Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Category Mistakes [Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud]

(Balliol College, Oxford)
  • Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud
  • Raamatu hind pole hetkel teada
Category mistakes are sentences such as 'Green ideas sleep furiously', 'Saturday is in bed', and The theory of relactivity is eating breakfast. Such sentences strike most speakers as highly infelicitous but it is a challenge to explain precisely why they are so. Ofra Magidor addresses this challenge, while providing a comprehensive discussion of the various treatments of category mistakes in both philosophy and linguistics.

The phenomenon of category mistakes is particularly interesting because a plausible case can be made for explaining it in terms of each of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics--making it a fruitful case for exploring the relations between, and nature of, these three fundamental realms of language. Category Mistakes follows this division, discussing four types of accounts: the syntactic approach to the phenomenon, two distinct semantic approaches, and the pragmatic approach. Magidor argues that the first three ought to be rejected, and addresses the challenge by developing and defending a novel version of the pragmatic approach: the presuppositional account of category mistakes.

Ofra Magidor is CUF Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Oxford, and Fairfax Tutor and Fellow in Philosophy at Balliol College. She is also a member of the Faculty of Linguistics, Philology, and Phonetics at the University of Oxford. Her research focuses on Philosophy of Logic and Language and related issues in Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Philosophy of Mathematics. Previously, she was Junior Research Fellow at Queens college, Oxford. She holds a BPhil and DPhil in Philosophy from the University of Oxford, and a BSc in Philosophy, Mathematics, and Computer Science from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Acknowledgements ix
1 Introduction
1(24)
§ 1 The Phenomenon of Category Mistakes
1(6)
§ 2 Category Mistakes in the Philosophical Literature
7(8)
§ 3 Category Mistakes in the Linguistics Literature
15(5)
§ 4 Category Mistakes in Computer Science
20(3)
§ 5 Conclusion
23(2)
2 The Syntactic Approach
25(18)
§ 1 The Syntactic Approach to Category Mistakes
25(5)
§ 2 Some Unsatisfactory Arguments Against the Syntactic Approach
30(1)
§ 2.1 The simplicity argument
30(2)
§ 2.2 The meaningfulness argument
32(1)
§ 2.3 The argument from universality
32(3)
§ 3 The Argument from Particularity
35(3)
§ 4 The Argument from Embedding
38(1)
§ 5 Interactions with Meanings
39(1)
§ 6 Interactions with Extra-Linguistic Facts
40(2)
§ 7 Interactions with Context
42(1)
3 The Meaninglessness View
43(37)
§ 1 The Meaninglessness View of Category Mistakes
43(3)
§ 2 The Argument(s) from Compositionality
46(12)
§ 2.1 Atomic category mistakes
46(2)
§ 2.2 Type-theoretic semantics to the rescue?
48(8)
§ 2.3 Conjunctions and quantifier phrases
56(2)
§ 3 The Argument from Synonymy
58(1)
§ 4 The Argument from Propositional Attitude Ascriptions
59(7)
§ 5 The Argument from Metaphor
66(8)
§ 6 Arguments in Favour of the Meaninglessness View?
74(6)
§ 6.1 The imagination motivation
75(1)
§ 6.2 The motivation from alternative theories of meaning
76(3)
§ 6.3 The nonsense motivation
79(1)
4 The MBT View
80(30)
§ 1 The MBT View
80(3)
§ 2 A General Argument Against the MBT View
83(8)
§ 3 Arguments in Favour of the MBT View
91(8)
§ 3.1 The infelicity argument
91(3)
§ 3.2 Routley's transfer argument
94(1)
§ 3.3 The arbitrariness argument
95(4)
§ 4 The Supervaluationist Treatment of Category Mistakes
99(11)
§ 4.1 The formal details
99(2)
§ 4.2 Validity and implication
101(5)
§ 4.3 The problem of complex category mistakes
106(4)
5 The Pragmatic Approach
110(49)
§ 1 The Pragmatic Approach
110(1)
§ 2 The Naive Pragmatic Approach
111(5)
§ 3 The Background Framework: Pragmatic Presuppositions
116(15)
§ 3.1 Tests for presupposition
117(7)
§ 3.2 Foundational issues
124(7)
§ 4 A Presuppositional Account of Category Mistakes
131(17)
§ 4.1 A basic example
131(9)
§ 4.2 Other cases
140(6)
§ 4.3 Characterizing category mistakes?
146(2)
§ 5 Merits of the Account
148(6)
§ 6 Postscript: Some Final Reflections on the Implications of the Account
154(5)
References 159(8)
Index 167
Ofra Magidor studied philosophy, mathematics, and computer science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and completed a BPhil (2004) and DPhil (2007) in philosophy at the University of Oxford. Between 2005 and 2007 she was a Junior Research Fellow at Queen's College, Oxford, and since 2007 she has held a tutorial fellowship and CUF lectureship in philosophy at Balliol College and the University of Oxford. Her research focuses on philosophy of logic and language, as well as related issues in metaphysics, epistemology, and philosophy of mathematics.