Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Improving Flood Prediction Assimilating Uncertain Crowdsourced Data into Hydrologic and Hydraulic Models [Taylor & Francis e-raamat]

(UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands)
  • Taylor & Francis e-raamat
  • Hind: 281,59 €*
  • * hind, mis tagab piiramatu üheaegsete kasutajate arvuga ligipääsu piiramatuks ajaks
  • Tavahind: 402,26 €
  • Säästad 30%

In recent years, the continued technological advances have stimulated the spread of low-cost sensors which triggered crowdsourcing as a way to obtain observations of hydrological variables in a more distributed way than the classic static physical sensors. The main advantage of using these type of sensors is that they can be used not only by technicians but also by regular citizens. However, due to their relatively limited reliability and varying accuracy in time and space, crowdsourced observations have not been widely integrated in hydrological and/or hydraulic models for flood forecasting applications. Instead, they have generally been used to validate model results against observations, in post-event analyses.

This research aims to investigate the benefits of assimilating the crowdsourced observations, coming from a distributed network of heterogeneous physical and social (static and dynamic) sensors, within hydrological and hydraulic models, in order to improve flood forecasting. The results of this study demonstrate that crowdsourced observations can significantly improve flood prediction if properly integrated in hydrological and hydraulic models. This can be a potential application of recent efforts to build citizen observatories of water, in which citizens not only can play an active role in information capturing, evaluation and communication, but also can help improving models and thus increase flood resilience.

Acknoledgments i
Summary iii
Samenvatting vii
Sommario xi
1 Introduction
1(26)
1.1 Background
1(16)
1.1.1 Flood forecasting and early warning systems
1(2)
1.1.2 Hydrological and hydrodynamic modelling
3(4)
1.1.3 Uncertainty in hydrological and hydrodynamic modelling
7(2)
1.1.1 Data assimilation
9(4)
1.1.5 Citizen Science
13(4)
1.2 Motivation
17(3)
1.3 Terminology
20(2)
1.4 Research objectives
22(1)
1.5 Outline of the thesis
23(4)
2 Case studies and models
27(30)
2.1 Introduction
28(1)
2.2 Case 1 - Brue Catchment (UK)
28(8)
2.2.1 Catchment description
28(1)
2.2.2 Model description
29(7)
2.3 Case 2 - Bacchiglione Catchment (Italy)
36(12)
2.3.1 Catchment description
36(1)
2.3.2 Model description
37(11)
2.4 Case 3 - Trinity and Sabine Rivers (USA)
48(7)
2.4.1 Rivers description
48(2)
2.4.2 Model description
50(5)
2.5 Case 4 - Synthetic river reach
55(2)
3 Data assimilation methods
57(12)
3.1 Introduction
58(2)
3.2 Direct insertion
60(1)
3.3 Nudging scheme
60(1)
3.4 Kalman Filter
61(3)
3.5 Ensemble Kalman Filter
64(2)
3.6 Asynchronous Ensemble Kalman Filter
66(3)
4 Assimilation of synchronous data in hydrological models
69(38)
4.1 Introduction
70(2)
4.2 Methodology
72(3)
4.2.1 Assimilation of intermittent observations
72(1)
4.2.2 Observation and model error
73(1)
4.2.3 Generation of synthetic observations
74(1)
4.3 Experimental setup
75(9)
4.3.1 Experiment 4.1: Streamflow data from static physical (StPh) sensors
75(5)
4.3.2 Experiment 4.2: Streamflow data from static social (StSc) sensors
80(1)
4.3.3 Experiment 4.3: Intermittent streamflow data from static social (StSc) sensors
81(1)
4.3.4 Experiment 4.4: Heterogeneous network of static physical (StPh) and static social (StSc) sensors
82(2)
4.4 Results and discussion
84(20)
4.4.1 Experiment 4.1
85(11)
4.4.2 Experiment 4.2
96(1)
4.4.3 Experiment 4.3
97(5)
4.4.4 Experiment 4.4
102(2)
4.5 Conclusions
104(3)
5 Assimilation of asynchronous data in hydrological models
107(24)
5.1 Introduction
108(1)
5.2 Methodology
109(4)
5.2.1 Assimilation of asynchronous observations
110(2)
5.2.2 Observation and model error
112(1)
5.2.3 Generation of synthetic observations
112(1)
5.3 Experimental setup
113(3)
5.3.1 Experiment 5.1: Observations from a single static social (StSc) sensor
113(2)
5.3.2 Experiments 5.2: Observations from distributed static physical (StPh) and static social (StSc) sensors
115(1)
5.4 Results and discussion
116(12)
5.4.1 Experiment 5.1
116(7)
5.4.2 Experiment 5.2
123(5)
5.5 Conclusions
128(3)
6 Assimilation of synchronous data in hydraulic models
131(32)
6.1 Introduction
132(1)
6.2 Methodology
133(5)
6.2.1 Data assimilation methods
134(1)
6.2.2 Observation and model error
134(4)
6.2.3 Streamflow observations
138(1)
6.3 Experimental setup
138(2)
6.3.1 Experiment 6.1: Effect of different DA methods
138(1)
6.3.2 Experiment 6.2: Effect of sensors location on KF performances
139(1)
6.4 Results and discussions
140(21)
6.4.1 Experiment 6.1
140(10)
6.4.2 Experiment 6.2
150(11)
6.5 Conclusions
161(2)
7 Assimilation of synchronous data in a cascade of models
163(25)
7.1 Introduction
164(2)
7.2 Methodology
166(2)
7.2.1 Data assimilation method
166(1)
7.2.2 Observation and model error
166(1)
7.2.3 Generation of synthetic observations
167(1)
7.3 Experimental setup
168(7)
7.3.1 Experiment 7.1: Assimilation of data from static physical (StPh) sensors
168(1)
7.3.2 Experiment 7.2: Assimilation of data from static social (StSc) sensors
168(1)
7.3.3 Experiment 7.3: Assimilation of data from dynamic social (DySc) sensors
169(1)
7.3.4 Experiment 7.4: Realistic scenarios of engagements
170(5)
7.4 Results and discussion
175(11)
7.4.1 Experiment 7.1
175(1)
7.4.2 Experiment 7.2
176(4)
7.4.3 Experiment 7.3
180(3)
7.4.4 Experiment 7.4
183(3)
7.5 Conclusions
186(2)
8 Conclusions and recommendations
188(9)
8.1 Overview
188(1)
8.2 Research outcomes
189(6)
8.3 Limitations and recommendations
195(2)
References 197(32)
List of acronyms 229(4)
List of Table 233(2)
List of Figures 235(10)
About the author 245
Maurizio Mazzoleni was born in Brescia in November 1986. Mr. Mazzoleni graduated from University of Brescia, in Brescia, Italy, in May 2011. During his university studies he continued to pursue his interest in the flood protection by moving to UNESCO-IHE with the support of a scholarship awarded by University of Brescia to carry out his Master Thesis. Afterwards, he cooperate for 1 year within the KULTURisk Project as research fellow of the University of Brescia. Currently, Mr. Mazzoleni is a PhD candidate at UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education under the Department of Integrated Water Systems and Governance, Delft, The Netherlands. His research interest include hydrologic and hydrodynamic modelling, in particular he dealt with issue related to flood forecasting, data assimilation, flood inundation mapping, flood risk and uncertainty analysis, flood defence systems design and reliability analysis, statistical hydrology.