Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Point Cloud Data Fusion for Enhancing 2D Urban Flood Modelling [Taylor & Francis e-raamat]

(UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands)
  • Taylor & Francis e-raamat
  • Hind: 281,59 €*
  • * hind, mis tagab piiramatu üheaegsete kasutajate arvuga ligipääsu piiramatuks ajaks
  • Tavahind: 402,26 €
  • Säästad 30%

Modelling urban flood dynamics requires proper handling of a number of complex urban features. Although high-resolution topographic data can nowadays be obtained from aerial LiDAR surveys, such top-view LiDAR data still have difficulties to represent some key components of urban features. Incorrectly representing features like underpasses through buildings or apparent blockage of flow by sky trains may lead to misrepresentation of actual flood propagation, which could easily result in inadequate flood-protection measures. Hence proper handling of urban features plays an important role in enhancing urban flood modelling.

This research explores present-day capabilities of using computer-based environments to merge side-view Structure-from-Motion data acquisition with top-view LiDAR data to create a novel multi-source views (MSV) topographic representation for enhancing 2D model schematizations. A new MSV topographic data environment was explored for the city of Delft and compared with the conventional top-view LiDAR approach. Based on the experience gained, the effects of different topographic descriptions were explored for 2D urban flood models of (i) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia for the 2003 flood event; and (ii) Ayutthaya, Thailand for the 2011 flood event.

It was observed that adopting the new MSV data as the basis for describing the urban topography, the numerical simulations provide a more realistic representation of complex urban flood dynamics, thus enhancing conventional approaches and revealing specific features like flood watermarks identification and helping to develop improved flood-protection measures.

Summary vii
Samenvatting ix
Acknowledgements xi
Chapter 1 Introduction 1(12)
1.1 Urban flooding
2(4)
1.2 Topographic input data for urban flood modelling
6(2)
1.3 Objectives and research questions
8(2)
1.4 Dissertation outline
10(3)
Chapter 2 State of the art in urban flood modelling 13(50)
2.1 Approaches to urban flood modelling
14(2)
2.2 1D flood modelling
16(11)
2.2.1 Cross sections of river floodplains
16(1)
2.2.2 Cross sections of urban floodplains
17(2)
2.2.3 1D schematics of 1D models
19(2)
2.2.4 Bed resistance conditions for cross sections
21(1)
2.2.5 1D De Saint-Venant flow equations
22(2)
2.2.6 Boundary conditions for 1D models
24(1)
2.2.7 Initial conditions for 1D models
25(1)
2.2.8 Sample 1D simulated results
25(2)
2.3 Quasi 2D approaches from 1D models
27(4)
2.3.1 Quasi 2D approaches to river floodplains
27(1)
2.3.2 Quasi 2D approaches to urban floodplains
28(3)
2.4 2D flood modelling
31(9)
2.4.1 2D schematics of 2D models
32(3)
2.4.2 Bed resistance conditions for 2D models
35(1)
2.4.3 The 2D De Saint-Venant flow equations
35(2)
2.4.4 Boundary conditions for 2D models
37(1)
2.4.5 Initial conditions for 2D models
37(2)
2.4.6 Sample 2D simulated results
39(1)
2.5 Coupled 1D-2D modelling
40(4)
2.6 Comparisons of simulated results
44(8)
2.6.1 Calibration and validation basis
44(2)
2.6.2 Comparisons of simulated results for 1D hypothetical case
46(3)
2.6.3 Comparisons of simulated results for 1D versus 2D hypothetical cases
49(2)
2.6.4 Comparisons of simulated results for 2D versus coupled 1D-2D Hypothetical cases
51(1)
2.7 Issues concerning complex-urban flood modelling
52(11)
2.7.1 Complex topography
52(2)
2.7.2 Submerge drainage systems
54(6)
2.7.3 Control structures for 1D models
60(3)
Chapter 3 Conventional top-view LiDAR topographic data 63(32)
3.1 Evolution in topographic data acquisition
64(3)
3.2 Top-view LiDAR data acquisition
67(7)
3.2.1 Aerial based surveying for the top-view LiDAR data acquisition
68(4)
3.2.2 Aerial based surveying related to the ground
72(2)
3.3 Raw LiDAR data processing and registration
74(2)
3.4 Top-view LiDAR data simplification
76(16)
3.4.1 Top-view LiDAR point cloud extraction
77(5)
3.4.2 Top-view LiDAR rasterization
82(10)
3.5 Issues concerning top-view LiDAR data
92(3)
Chapter 4 Introducing new side-view SfM topographic data 95(36)
4.1 Land surveying approaches
96(4)
4.2 Side-view SfM data acquisition
100(4)
4.3 Raw SfM data processing and registration
104(8)
4.3.1 Image pre-processing
104(2)
4.3.2 Feature detection and matching
106(2)
4.3.3 SfM point cloud reconstruction and point cloud density enhancement
108(2)
4.3.4 SfM point cloud registration adjustment
110(2)
4.4 Side-view SfM data simplification
112(15)
4.4.1 Facade and low-level structure point cloud extractions
113(6)
4.4.2 Determination of openings around structures
119(6)
4.4.3 Side-view Sp mapping and rasterization
125(2)
4.5 Issue concerning the side-view SfM data
127(4)
Chapter 5 A novel approach for merging multi-views topographic data 131(26)
5.1 Multi-view enhancements
132(7)
5.1.1 Top-view LiDAR data
132(3)
5.1.2 Side-view SfM data
135(1)
5.1.3 Multi-views data
136(3)
5.2 Effect of grid size
139(11)
5.2.1 Different stages of 2D dynamic flow modelling
146(1)
5.2.2 Equivalent roughness
147(1)
5.2.3 Urban inundation mapping
148(2)
5.3 Considerations for raster-based topographic data
150(2)
5.4 Selection of case study areas
152(5)
5.4.1 Criteria for selection of case study areas
152(1)
5.4.2 Case study area descriptions
152(5)
Chapter 6 Applying multi-source views DEM to the case study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 157(24)
6.1 The case study
158(2)
6.1.1 Description of the case study
158(1)
6.1.2 Climate and rainfall patterns
159(1)
6.2 Topographic data acquisition and rasterization
160(7)
6.2.1 7Top-view LiDAR digital surface model (LiDAR-DSM)
161(1)
6.2.2 Top-view filtered LIDAR digital terrain model (LiDAR-DTM)
161(2)
6.2.3 Side-view SIM surveying.
163(2)
6.2.4 Multi-source views of digital elevation model (MSV-DEM)
165(2)
6.3 Numerical modelling schemes
167(3)
6.4 Results
170(7)
6.4.1 Simulated results using the LiDAR-DSM
174(1)
6.4.2 Simulated results using the LIDAR-DTM
174(1)
6.4.3 Simulated results using the new MSV-DEM
175(2)
6.5 Discussion
177(2)
6.6 Conclusions
179(2)
Chapter 7 Extracting inundation patterns from flood watermarks: the case study of Ayutthaya, Thailand 181(38)
7.1 The case study
182(4)
7.1.1 Description of the case study
182(1)
7.1.2 Climate and rainfall patterns
183(1)
7.1.3 Severe flooding event in 2011
184(2)
7.2 Top-view LiDAR data acquisition and processing
186(2)
7.2.1 Aerial surveying
186(1)
7.2.2 Top-view LiDAR data processing
187(1)
7.3 Side-view data acquisition and processing
188(5)
7.3.1 Side-view surveying
188(2)
7.3.2 Side-view SIM data processing
190(3)
7.4 Flood watermark extraction
193(7)
7.4.1 Land surveying
194(1)
7.4.2 Extracting flood watermarksfrom side-mew SJM data
195(3)
7.4.3 Comparison of flood watermark observations
198(2)
7.5 Creating multi-source views digital elevation model (MSV-DEM)
200(2)
7.6 Numerical modelling setups
202(2)
7.7 Results
204(9)
7.7.1 Calibration of the models
204(3)
7.7.2 Comparison of 2D simulated floodwater levels
207(3)
7.7.3 Comparison of 2D simulated inundations
210(3)
7.8 Discussion
213(3)
7.9 Conclusions
216(3)
Chapter 8 Recommendations for developing flood-protection measures: the case study of Ayutthaya, Thailand 219(20)
8.1 Problem identification
220(1)
8.2 Proposed flood-protection measures
221(8)
8.2.1 Regional flood-protection measures
224(1)
8.2.2 Local flood-protection measures
225(4)
8.3 Establishment of scenarios
229(2)
8.4 Evaluation of the simulated measures
231(3)
8.4.1 Existing situation
232(1)
8.4.2 Regional flood-protection measure
232(1)
8.4.3 Local flood-protection measures
232(1)
8.4.4 Combined flood-protection measures
233(1)
8.5 Stakeholder preferences for flood-protection measures
234(3)
8.5.1 Community preferences
235(1)
8.5.2 Stakeholder preferences
236(1)
8.6 Conclusions
237(2)
Chapter 9 Outlook of multi-view surveys and applications 239(22)
9.1 Obtaining topographic data from different views
240(3)
9.2 Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)
243(5)
9.3 Mobile mapping system (MMS)
248(1)
9.4 Unmanned surface vehicle (USV)
249(2)
9.5 Night vision cameras for enhancing side-view surveys
251(2)
9.6 Enhancing 2D model schematics
253(1)
9.7 3Di for enhancing 2D models
254(3)
9.8 High-performance computers for minimising computational costs
257(4)
Chapter 10 Conclusions and recommendations 261(14)
10.1 Limitations of using conventional top-view LiDAR data
262(1)
10.2 Benefits of using SfM technique for creating topographic data
263(1)
10.3 3D point cloud data can be fused for constructing proper elevation maps
264(2)
10.4 3D point cloud data can be used for enhancing 2D flood models
266(3)
10.5 Enhanced computer-based environments can help developing flood-protection measures
269(2)
10.6 Recommendations
271(4)
References 275(18)
About the author 293
Vorawit Meesuk is a PhD candidate in hydroinformatics for urban flood modelling at UNESCO-IHE and TU-Delft, the Netherlands. He holds a background MSc degree in Remote Sensing and GIS technologies (2003) from Khon Kaen University, Thailand. His PhD research focuses on the topic of applying computer vision and photogrammetry techniques to create better topographical data by merging different sources and difference viewpoints to enhance 2D flood simulation for complex urban cities. Besides doing research, he organised the Ayutthaya workshop in a joint effort with ADB, UNESCO-BANGKOK, in 2014. He also guided MSc students and gave GIS and coupled 1D-2D modelling lectures at UNESCO-IHE. Currently, he works at (HAII/MOST) as a Head of Observation and Telemetry Section, whose responsibilities are to provide and maintain telemetry systems for monitoring weather conditions and water-level changes in over 700 stations in Thailand and neighbouring countries.