| Foreword |
|
xv | |
| Preface |
|
xvii | |
|
|
|
xxiii | |
|
PART I FUNDAMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS |
|
|
1 | (130) |
|
|
|
3 | (32) |
|
|
|
What Is Chemical Sensing? |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
|
6 | (9) |
|
|
|
6 | (4) |
|
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Other Indirect Methods (Switch of Molecules) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
Sensitivity and the Problem of False Positives |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
Configuring an Electronic Trace Sensor |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
Integration and Packaging |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
|
18 | (17) |
|
|
|
18 | (5) |
|
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Catch, Count, and Release Cycle |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Sensor Sensitivity Versus Sampling Time |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
|
27 | (5) |
|
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
|
|
35 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
|
43 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Theory of Improvised Explosives |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
History and the Anarchist Literature |
|
|
45 | (6) |
|
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
|
55 | (8) |
|
|
|
63 | (6) |
|
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
Where Should We Look for Explosive Molecules? |
|
|
69 | (40) |
|
|
|
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
Where Did the Molecules Come from and How Did They Get Here? |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Objects Other Than Buried Landmines |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Questions That Beg for Answers |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
|
71 | (5) |
|
How the Molecules Diffuse or Leak from a Munition |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
Transport of the Molecules |
|
|
76 | (23) |
|
|
|
77 | (17) |
|
Concentration Estimates from Buried Sources |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
EF&T Implications for Search and Sampling Strategies |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
Open Questions and Fruitful Areas for Future Research |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Objects Buried in the Sea Bottom |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Role of Computer Modeling |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
|
104 | (5) |
|
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
Structure of Turbulent Chemical Plumes |
|
|
109 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
Time-Averaged Characteristics |
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
Information for Tracking Chemical Odor Plumes |
|
|
118 | (7) |
|
Variation of the Plume Structure |
|
|
125 | (6) |
|
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
|
|
131 | (62) |
|
Detection of Trace Explosive Signatures in the Marine Environment |
|
|
133 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Overview of Fate and Transport of Explosives Released from UUXO |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Sampling and Sensing Methodology |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
SeaDog Sensor Configurations |
|
|
137 | (6) |
|
Prototype Integrated with a Robotic Crawler Platform |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Diver-Deployed SeaDog and Initial Integration with the REMUS |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
SeaDog Miniaturization: The SeaPup |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Results of Sensor Tests Conducted in the Marine Environment |
|
|
143 | (5) |
|
Tests of the Sensor Prototype on a Crawler Vehicle |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
Tests of the Diver-Deployed SeaDog Sensor and Initial Integration to the REMUS |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Tests of the SeaPup Sensor Integrated on the REMUS |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
Explosives Detection Using Ultrasensitive Electronic Vapor Sensors: Field Experience |
|
|
151 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
Relevance of Field Testing To Sensor Development |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Overview of the Vapor Signatures of Explosives |
|
|
154 | (4) |
|
|
|
158 | (12) |
|
Introduction to the Mine Problem |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Discussion of Landmine Chemical Vapor Signatures |
|
|
159 | (5) |
|
Landmine Detection Field Test Results |
|
|
164 | (6) |
|
Comparison of Fido with Canines Using High-Volume Sampling Methods (REST) |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
|
|
172 | (5) |
|
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
|
172 | (5) |
|
Reflections on Hunting Mines by Aroma Sensing |
|
|
177 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
|
177 | (16) |
|
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
PART III EXAMPLE SENSING TECHNOLOGIES |
|
|
193 | (118) |
|
Explosives Detection Based on Amplifying Fluorescence Polymers |
|
|
195 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
195 | (6) |
|
AFP Principle of Operation |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
|
197 | (4) |
|
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
|
203 | (5) |
|
Maturity of the Fido Technology |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
Ion Mobility Spectrometry |
|
|
211 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Brief Description of Principle of Operation |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
Mass Spectrometry for Security Screening of Explosives |
|
|
219 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
|
220 | (3) |
|
Explosives Trace Detection |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
Quantitative vs. Screening Analysis |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
|
223 | (8) |
|
|
|
223 | (3) |
|
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
Mass Spectrometry Versus Ion Mobility Spectrometry |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
Other MS Analyzers Used for Explosives Detection |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
|
231 | (3) |
|
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
Detection Accuracy---A Model |
|
|
234 | (6) |
|
|
|
234 | (2) |
|
Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
|
236 | (4) |
|
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
|
|
242 | (3) |
|
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
Explosive Vapor Detection Using Microcantilever Sensors |
|
|
245 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
Modes of Operation and Theory |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
Thermal Motions of a Cantilever |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
Thermal Effects---Deflagration |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
|
250 | (4) |
|
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
Lab-On-A-Chip Detection of Explosives |
|
|
261 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 | (4) |
|
Lab-on-a-Chip Explosives Detection by Electrochemical Detection |
|
|
265 | (6) |
|
Amperometry for Explosives Detection |
|
|
266 | (2) |
|
Contactless Conductivity Detection |
|
|
268 | (2) |
|
Dual Amperometric/Conductivity Detection for Simultaneous Monitoring of Ionic and Organic Explosives |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
Lab-on-a-Chip Explosives Detection Utilizing Optical Methods |
|
|
271 | (6) |
|
Lab-on-a-chip Sampling of Explosives |
|
|
277 | (4) |
|
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
Nanoscale Sensing Assemblies Using Quantum Dot-Protein Bioconjugates |
|
|
285 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Quantum Dot--Protein Bioconjugates |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Forster Formalism and Quantum Dots as Energy Donors |
|
|
287 | (3) |
|
Quantum Dots as FRET Donors |
|
|
290 | (4) |
|
Quantum-Dot-Based FRET Nanosensors |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
Surface-Attached QD--FRET Nanoassemblies |
|
|
296 | (4) |
|
|
|
300 | (3) |
|
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
|
|
300 | (3) |
|
Remote Sensing of Explosive Materials Using Differential Reflection Spectroscopy |
|
|
303 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
Differential Reflectometry |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
|
|
305 | (4) |
|
|
|
309 | (2) |
|
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
PART IV SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL |
|
|
311 | (2) |
|
APPENDIX: ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN SEARCHING FOR HIDDEN EXPLOSIVES |
|
|
313 | (12) |
|
|
|
International and Nongovernmental Organizations |
|
|
313 | (2) |
|
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
|
|
319 | (2) |
|
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
Information/Data Bases and Links |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
|
|
323 | (2) |
|
DEFINITIONS, SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS |
|
|
325 | (6) |
|
|
|
325 | (5) |
|
Symbols and Abbreviations |
|
|
330 | (1) |
| Explosives Definitions |
|
331 | (2) |
| Bibliography |
|
333 | (18) |
| Index |
|
351 | |