Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Current State of Domain Name Regulation: Domain Names as Second Class Citizens in a Mark-Dominated World [Taylor & Francis e-raamat]

(University of Strathclyde, UK)
  • Taylor & Francis e-raamat
  • Hind: 180,03 €*
  • * hind, mis tagab piiramatu üheaegsete kasutajate arvuga ligipääsu piiramatuks ajaks
  • Tavahind: 257,19 €
  • Säästad 30%

In this book Konstantinos Komaitis identifies a tripartite problem – intellectual, institutional and ethical – inherent in the domain name regulation culture. Using the theory of property, Komaitis discusses domain names as sui generis ‘e-property’ rights and analyses the experience of the past ten years, through the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). The institutional deficit he identifies, generates a further discussion on the ethical dimensions in the regulation of domain names and prompts Komaitis to suggest the creation of an environment based on justice.

The relationship between trademarks and domain names has always been contentious and the existing institutions of the UDRP and ACPA have not assisted in alleviating the tension between the two identifiers. Over the past ten years, the trademark community has been systematic in encouraging and promoting a culture that indiscriminately considers domain names as secondclass citizens, suggesting that trademark rights should have priority over the registration in the domain name space.

Komaitis disputes this assertion and brings to light the injustices and the trademark-oriented nature of the UDRP and ACPA. He queries what the appropriate legal source to protect registrants when not seeking to promote trademark interests is. He also delineates a legal hypothesis on their nature as well as the steps of their institutionalisation process that we need to reverse, seeking to create a just framework for the regulation of domain names. Finally he explores how the current policies contribute to the philosophy of domain names as second-class citizens.

With these questions in mind, Komaitis suggests some recommendations concerning the reconfiguration of the regulation of domain names.

Table of legislation xii
Table of cases xiv
Preface xxiv
Selected acronyms xxvii
1 Introduction: taking on the sins of ICANN and the UDRP
1(8)
1.1 Problematising domain name disputes
3(2)
1.2 The research issue
5(1)
1.3 Designing the hypothesis
6(1)
1.4 Goals and plan of the book
7(2)
Part I Intellectual problem 9(62)
2 Contextualising property
11(13)
2.1 The place of property: where property law currently resides
14(5)
2.2 The political mapping of property
19(5)
3 Introducing trademarks
24(15)
3.1 Intellectual property and trademarks
25(2)
3.2 Defending trademarks
27(2)
3.3 The legal philosophy of trademarks
29(2)
3.4 The economic value of trademarks
31(4)
3.5 The political mapping of trademarks
35(4)
4 Domain names: their technological, socio-economic and legal status
39(32)
4.1 The technical nature of domain names: what's in a name?
41(3)
4.2 The socio-economic function of domain names
44(1)
4.3 Socio-economic norms in the domain name market
45(3)
4.4 Domain name legal theories
48(14)
4.5 Domain names as property
62(9)
Part II Institutional problem 71(76)
5 History of domain name institutionalisation
73(12)
5.1 ICANN's authority to create the UDRP
76(3)
5.2 The road to the UDRP
79(3)
5.3 ICANN launches the UDRP
82(3)
6 'Lex domainia': the new lex mercatoria?
85(4)
7 The UDRP and arbitration
89(7)
7.1 Justification of arbitration and the scope of the New York Convention
89(2)
7.2 Arbitration and the UDRP: the face-off
91(5)
8 Issues of procedural unfairness
96(17)
8.1 The UDRP restricts the legal rights of registrants
96(4)
8.2 Issues of inconsistency in a uniform system
100(7)
8.3 Can courts conduct a sufficient review of the UDRP?
107(6)
9 Free speech in the context of the UDRP
113(6)
10 Regulating domain names nationally: the case of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
119(22)
10.1 The U.S. approach prior to the enactment of ACPA
121(4)
10.2 The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
125(2)
10.3 The rationale behind in rem jurisdiction
127(2)
10.4 ACPA and in rem: a dangerous combination
129(7)
10.5 ACPA v. international institutions
136(3)
10.6 The incompatible status of gTLDs and national legislation
139(2)
11 Applying the UDRP and ACPA in the right context
141(6)
Part III Ethical problem 147(20)
12 'Haves' and 'have nots'
149(18)
12.1 Ethical concerns in the context of the UDRP
151(9)
12.2 The domain name Πomicronλιfinalsigma
160(7)
Part IV Themes and issues 167(30)
13 Forwards and backwards...
169(16)
13.1 Reconfiguring the regulation of domain names
172(1)
13.2 Procedural level
173(7)
13.3 Techno-legal level
180(2)
13.4 Political level
182(3)
14 Repeating the same mistakes: new gTLDs and the IRT recommendation report
185(12)
14.1 Injustice at a procedural level
187(2)
14.2 The report's substantive issues
189(6)
14.3 The taming of trademark protection
195(2)
Notes 197(39)
Bibliography 236(21)
Index 257
Konstantinos Komaitis (Ph.D, LLM (Strathclyde University) and LLM (University of Sheffield)) is a lecturer at the University of Strathclyde, UK. He was also a member of ICANN's Special Trademark Issues (STI) team and a drafter of the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) system.