| About the Editors |
|
xv | |
| Notes on contributors |
|
xvii | |
| Foreword |
|
xxiii | |
| Series preface |
|
xxv | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xxvii | |
|
1 The theoretical and scientific foundations of forensic anthropology |
|
|
1 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 A selective history of theory in forensic anthropology |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
1.3 A modern perspective on forensic anthropology theory |
|
|
5 | (7) |
|
1.3.1 Three forms of logical reasoning |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.3.2 Theory building in forensic anthropology: Linking logic and theory |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
1.4 Forensic anthropology theory and modern practice |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
Part 1 Bias and objectivity in forensic anthropology theory and practice |
|
|
19 | (46) |
|
2 Subjective with a capital S? Issues ol objectivity in forensic anthropology |
|
|
21 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.2 Objectivity, subjectivity, and forensic anthropological theory |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.3 Subjectivity in science |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
2.3.1 Subjectivity in forensic anthropology |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Effects of bias on forensic anthropology |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Subjective science is not bad science |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.4 Mitigated objectivity: A path forward |
|
|
27 | (7) |
|
2.4.1 Constraining subjectivity and bias |
|
|
28 | (5) |
|
2.4.2 The continuing process of constraint |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
|
|
34 | (5) |
|
3 Navigating cognitive bias in forensic anthropology |
|
|
39 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
3.2 Types of cognitive bias |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3.3 Research versus applied science |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3.4 Recommended solutions to mitigate continuation bias |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.5 Challenges unique to forensic anthropology |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
3.5.1 Anthropologists work in a variety of professional contexts |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 The uniqueness of the forensic anthropology testing sample |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.5.3 Multiple tests to reach a single conclusion |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.6 An example of how bias affects procedures |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
4 Theoretically interesting: Different perspectives of the application of theory to forensic anthropology practice and research |
|
|
53 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
4.2 Practising in context |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
4.3 Ethical considerations for the development of theory |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
4.4 Can theories be applied universally? |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
|
59 | (6) |
|
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
|
61 | (4) |
|
Part 2 The theory and science behind biological profile and personal identification |
|
|
65 | (84) |
|
5 From Blumenbach to Howells: The slow, painful emergence of theory through forensic race estimation |
|
|
67 | (32) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
5.2 Race as a concept and theory |
|
|
68 | (11) |
|
5.2.1 Evolution, rather than race, explains human biological variation |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
5.2.2 Human variation is continuous |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Human biological variation involves many traits that typically vary independently |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
5.2.4 Genetic variation within so-called races is much greater than the variation among them |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
5.2.5 There is no way to consistently classify human beings by race |
|
|
75 | (4) |
|
5.3 Anthropology and race |
|
|
79 | (6) |
|
5.4 Forensic anthropology and race |
|
|
85 | (5) |
|
|
|
90 | (9) |
|
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
|
92 | (7) |
|
6 The application of theory in skeletal age estimation |
|
|
99 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
6.4 Forensic anthropology and evolutionary biology |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
6.5 Potential solutions to the problem of age estimation |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
|
107 | (6) |
|
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
7 Theory and histological methods |
|
|
113 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
7.2 Foundational theory in bone biology |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
7.3 Interpretive theory in bone biology |
|
|
115 | (4) |
|
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 The mechanostat and Utah paradigm |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
7.3.3 Exploring the effectors of the mechanostat |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
7.4 Methodological theory in bone biology |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
7.4.1 Histological age estimation |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Determining human versus nonhuman bone |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
|
122 | (5) |
|
|
|
123 | (4) |
|
8 Forensic applications of isotope landscapes ("isoscapes"): A tool for predicting region-of-origin in forensic anthropology cases |
|
|
127 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
8.3 Why do isotope compositions of human tissues differ? |
|
|
129 | (4) |
|
8.3.1 Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
8.3.3 Carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotopes |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
8.4 How do we interpret isotope data collected for forensic human identification? |
|
|
133 | (6) |
|
8.4.1 Oxygen isotopes in drinking water and hair keratin |
|
|
134 | (3) |
|
8.4.2 Oxygen isotopes in drinking water and skeletal bioapatite |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Strontium isotopes of local bedrock and skeletal remains |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
8.5 Examples of the application of isotope analysis to unidentified remains |
|
|
139 | (5) |
|
8.5.1 Jane Doe from Salt Lake County |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
8.5.2 Mandible from Siskiyou County |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
8.6 What are the future applications of isotope analysis? |
|
|
144 | (5) |
|
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
Part 3 Scientific foundation for interpretations of antemortem, perimortem, and postmortem processes |
|
|
149 | (122) |
|
9 The anatomical basis for fracture repair: Recognition of the healing continuum and its forensic applications to investigations of pediatric and elderly abuse |
|
|
151 | (50) |
|
|
|
9.1 Introduction: Diagnosing pediatric and elderly non-accidental injury |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
9.2 Theoretical basis for fracture healing and TSI estimation |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
9.3 Anatomical basis for fracture healing |
|
|
154 | (8) |
|
9.3.1 Bone growth and development |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
|
|
157 | (5) |
|
9.4 Factors affecting the rate of bone healing |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
9.4.1 The biological profile (age, sex, ancestry) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Type, location, cause, severity, and number of injuries |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
9.4.3 Injury treatment and local biomechanical factors |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
9.4.4 Systemic and other factors |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
9.5 Fracture healing stages and dating systems |
|
|
166 | (8) |
|
9.6 A new model for fracture repair |
|
|
174 | (7) |
|
9.7 Expanding and refining TSI estimation through the Antemortem Fracture Archive |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
9.8 Theory and the future of TSI estimation |
|
|
184 | (17) |
|
|
|
184 | (11) |
|
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
Major fracture repair stages and TSI estimations |
|
|
195 | (6) |
|
10 Theoretical foundation of child abuse |
|
|
201 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
10.3 Anthropologists and child abuse |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
10.5.2 Motor skill development |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
10.6 Methodological theory |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
11 Bone trauma analysis in a forensic setting: Theorelical basis and a practical approach for evaluation |
|
|
213 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
|
214 | (4) |
|
11.2.1 Foundational theory |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Interpretive theory |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
11.2.3 Methodological theory |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
11.3 Fundamental principles in bone fracture interpretation |
|
|
218 | (8) |
|
11.4 A practical approach to bone trauma evaluation and hypothesis building |
|
|
226 | (6) |
|
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
12 Thinking outside the box: Theory and innovation in sharp trauma analysis |
|
|
235 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
12.2 Transfer of evidence |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
12.4 The human skeleton as transfer evidence |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
12.5 A primer on saws and dismemberment |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
12.6 Geographic information system |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
12.7 Applications of GIS in forensic anthropology and human osteology |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
12.8 GIS: innovation in cut mark striatum interpretation |
|
|
242 | (5) |
|
12.9 Locard and the twenty-first century: It's all a matter of scale |
|
|
247 | (4) |
|
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
13 The forensic anthropologist as broker for cross-disciplinary taphonomic research related to estimating the postmortem interval in medicolegal death investigations |
|
|
251 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
13.2 Taphonomy and taphonomic theory |
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
13.4 Taphonomy and the estimation of time since death |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
13.6 Cross-disciplinary research |
|
|
257 | (5) |
|
13.6.1 Need for cross-disciplinary research in PMI estimation |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
13.6.2 Cross-disciplinary approaches |
|
|
258 | (4) |
|
13.7 Overcoming barriers to cross-disciplinary research |
|
|
262 | (2) |
|
13.8 Forensic anthropologists as brokers for unified theories in forensic taphonomy |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
13.8.1 Forensic anthropologists are already major players |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
13.8.2 Anthropologists have a long history of conducting taphonomic research |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
13.8.3 Anthropology is traditionally a holistic field |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
13.8.4 Forensic anthropology has its roots in academic research |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
|
265 | (6) |
|
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
|
266 | (5) |
|
Part 4 Interdisciplinary influences, legal ramifications, and future directions |
|
|
271 | (58) |
|
14 Archaeological inference and its application to forensic anthropology |
|
|
273 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
14.2 Agency and nonlinear systems theories |
|
|
274 | (3) |
|
14.3 Nonlinear modeling of the decomposition process |
|
|
277 | (7) |
|
|
|
284 | (13) |
|
|
|
292 | (5) |
|
15 Arrows of influence: The give and take of theory between forensic anthropology, archaeology, and geophysics |
|
|
297 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 | (2) |
|
15.2 Influences of archaeology on forensic anthropology |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
15.3 Influences of geophysics on forensic anthropology |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
15.4 "Backflow" to other disciplines: Site formation processes in archaeology |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
15.5 Backflow: Interpretation/understanding of geophysical signatures |
|
|
303 | (2) |
|
|
|
305 | (2) |
|
|
|
305 | (2) |
|
16 Forensic anthropology, scientific evidence, and the law: Why theory matters |
|
|
307 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
16.1 Introduction: Theory in practice |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
16.1.1 Commonwealth of Virginia v Lockett: Why theory matters |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
16.2 Science and the law: The disconnect |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
16.3 Science and the law: Commonalities |
|
|
310 | (5) |
|
16.3.1 Legal and scientific dialogue |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
16.3.2 Abductive reasoning |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
16.3.3 Probabilistic evaluation of the strength of evidence |
|
|
312 | (3) |
|
16.4 Forensic anthropologists as expert witnesses |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
16.5 Admissibility of forensic anthropology evidence in the post-Daubert world |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
16.6 The legal application of forensic anthropology: Why theory matters |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
|
|
319 | (6) |
|
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
|
|
320 | (5) |
|
17 Epilogue: Theory and science in forensic anthropology: Avenues for further research and development |
|
|
325 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 The science of forensic anthropology |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
|
|
327 | (2) |
|
|
|
328 | (1) |
| Index |
|
329 | |