects procedures
46(3)
3.7 Workable solutions
49(1)
3.8 Summary
49(4)
References
50(3)
4 Theoretically interesting: Different perspectives of the application of theory to forensic anthropology practice and research
53(12)
Soren Blau
4.1 Introduction
53(3)
4.2 Practising in context
56(2)
4.3 Ethical considerations for the development of theory
58(1)
4.4 Can theories be applied universally?
59(1)
4.5 Conclusion
59(6)
Acknowledgements
61(1)
References
61(4)
Part 2 The theory and science behind biological profile and personal identification
65(84)
5 From Blumenbach to Howells: The slow, painful emergence of theory through forensic race estimation
67(32)
Stephen Ousley
Richard L. Jantz
Joseph T. Hefner
5.1 Introduction
67(1)
5.2 Race as a concept and theory
68(11)
5.2.1 Evolution, rather than race, explains human biological variation
70(2)
5.2.2 Human variation is continuous
72(1)
5.2.3 Human biological variation involves many traits that typically vary independently
73(1)
5.2.4 Genetic variation within so-called races is much greater than the variation among them
74(1)
5.2.5 There is no way to consistently classify human beings by race
75(4)
5.3 Anthropology and race
79(6)
5.4 Forensic anthropology and race
85(5)
5.5 Race and the future
90(9)
Acknowledgments
92(1)
References
92(7)
6 The application of theory in skeletal age estimation
99(14)
Natalie R. Langley
Beatrix Dudzik
6.1 Introduction
99(2)
6.2 Skeletal age
101(1)
6.3 Historical context
101(1)
6.4 Forensic anthropology and evolutionary biology
102(3)
6.5 Potential solutions to the problem of age estimation
105(2)
6.6 Final comments
107(6)
References
109(4)
7 Theory and histological methods
113(14)
Christian M. Crowder
Deborrah C. Pinto
Janna M. Andronowski
Victoria M. Dominguez
7.1 Introduction
113(1)
7.2 Foundational theory in bone biology
114(1)
7.3 Interpretive theory in bone biology
115(4)
7.3.1 Form and function
115(1)
7.3.2 The mechanostat and Utah paradigm
116(1)
7.3.3 Exploring the effectors of the mechanostat
117(2)
7.4 Methodological theory in bone biology
119(3)
7.4.1 Histological age estimation
120(1)
7.4.2 Determining human versus nonhuman bone
121(1)
7.5 Conclusions
122(5)
References
123(4)
8 Forensic applications of isotope landscapes ("isoscapes"): A tool for predicting region-of-origin in forensic anthropology cases
127(22)
Lesley A. Chesson
Brett J. Tipple
James R. Ehleringer
Todd Park
Eric J. Bartelink
8.1 Introduction
127(1)
8.2 What are isotopes?
128(1)
8.3 Why do isotope compositions of human tissues differ?
129(4)
8.3.1 Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes
130(1)
8.3.2 Strontium isotopes
130(2)
8.3.3 Carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotopes
132(1)
8.4 How do we interpret isotope data collected for forensic human identification?
133(6)
8.4.1 Oxygen isotopes in drinking water and hair keratin
134(3)
8.4.2 Oxygen isotopes in drinking water and skeletal bioapatite
137(1)
8.4.3 Strontium isotopes of local bedrock and skeletal remains
138(1)
8.5 Examples of the application of isotope analysis to unidentified remains
139(5)
8.5.1 Jane Doe from Salt Lake County
139(2)
8.5.2 Mandible from Siskiyou County
141(3)
8.6 What are the future applications of isotope analysis?
144(5)
Acknowledgments
144(1)
References
145(4)
Part 3 Scientific foundation for interpretations of antemortem, perimortem, and postmortem processes
149(122)
9 The anatomical basis for fracture repair: Recognition of the healing continuum and its forensic applications to investigations of pediatric and elderly abuse
151(50)
Donna C. Boyd
9.1 Introduction: Diagnosing pediatric and elderly non-accidental injury
151(2)
9.2 Theoretical basis for fracture healing and TSI estimation
153(1)
9.3 Anatomical basis for fracture healing
154(8)
9.3.1 Bone growth and development
155(2)
9.3.2 Fracture healing
157(5)
9.4 Factors affecting the rate of bone healing
162(4)
9.4.1 The biological profile (age, sex, ancestry)
162(1)
9.4.2 Type, location, cause, severity, and number of injuries
163(1)
9.4.3 Injury treatment and local biomechanical factors
164(1)
9.4.4 Systemic and other factors
165(1)
9.5 Fracture healing stages and dating systems
166(8)
9.6 A new model for fracture repair
174(7)
9.7 Expanding and refining TSI estimation through the Antemortem Fracture Archive
181(3)
9.8 Theory and the future of TSI estimation
184(17)
References
184(11)
Appendix A
195(1)
Major fracture repair stages and TSI estimations
195(6)
10 Theoretical foundation of child abuse
201(12)
Jennifer C. Love
Miriam E. Soto Martinez
10.1 Introduction
201(1)
10.2 Case study
201(1)
10.3 Anthropologists and child abuse
202(1)
10.4 Foundational theory
203(1)
10.5 Interpretive theory
204(3)
10.5.1 Bone biomechanics
205(2)
10.5.2 Motor skill development
207(1)
10.6 Methodological theory
207(2)
10.7 Conclusion
209(4)
References
209(4)
11 Bone trauma analysis in a forensic setting: Theorelical basis and a practical approach for evaluation
213(22)
Hugh E. Berryman
John F. Berryman
Tiffany B. Saul
11.1 Introduction
213(1)
11.2 Theory
214(4)
11.2.1 Foundational theory
215(1)
11.2.2 Interpretive theory
216(1)
11.2.3 Methodological theory
217(1)
11.3 Fundamental principles in bone fracture interpretation
218(8)
11.4 A practical approach to bone trauma evaluation and hypothesis building
226(6)
11.5 Conclusion
232(3)
References
232(3)
12 Thinking outside the box: Theory and innovation in sharp trauma analysis
235(16)
John A. Williams
Ronald W. Davis
12.1 Introduction
235(1)
12.2 Transfer of evidence
235(1)
12.3 Theory connections
236(1)
12.4 The human skeleton as transfer evidence
237(1)
12.5 A primer on saws and dismemberment
238(2)
12.6 Geographic information system
240(1)
12.7 Applications of GIS in forensic anthropology and human osteology
241(1)
12.8 GIS: innovation in cut mark striatum interpretation
242(5)
12.9 Locard and the twenty-first century: It's all a matter of scale
247(4)
References
248(3)
13 The forensic anthropologist as broker for cross-disciplinary taphonomic research related to estimating the postmortem interval in medicolegal death investigations
251(20)
Daniel J. Wescott
13.1 Introduction
251(1)
13.2 Taphonomy and taphonomic theory
252(2)
13.3 Forensic taphonomy
254(1)
13.4 Taphonomy and the estimation of time since death
255(1)
13.5 The necrobiome
256(1)
13.6 Cross-disciplinary research
257(5)
13.6.1 Need for cross-disciplinary research in PMI estimation
257(1)
13.6.2 Cross-disciplinary approaches
258(4)
13.7 Overcoming barriers to cross-disciplinary research
262(2)
13.8 Forensic anthropologists as brokers for unified theories in forensic taphonomy
264(1)
13.8.1 Forensic anthropologists are already major players
264(1)
13.8.2 Anthropologists have a long history of conducting taphonomic research
264(1)
13.8.3 Anthropology is traditionally a holistic field
265(1)
13.8.4 Forensic anthropology has its roots in academic research
265(1)
13.9 Conclusions
265(6)
Acknowledgments
266(1)
References
266(5)
Part 4 Interdisciplinary influences, legal ramifications, and future directions
271(58)
14 Archaeological inference and its application to forensic anthropology
273(24)
C. Clifford Boyd Jr.
William W. Baden
14.1 Introduction
273(1)
14.2 Agency and nonlinear systems theories
274(3)
14.3 Nonlinear modeling of the decomposition process
277(7)
14.4 Discussion
284(13)
References
292(5)
15 Arrows of influence: The give and take of theory between forensic anthropology, archaeology, and geophysics
297(10)
John F. Schweikart
Cheryl A. Johnston
15.1 Introduction
297(2)
15.2 Influences of archaeology on forensic anthropology
299(2)
15.3 Influences of geophysics on forensic anthropology
301(1)
15.4 "Backflow" to other disciplines: Site formation processes in archaeology
302(1)
15.5 Backflow: Interpretation/understanding of geophysical signatures
303(2)
15.6 Conclusion
305(2)
References
305(2)
16 Forensic anthropology, scientific evidence, and the law: Why theory matters
307(18)
Donna C. Boyd
C. Clifford Boyd Jr.
16.1 Introduction: Theory in practice
307(2)
16.1.1 Commonwealth of Virginia v Lockett: Why theory matters
307(2)
16.2 Science and the law: The disconnect
309(1)
16.3 Science and the law: Commonalities
310(5)
16.3.1 Legal and scientific dialogue
310(1)
16.3.2 Abductive reasoning
311(1)
16.3.3 Probabilistic evaluation of the strength of evidence
312(3)
16.4 Forensic anthropologists as expert witnesses
315(1)
16.5 Admissibility of forensic anthropology evidence in the post-Daubert world
316(2)
16.6 The legal application of forensic anthropology: Why theory matters
318(1)
16.7 Final comments
319(6)
Acknowledgments
320(1)
References
320(5)
17 Epilogue: Theory and science in forensic anthropology: Avenues for further research and development
325(4)
C. Clifford Boyd Jr.
Donna C. Boyd
17.1 The science of forensic anthropology
325(2)
17.2 Looking forward
327(2)
References
328(1)
Index 329
Edited by

C. Clifford Boyd Jr, PhD, RPA, is currently a Professor of Anthropological Sciences at Radford University, Virginia, Co-Director of the RU Forensic Science Institute, and Consultant for the Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.

Donna C. Boyd, PhD, D-ABFA, is Eminent Professor of Anthropological Sciences at Radford University, Co-Director of the RU Forensic Science Institute, Professor of Biomedical Science at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, and Consultant for the Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner.