Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment [Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud]

(Research Associate, Centre for International Courts and Tribunals, University College London)
  • Formaat: 202 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 09-Dec-2010
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-13: 9780199603404
  • Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud
  • Raamatu hind pole hetkel teada
  • Formaat: 202 pages
  • Ilmumisaeg: 09-Dec-2010
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-13: 9780199603404
Why should a Spanish court take jurisdiction over an American lawyer accused of facilitating torture on Guantanamo Bay? What empowers a London magistrate to sign an arrest warrant for a former Chilean President? Can it be legitimate or morally defensible for an Israeli court to try a former Nazi whose crimes occurred outside Israel and indeed prior to the establishment of Israel?

This book provides the first full account, explanation, and critique of extraterritorial punishment in international law. Extraterritoriality is deeply entrenched in the practice of legal punishment in domestic legal systems and, in certain circumstances, an established principle of public international law. Often, States claim the right to punish certain offences provided for under their own domestic laws even when they are committed outside their territorial boundaries. Furthermore, extraterritoriality is one of the most remarkable features of international criminal law. Many individuals have been prosecuted in different parts of the world for crimes against humanity, war crimes, genocide, etc. before tribunals which are often located outside the territorial boundaries of the state in which the offences were perpetrated. Finally, the issue of extraterritorial punishment is of pressing importance because of the emergence of new forms of globalized crime, such as transnational terrorism, drug-trafficking, trafficking of human beings, and so on.

This book provides a convincing normative account of extraterritorial punishment. In doing so, it will steer current debates on international criminal justice and the philosophy of punishment in new directions, and link these debates to globalization, the emergence of transnational crime, terrorism, war, and the problem of impunity and mass atrocity.
Table of Cases
xi
List of Abbreviations
xiii
Introduction 1(7)
1 The Morality of Extraterritorial Punishment
1(5)
2 A Brief Overview
6(2)
1 Rights, Individuals, and States
8(22)
1 A Rights-Based Account
8(2)
2 An Account of Moral Rights
10(9)
2.1 The conceptual analysis of rights
11(2)
2.2 The interest-will theories debate: identifying the right-holder
13(2)
2.3 Assigning moral rights: identifying the relevant interest
15(4)
2.4 Who can have rights: individual interests and the state
19(1)
3 The Normative Challenges of an Account of Extraterritorial Punishment
19(11)
2 An Interest-Based Justification for the Right to Punish
30(25)
1 The Right to Punish
30(3)
2 A Normative Justification for the Right to Punish
33(20)
2.1 The justification for the state's power to punish
33(16)
2.2 The justification for the liberty to punish an offender
49(4)
3 Conclusion
53(2)
3 Extraterritorial Jurisdiction over Municipal Crimes
55(32)
1 The Existing Legal Framework
55(1)
2 The Territorial Scope of the Power to Punish
56(3)
3 The Nationality Principle
59(8)
4 The Passive Personality Principle
67(3)
5 The Protective Principle
70(5)
6 Two Possible Objections
75(10)
7 Conclusion
85(2)
4 A Jurisdictional Theory of International Crimes
87(27)
1 Stating the Problem
87(3)
2 Piracy-Based Explanations and the History of International Crimes
90(3)
3 International Offences as `Crimes against Humanity'
93(7)
4 A `Jurisdictional' Theory of International Crimes
100(4)
5 War Crimes and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
104(6)
6 Do We Need a Theory of International Crimes?
110(4)
5 Extraterritorial Jurisdiction for International Crimes
114(26)
1 Universal Criminal Jurisdiction
114(1)
2 The Case for States Holding Universal Criminal Jurisdiction
115(13)
2.1 An argument for individual states having universal jurisdiction over international crimes
117(5)
2.2 Competing arguments for universal jurisdiction
122(6)
3 The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court
128(6)
4 Objections to Universal Jurisdiction
134(6)
4.1 Universal jurisdiction criminalizes political decision-making
134(1)
4.2 Universal jurisdiction risks becoming a tool against political adversaries
135(1)
4.3 Universal jurisdiction is just an expensive taste for elites
136(4)
6 Legitimate Authority and Extraterritorial Punishment
140(33)
1 The Argument for Authority and the Power to Punish
140(2)
2 The Service Conception of Authority
142(4)
3 The Service Conception and the Legitimate Authority of Criminal Courts
146(7)
4 Authority as `Moral Standing'
153(3)
5 Show Trials, `Clean Hands', and the Problem of Victor's Justice
156(7)
6 Trials in absentia and of Defendants Abducted Abroad
163(9)
7 Conclusion
172(1)
Bibliography 173(12)
Index 185
Alejandro Chehtman holds a BA from the University of Buenos Aires and an MSc in Political Theory from the LSE. In 2009, he was awarded his PhD in Law from the LSE for his thesis 'The Morality of Extraterritorial Punishment'. He joined the Faculty of Law at UCL in September 2008 as Research Associate for the Centre for International Courts and Tribunals. At UCL he works on the DOMAC Project, on the impact of international criminal tribunals on domestic prosecutions in mass atrocity cases. He has published articles in Law and Philosophy and the New Criminal Law Review. Alejandro has worked as a legal clerk at the Criminal Appeals Chamber for Justice Martin Irurzun, and at the Public Defender Office in Argentina. He entered the Bar in Buenos Aires in 2006 and he is a member of the Research Panel at Matrix Chambers, London, since 2007.