Foreword |
|
xi | |
Preface |
|
xiii | |
Authors |
|
xv | |
|
|
1 | (16) |
|
1.1 Servo, regulation, and stability |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Industrial PID control |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.3 Internal model and H∞ control |
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
1.3.1 Internal model control |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.3.3 Blending internal model and H∞ control |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.3.4 Vilanova's (2008) design for robust PID tuning revisited |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (9) |
|
I MODEL-MATCHING APPROACH TO ROBUST PID DESIGN |
|
|
17 | (54) |
|
2 Simple Model-Matching Approach to Robust PID Control |
|
|
19 | (20) |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
2.1.1 The control framework |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 The model-matching problem |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
2.1.3 The model-matching problem within Hoc control |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (4) |
|
2.2.1 Initial formulation for set-point response |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Alternative formulation |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.4 Automatic PID tuning derivation |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
2.4.1 Control effort constraints |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (6) |
|
3 Alternative Design for Load Disturbance Improvement |
|
|
39 | (18) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
3.1.1 The control framework |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 The model-matching problem formulation |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
3.2 Model-matching solution for PID design |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3.3 Trade-off tuning interval considering load disturbances |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
|
49 | (8) |
|
4 Analysis of the Smooth/Tight-Servo/Regulation Tuning Approaches |
|
|
57 | (14) |
|
4.1 Revisiting the model-matching designs |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
4.3 Servo/regulation tuning |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
4.4 Implementation aspects |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
II WEIGHT SELECTION FOR SENSITIVITY SHAPING |
|
|
71 | (34) |
|
5 H∞ Design with Application to PI Tuning |
|
|
73 | (16) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
5.4 Stability and robustness analysis |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
5.5 Application to PI tuning |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
5.5.1 Stable/unstable plants |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Integrating plant case (τ → ∞) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (7) |
|
6 Generalized IMC Design and H2 Approach |
|
|
89 | (16) |
|
6.1 Motivation for the input/output disturbance trade-off |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
6.4.1 Interpretation in terms of alternative IMC filters |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Extension to plants with integrators or complex poles |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
6.5 Performance and robustness analysis |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (7) |
|
III WEIGHTED SENSITIVITY APPROACH FOR ROBUST PID TUNING |
|
|
105 | (22) |
|
7 PID Design as a Weighted Sensitivity Problem |
|
|
107 | (8) |
|
7.1 Context, motivation, and objective |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
7.2 Servo/regulation and robustness/performance trade-offs |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
7.3 Unifying tuning rules |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
7.4 Special cases and tuning-rule simplifications |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
7.4.1 First-order cases (τ2 = 0) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
7.5 Applicability: normalized dead time range |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
8 PID Tuning Guidelines for Balanced Operation |
|
|
115 | (12) |
|
8.1 Robustness and comparable servo/regulation designs |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
8.2 Servo/regulation performance evaluation: Jmax and Javg indices |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
8.3 PI control using first-order models |
|
|
118 | (5) |
|
8.3.1 Stable and integrating cases |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
8.3.1.1 Tuning based on Jmax |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
8.3.1.2 Tuning based on Javg |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
8.3.2.1 Tuning based on Jmax and Javg |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
8.4 PID control using second-order models |
|
|
123 | (4) |
|
8.4.1 Stable and integrating cases |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
8.4.1.1 Tuning based on Jmax |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
8.4.1.2 Tuning based on Javg |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
8.4.2.1 Tuning based on Jmax and Javg |
|
|
125 | (2) |
Appendix A |
|
127 | (4) |
Bibliography |
|
131 | (6) |
Index |
|
137 | |