"In Karl Jaspers' Theory of Irrationality, Daniel Adsett explains how a Jaspersian view of irrationality makes better sense of the irrationality of delusions and worldviews than competing views, offering a novel contribution to contemporary debates aboutthe character of reason"--
In Karl Jaspers’ Theory of Irrationality, Daniel Adsett explains how a Jaspersian view of irrationality makes better sense of the irrationality of delusions and worldviews than competing views, offering a novel contribution to contemporary debates about the character of reason.
Defending the view that Karl Jaspers’ concept of irrationality (Widervernunft) is better able to account for pathological patterns of individual and collective thinking, Karl Jaspers’ Theory of Irrationality: From Delusions to Worldviews argues that irrationality is incorrigibility, a blockage of reason as the will to communication. Highlighting the importance of freedom and creativity at the heart of reason (Vernunft), Daniel Adsett analyzes examples of delusional thought through a Jaspersian lens. He shows that irrationality arises when we hold to certain attitudes with an incorrigible conviction and refuse to genuinely consider the possibility that we might need to revise or change our beliefs. In presenting these arguments, Adsett offers a novel contribution to contemporary debates about the character of reason while rehabilitating an often neglected aspect of Jaspers’ thought.
Reviews
Karl Jaspers Theory of Irrationality: From Delusions to Worldviews is a substantive analysis and critique of Karl Jaspers theory of irrationality. The nuanced exposition and interpretation of Jaspersian irrationality engages contemporary philosophers who espouse foundationalist, coherentist and normative understandings of irrationality. Daniel Adsett engages contemporary philosophers of reason with specific reference to Jaspers distinction between delusions proper and delusion-like ideas (General Psychopathology) and convincingly argues the case for the irrationality of delusions as a form of incorrigibility. The work teases out highly relevant implications of Jaspersian reason and irrationality for putative comprehensive reductionist worldviews that profess absolute knowledge of the individual (Psychoanalysis), world (Marxism) and God (dogmatic theology) and suggests the current-day relevance of Jaspers account of irrationality for contemporary political discourses and new developments of artificial intelligence. While a sympathetic reading of Jaspers theory of irrationality, Karl Jaspers Theory of Irrationalitycloses with a compelling critique of the idea of the Encompassing and method of Periechontology that appeals to Jaspers concept of Foundering as a way to understand some of the tensive contradictions in Jaspersian philosophizing. Wide-ranging in scope, meticulous in reference, and well-written, Adsetts book deserves a wide readership and reception. -- Gregory J. Walters, Saint Paul University/Université Saint-Paul
More info
In Karl Jaspers Theory of Irrationality, Daniel Adsett explains how a Jaspersian view of irrationality makes better sense of the irrationality of delusions and worldviews than competing views, offering a novel contribution to contemporary debates about the character of reason.
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
A Note on Translations
Introduction
Chapter 1: Foundationalism, Coherentism, and the Normativity of Rationality
Chapter 2: Jaspers on Irrationality
Chapter 3: Whats So Irrational about Delusions? Part I
Chapter 4: Whats So Irrational about Delusions? Part II
Chapter 5: Irrational Worldviews: On Psychoanalysis, Marxism, and
Catholicity
Chapter 6: Reflections and Considerations
Bibliography
Index
About the Author
Daniel Adsett is assistant professor teaching business ethics and philosophy at the American University in Bulgaria.
