This book offers an original philosophical perspective on exemplarity. Inspired by Wittgensteins later work and Derridas theory of deconstruction, it argues that examples are not static entities but rather oscillate between singular and universal moments.
There is a broad consensus that exemplary cases mediate between singular instances and universal concepts or norms. In the first part of the book, Mácha contends that there is a kind of différance between singular examples and general exemplars or paradigms. Every example is, in part, also an exemplar, and vice versa. Furthermore, he develops a paracomplete approach to the logic of exemplarity, which allows us to say of an exemplar of X neither that it is an X nor that it is not an X. This paradox is structurally isomorphic to Russells paradox and can be addressed in similar ways. In the second part of the book, Mácha presents four historical studies that exemplify the ideas developed in the first part. This part begins with Platos Forms, understood as standards/paradigms, before considering Kants theory of reflective judgment as a general epistemological account of exemplarity. This is then followed by analyses of Hegels conceptual moment of particularity and Kuhns concept of paradigm. The book concludes by discussing the speculative hypothesis that all our knowledge is based on paradigms, which, following the logic of exemplarity, are neither true nor false.
The Philosophy of Exemplarity will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in philosophy of language, logic, history of philosophy, and literary theory.
Rohkem infot Taylor & Francis e-raamatute kohta