Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Organizing for Policy Influence: Comparing Parties, Interest Groups, and Direct Action [Taylor & Francis e-raamat]

  • Formaat: 260 pages, 23 Tables, black and white; 13 Line drawings, black and white; 13 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sari: Environmental Politics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Jul-2019
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9781315192215
  • Taylor & Francis e-raamat
  • Hind: 189,26 €*
  • * hind, mis tagab piiramatu üheaegsete kasutajate arvuga ligipääsu piiramatuks ajaks
  • Tavahind: 270,37 €
  • Säästad 30%
  • Formaat: 260 pages, 23 Tables, black and white; 13 Line drawings, black and white; 13 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sari: Environmental Politics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 12-Jul-2019
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-13: 9781315192215

In this book, Benjamin Farrer explains how activists can influence the policies they care about, even when they are outnumbered and their issues are ignored. The solution lies in a surprising place: organizational choice. Different types of organizations will be more influential under particular democratic institutions. If they choose the optimal type of organization - given their institutional context - then even minority groups can be influential. Environmentalists are a key example of how small groups can sometimes punch above their weight. Environmentalists in different countries have made different organizational choices. These choices explain whether or not they succeeded in influencing policy. In the empirical chapters that follow, Farrer shows that environmentalists can sometimes be more influential if they form interest groups, but under other institutions, political parties are the optimal organizational choice. Although interest groups are often easier to create, national institutions can sometimes insulate mainstream politicians from niche interest groups. When institutions deny access to interest groups, activists are forced to send the stronger signal of party entry.

Using a variety of methods, including a formal model, an experiment, and a wealth of empirical data from a variety of settings, Farrer proves that this theory of organizational choice adds to our understanding of several crucial phenomena. First, it helps explain patterns of political participation, by showing the importance of instrumental, rather than purely expressive, motivations for activism. Second, it provides an important modification to Duverger’s (1954) law, by showing that new party entry is a function not only of electoral rules but also of the rules that govern interest groups. Third, it extends research on the role of institutions in determining policy outputs, by showing that policy outcomes are a function of the interaction between organizational choices and institutional context.

List of Figures
ix
List of Tables
x
Acknowledgments xi
1 Introduction
1(23)
Activists and Organizational Choice
5(4)
Party Systems and Organizational Choice
9(2)
Policy Outcomes and Organizational Choice
11(2)
Wider Implications
13(2)
Methodology and Environmentalism
15(2)
Conclusion: Moving Forward
17(7)
2 The Possibilities of Political Organizations
24(53)
What Are Political Organizations? The Choice between Replacing, Pressuring, or Bypassing Policy-Makers
25(17)
Niche versus Mainstream Organizations
42(8)
A First Implication: Mainstream Parties Tend to Ignore Niche Issues
50(3)
A Second Implication: The Transaction between Niche Organizations and Mainstream Parties
53(7)
Conclusion: The Premises and Logic of the Argument
60(17)
3 The Effect of Institutions on Organizational Choice
77(52)
Institutions in Comparative Politics
79(2)
Defining Electoral Rules, Corporatism, and Decentralization
81(3)
What Are Response Costs and Access Costs, and How Do Institutions Affect Them?
84(12)
Effects of Electoral Rules, Corporatism, and Decentralization
96(13)
A Formal Signaling Model
109(20)
4 Translating Formal Theory into Empirical Hypotheses
129(10)
Stating the Hypotheses
131(3)
Environmentalism and Research Design
134(5)
5 Explaining Emergence
139(30)
First Test: Are Different Organizational Choices Positively or Negatively Correlated?
140(7)
Second Test: Does New Party Entry Increase When Corporatism and Resources Are High?
147(9)
Third Test: Does Party System Size Increase When Corporatism and Resources Are High?
156(5)
Conclusion
161(8)
6 Explaining Choices
169(13)
7 Explaining Policy
182(21)
Defining Policy Outcomes
182(2)
Institutions and Coalitions
184(2)
Empirical Tests
186(17)
8 Explaining Motivations
203(21)
Previous Work on Pro-Environmental Behavior and Political Participation
205(5)
Survey Experiment
210(8)
Conclusion
218(6)
9 Conclusion
224(11)
Potential Next Steps
227(3)
Environmentalists and Other Under-Represented Groups
230(5)
10 Appendices
235(1)
Appendix A
Chapter 3
235(9)
Appendix B
Chapter 6
244(2)
Index 246
Benjamin Farrer is an assistant professor in the Environmental Studies Department at Knox College. His main research and teaching interests are in the field of parties and interest groups.