Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Judicial Control in the European Union: Reforming Jurisdiction in the Intergovernmental Pillars [Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud]

(William Golding Junior Research Fellow, Brasenose College, British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, and Assistant Professor, McGill University)
  • Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud
  • Raamatu hind pole hetkel teada
The EU's activity under its intergovernmental pillars - The Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs - has traditionally been beyond the scope of judicial control offered by the central EC legal system. The increasing importance of this activity, and its growing intrusion into the lives of individuals, has led to a sense that the level of judicial oversight and protection is insufficient and that the constitutional balance of the Union stands in urgent need of reform. While the need for reform is widely recognised, wholesale constitutional change has been stalled by the failure to ratify the Constitutional Treaty and the delay in ratifying the Treaty of Lisbon.

This book charts the attempts to develop more satisfactory judicial control over the intergovernmental pillars in the face of such constitutional inertia. It examines the leading role played by the European Court of Justice in reforming its own jurisdiction, and analyses the ECJ's development as a constitutional court in comparison with more established constitutional adjudicators. Throughout the book the current constitutional position is compared extensively to the reforms introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, offering a timely snapshot of the EU's federal structure in a state of flux.
Acknowledgments v
Table of Cases
ix
Introduction: The ECJ as a Federal Constitutional Court
1(13)
The Context: Models of Constitutional Review
2(2)
The ECJ as a Federal Constitutional Court
4(8)
The ECJ as a Constitutional Court in the Second and Third Pillars
12(2)
Judicial Control in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
14(108)
Introduction
14(2)
The Nature of AFSJ Measures
16(39)
Legal Effects of Third Pillar Measures: Terminology
19(10)
Legal Effects of AFSJ Measures before the Lisbon Treaty
29(20)
Legal Effects of AFSJ Measures after the Lisbon Treaty
49(6)
The Jurisdiction of the ECJ at Present
55(40)
The Area within the First Pillar (Title IV EC)
56(11)
The Third Pillar (Title VI TEU)
67(28)
Cherry-Picking: Institutional Ways to Fix Problems without the Constitutional Treaty
95(5)
The Court's Case-Law
95(1)
The Commission's Proposals
96(3)
The Reform/Lisbon Treaty
99(1)
The Jurisdiction of the ECJ under the Lisbon Treaty
100(20)
Direct Review of AFSJ Measures
101(5)
Indirect Review of AFSJ Measures
106(7)
Policing the Borders between the AFSJ and other Policies
113(1)
Infringement Proceedings, Failure to Act, Damages
114(3)
Judicial Control of AFSJ Bodies
117(3)
Final Remarks
120(2)
Judicial Control in the Common Foreign and Security Policy
122(61)
Introduction
122(2)
The Nature of CFSP Measures
124(4)
At Present
124(2)
CFSP Measures after the Lisbon Treaty
126(2)
The Jurisdiction of the ECJ in CFSP at Present
128(21)
Policing the Boundaries
129(4)
Review of CFSP Measures
133(16)
The Jurisdiction of the ECJ Under the Lisbon Treaty
149(16)
Primacy
150(2)
Policing the Borders
152(2)
The Protection of Individuals against Restrictive Measures
154(10)
Judicial Control of International Agreements
164(1)
What the CFSP is Missing and its Consequences
165(18)
The Role of the ECJ
165(4)
The National Comparison
169(5)
A Likely Response from National Constitutional Courts
174(5)
The Control of the ECtHR
179(4)
Concluding Remarks: A Constitutional Court for the EU?
183(12)
The Lisbon Treaty
190(5)
Bibliography 195(12)
Index 207
Alicia Hinarejos is the William Golding Junior Research Fellow at Brasenose College, Oxford, a British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow at the Faculty of Law, University of Oxford, and an Assistant Professor at McGill University