Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xix | |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
Chapter 2 Trends toward Lethality |
|
|
7 | (22) |
|
2.1 Weaponized Unmanned Ground Vehicles |
|
|
10 | (11) |
|
2.2 Weaponized Unmanned Aerial Vehicles |
|
|
21 | (5) |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
Chapter 3 Human Failings in the Battlefield |
|
|
29 | (8) |
|
Chapter 4 Related Philosophical Thought |
|
|
37 | (12) |
|
Chapter 5 What People Think: Opinions on Lethal Autonomous Systems |
|
|
49 | (8) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
Chapter 6 Formalization for Ethical Control |
|
|
57 | (12) |
|
6.1 Formal Methods for Describing Behavior |
|
|
58 | (4) |
|
6.1.1 Range of Responses: R |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 The Stimulus Domain: S |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
6.1.3 The Behavioral Mapping: β |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
|
62 | (7) |
|
Chapter 7 Specific Issues for Lethality: What to Represent |
|
|
69 | (24) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (10) |
|
|
81 | (12) |
|
7.3.1 Standing Rules of Engagement |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
7.3.2 Rules of Engagement (Non-SROE) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
7.3.3 Rules for the Use of Force |
|
|
86 | (5) |
|
7.3.4 ROE for Peace Enforcement Missions |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
Chapter 8 Representational Choices: How to Represent Ethics in a Lethal Robot |
|
|
93 | (22) |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
8.2 Generalism---Reasoning from Moral Principles |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
8.2.2 Utilitarian Methods |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
8.2.3 Kantian Rule-Based Methods |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
8.3 Particularism: Case-Based Reasoning |
|
|
104 | (4) |
|
8.4 Ethical Decision Making |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
Chapter 9 Architectural Considerations for Governing Lethality |
|
|
115 | (10) |
|
9.1 Architectural Requirements |
|
|
119 | (6) |
|
Chapter 10 Design Options |
|
|
125 | (30) |
|
|
127 | (6) |
|
10.2 Ethical Behavioral Control |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
10.3.1 After-Action Reflection |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
10.3.2 Affective Restriction of Behavior |
|
|
140 | (3) |
|
10.4 Responsibility Advisor |
|
|
143 | (12) |
|
10.4.1 Command Authorization for a Mission Involving Autonomous Lethal Force |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
10.4.2 Design for Mission Command Authorization |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
10.4.3 The Use of Ethical Overrides |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
10.4.4 Design for Overriding Ethical Control |
|
|
152 | (3) |
|
Chapter 11 Example Scenarios for the Ethical Use of Force |
|
|
155 | (22) |
|
11.1 Taliban Muster in Cemetery |
|
|
157 | (5) |
|
11.2 "Apache Rules the Night" |
|
|
162 | (5) |
|
11.3 Korean Demilitarized Zone |
|
|
167 | (4) |
|
|
171 | (6) |
|
Chapter 12 A Prototype Implementation |
|
|
177 | (34) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
12.2 A Prototype Implementation of the Ethical Governor |
|
|
178 | (18) |
|
12.2.1 Ethical Constraints |
|
|
179 | (3) |
|
12.2.2 Evidential Reasoning |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
12.2.3 Constraint Application |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
12.2.4 Proportionality and Battlefield Carnage |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
12.2.5 Demonstration Scenario Overview |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
12.2.6 Scenario 1---Suppressing Unethical Behavior |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
12.2.7 Scenario 2---Maintaining Ethical Behavior While Minimizing Collateral Damage |
|
|
192 | (4) |
|
12.3 Implementing the Responsibility Advisor |
|
|
196 | (13) |
|
12.3.1 Establishing Responsibility When Tasking an Autonomous System Capable of Lethal Force |
|
|
196 | (6) |
|
12.3.2 Run-Time Responsibility Advising and Operator Overrides |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
12.3.2.1 Continuous Presentation of the Status of the Ethical Governor |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
12.3.2.2 Negative Overrides: Denying Permission to Fire in the Presence of Obligating Constraints |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
12.3.2.3 Positive Overrides: Granting Permission to Fire in the Presence of Forbidding Ethical Constraints |
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
|
209 | (2) |
Epilogue |
|
211 | (2) |
References |
|
213 | (12) |
Appendix A Relevant Laws of War |
|
225 | (18) |
Appendix B Acronyms |
|
243 | (2) |
Appendix C Notation |
|
245 | (2) |
Index |
|
247 | |