Summary |
|
vii | |
Samenvatting |
|
ix | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xi | |
Chapter 1 Introduction |
|
1 | (12) |
|
|
2 | (4) |
|
1.2 Topographic input data for urban flood modelling |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
1.3 Objectives and research questions |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
Chapter 2 State of the art in urban flood modelling |
|
13 | (50) |
|
2.1 Approaches to urban flood modelling |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
|
16 | (11) |
|
2.2.1 Cross sections of river floodplains |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Cross sections of urban floodplains |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 1D schematics of 1D models |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.2.4 Bed resistance conditions for cross sections |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 1D De Saint-Venant flow equations |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2.2.6 Boundary conditions for 1D models |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.2.7 Initial conditions for 1D models |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.8 Sample 1D simulated results |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
2.3 Quasi 2D approaches from 1D models |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
2.3.1 Quasi 2D approaches to river floodplains |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Quasi 2D approaches to urban floodplains |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
|
31 | (9) |
|
2.4.1 2D schematics of 2D models |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2.4.2 Bed resistance conditions for 2D models |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 The 2D De Saint-Venant flow equations |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
2.4.4 Boundary conditions for 2D models |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.4.5 Initial conditions for 2D models |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
2.4.6 Sample 2D simulated results |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.5 Coupled 1D-2D modelling |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
2.6 Comparisons of simulated results |
|
|
44 | (8) |
|
2.6.1 Calibration and validation basis |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
2.6.2 Comparisons of simulated results for 1D hypothetical case |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
2.6.3 Comparisons of simulated results for 1D versus 2D hypothetical cases |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.6.4 Comparisons of simulated results for 2D versus coupled 1D-2D Hypothetical cases |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.7 Issues concerning complex-urban flood modelling |
|
|
52 | (11) |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
2.7.2 Submerge drainage systems |
|
|
54 | (6) |
|
2.7.3 Control structures for 1D models |
|
|
60 | (3) |
Chapter 3 Conventional top-view LiDAR topographic data |
|
63 | (32) |
|
3.1 Evolution in topographic data acquisition |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
3.2 Top-view LiDAR data acquisition |
|
|
67 | (7) |
|
3.2.1 Aerial based surveying for the top-view LiDAR data acquisition |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
3.2.2 Aerial based surveying related to the ground |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
3.3 Raw LiDAR data processing and registration |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
3.4 Top-view LiDAR data simplification |
|
|
76 | (16) |
|
3.4.1 Top-view LiDAR point cloud extraction |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
3.4.2 Top-view LiDAR rasterization |
|
|
82 | (10) |
|
3.5 Issues concerning top-view LiDAR data |
|
|
92 | (3) |
Chapter 4 Introducing new side-view SfM topographic data |
|
95 | (36) |
|
4.1 Land surveying approaches |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
4.2 Side-view SfM data acquisition |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
4.3 Raw SfM data processing and registration |
|
|
104 | (8) |
|
4.3.1 Image pre-processing |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
4.3.2 Feature detection and matching |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
4.3.3 SfM point cloud reconstruction and point cloud density enhancement |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
4.3.4 SfM point cloud registration adjustment |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
4.4 Side-view SfM data simplification |
|
|
112 | (15) |
|
4.4.1 Facade and low-level structure point cloud extractions |
|
|
113 | (6) |
|
4.4.2 Determination of openings around structures |
|
|
119 | (6) |
|
4.4.3 Side-view Sp mapping and rasterization |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
4.5 Issue concerning the side-view SfM data |
|
|
127 | (4) |
Chapter 5 A novel approach for merging multi-views topographic data |
|
131 | (26) |
|
5.1 Multi-view enhancements |
|
|
132 | (7) |
|
5.1.1 Top-view LiDAR data |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
|
139 | (11) |
|
5.2.1 Different stages of 2D dynamic flow modelling |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Equivalent roughness |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Urban inundation mapping |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
5.3 Considerations for raster-based topographic data |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
5.4 Selection of case study areas |
|
|
152 | (5) |
|
5.4.1 Criteria for selection of case study areas |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 Case study area descriptions |
|
|
152 | (5) |
Chapter 6 Applying multi-source views DEM to the case study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
|
157 | (24) |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
6.1.1 Description of the case study |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 Climate and rainfall patterns |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
6.2 Topographic data acquisition and rasterization |
|
|
160 | (7) |
|
6.2.1 7Top-view LiDAR digital surface model (LiDAR-DSM) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Top-view filtered LIDAR digital terrain model (LiDAR-DTM) |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
6.2.3 Side-view SIM surveying. |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
6.2.4 Multi-source views of digital elevation model (MSV-DEM) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
6.3 Numerical modelling schemes |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
|
170 | (7) |
|
6.4.1 Simulated results using the LiDAR-DSM |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Simulated results using the LIDAR-DTM |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 Simulated results using the new MSV-DEM |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
Chapter 7 Extracting inundation patterns from flood watermarks: the case study of Ayutthaya, Thailand |
|
181 | (38) |
|
|
182 | (4) |
|
7.1.1 Description of the case study |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
7.1.2 Climate and rainfall patterns |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 Severe flooding event in 2011 |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
7.2 Top-view LiDAR data acquisition and processing |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Top-view LiDAR data processing |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
7.3 Side-view data acquisition and processing |
|
|
188 | (5) |
|
7.3.1 Side-view surveying |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
7.3.2 Side-view SIM data processing |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
7.4 Flood watermark extraction |
|
|
193 | (7) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Extracting flood watermarksfrom side-mew SJM data |
|
|
195 | (3) |
|
7.4.3 Comparison of flood watermark observations |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
7.5 Creating multi-source views digital elevation model (MSV-DEM) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
7.6 Numerical modelling setups |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
|
204 | (9) |
|
7.7.1 Calibration of the models |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
7.7.2 Comparison of 2D simulated floodwater levels |
|
|
207 | (3) |
|
7.7.3 Comparison of 2D simulated inundations |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
|
213 | (3) |
|
|
216 | (3) |
Chapter 8 Recommendations for developing flood-protection measures: the case study of Ayutthaya, Thailand |
|
219 | (20) |
|
8.1 Problem identification |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
8.2 Proposed flood-protection measures |
|
|
221 | (8) |
|
8.2.1 Regional flood-protection measures |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 Local flood-protection measures |
|
|
225 | (4) |
|
8.3 Establishment of scenarios |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
8.4 Evaluation of the simulated measures |
|
|
231 | (3) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 Regional flood-protection measure |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Local flood-protection measures |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
8.4.4 Combined flood-protection measures |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
8.5 Stakeholder preferences for flood-protection measures |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
8.5.1 Community preferences |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
8.5.2 Stakeholder preferences |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (2) |
Chapter 9 Outlook of multi-view surveys and applications |
|
239 | (22) |
|
9.1 Obtaining topographic data from different views |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
9.2 Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) |
|
|
243 | (5) |
|
9.3 Mobile mapping system (MMS) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
9.4 Unmanned surface vehicle (USV) |
|
|
249 | (2) |
|
9.5 Night vision cameras for enhancing side-view surveys |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
9.6 Enhancing 2D model schematics |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
9.7 3Di for enhancing 2D models |
|
|
254 | (3) |
|
9.8 High-performance computers for minimising computational costs |
|
|
257 | (4) |
Chapter 10 Conclusions and recommendations |
|
261 | (14) |
|
10.1 Limitations of using conventional top-view LiDAR data |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
10.2 Benefits of using SfM technique for creating topographic data |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
10.3 3D point cloud data can be fused for constructing proper elevation maps |
|
|
264 | (2) |
|
10.4 3D point cloud data can be used for enhancing 2D flood models |
|
|
266 | (3) |
|
10.5 Enhanced computer-based environments can help developing flood-protection measures |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
|
271 | (4) |
References |
|
275 | (18) |
About the author |
|
293 | |