Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Current State of Domain Name Regulation: Domain Names as Second Class Citizens in a Mark-Dominated World

(University of Strathclyde, UK)
  • Formaat - PDF+DRM
  • Hind: 49,39 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • See e-raamat on mõeldud ainult isiklikuks kasutamiseks. E-raamatuid ei saa tagastada.

DRM piirangud

  • Kopeerimine (copy/paste):

    ei ole lubatud

  • Printimine:

    ei ole lubatud

  • Kasutamine:

    Digitaalõiguste kaitse (DRM)
    Kirjastus on väljastanud selle e-raamatu krüpteeritud kujul, mis tähendab, et selle lugemiseks peate installeerima spetsiaalse tarkvara. Samuti peate looma endale  Adobe ID Rohkem infot siin. E-raamatut saab lugeda 1 kasutaja ning alla laadida kuni 6'de seadmesse (kõik autoriseeritud sama Adobe ID-ga).

    Vajalik tarkvara
    Mobiilsetes seadmetes (telefon või tahvelarvuti) lugemiseks peate installeerima selle tasuta rakenduse: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    PC või Mac seadmes lugemiseks peate installima Adobe Digital Editionsi (Seeon tasuta rakendus spetsiaalselt e-raamatute lugemiseks. Seda ei tohi segamini ajada Adober Reader'iga, mis tõenäoliselt on juba teie arvutisse installeeritud )

    Seda e-raamatut ei saa lugeda Amazon Kindle's. 

In this book Konstantinos Komaitis identifies a tripartite problem – intellectual, institutional and ethical – inherent in the domain name regulation culture. Using the theory of property, Komaitis discusses domain names as sui generis ‘e-property’ rights and analyses the experience of the past ten years, through the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA). The institutional deficit he identifies, generates a further discussion on the ethical dimensions in the regulation of domain names and prompts Komaitis to suggest the creation of an environment based on justice.

The relationship between trademarks and domain names has always been contentious and the existing institutions of the UDRP and ACPA have not assisted in alleviating the tension between the two identifiers. Over the past ten years, the trademark community has been systematic in encouraging and promoting a culture that indiscriminately considers domain names as secondclass citizens, suggesting that trademark rights should have priority over the registration in the domain name space.

Komaitis disputes this assertion and brings to light the injustices and the trademark-oriented nature of the UDRP and ACPA. He queries what the appropriate legal source to protect registrants when not seeking to promote trademark interests is. He also delineates a legal hypothesis on their nature as well as the steps of their institutionalisation process that we need to reverse, seeking to create a just framework for the regulation of domain names. Finally he explores how the current policies contribute to the philosophy of domain names as second-class citizens.

With these questions in mind, Komaitis suggests some recommendations concerning the reconfiguration of the regulation of domain names.

Arvustused

'[ This book] provides a passionate yet legalistic and well-researched overview of the legal, institutional and ethical problems caused by the clash between domain names and trademarks. This is really the first decent book-length treatment of what is now a decade and a half of legal and political conflict between domain name registrants and trademark holders. But this is more than a static compilation and description of the subject: Komaitis has an original and fundamentally important argument to make.' - Milton Mueller, Internet Governance Project, 2010

"... the content of the book is excellent and it gives a thorough and comprehensive study on the subject. It is a valuable contribution on the subject of domain names and should be on the top of the list for researchers seeking answers to questions on the state of domain names."Anan Shawqi Younes, University of Leicester; SCRIPTed 2010 (7:3) This book is a must-read for any legal scholar or policy-maker interested in understanding the international public policy objectives and political negotiations behind Internet domain name policy and trademark law policy. If you want to know how the intersection of trademark law and domain name policy has historically evolved, where it is right now, and where it is going, you have found the right book.' Robin D. Gross, Imagine Law, San Francisco, Executive Director of IP Justice, and Chair of ICANNs Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC)

Few academic studies are as timely and compelling as this book. Dr. Komaitis provides the first comprehensive analysis and history of the UDRP. Dr. Komaitis' questions, insights and reformulations stand to alter the way we understand domain names and their meanings. His answers to the key question: "How can we distance the domain names from the catalytic influence of trademark law" stand to pave a path to fairer and more neutral treatment of domain names for people around the world. This is an unprecedented book.' Kathryn A. Kleiman, Esq., Senior Internet Law and Policy Attorney, Internet Matters, USA

As ICANN proceeds to expand generic top level domains, this timely and thorough critique of the legal regulation of the domain space provides a necessary analysis of the legal nature of domain names. Arguing that without sound ethical principles of equality, fairness and lawfulness underpinnings any regulation of the domain name space is flawed, Komaitis proffers well considered solutions for a just domain name polis firmly rooted in the experience of the first ten years of domain name dispute resolution.' Catherine Colston, University of Strathclyde, Scotland

'[ This book] provides a passionate yet legalistic and well-researched overview of the legal, institutional and ethical problems caused by the clash between domain names and trademarks. This is really the first decent book-length treatment of what is now a decade and a half of legal and political conflict between domain name registrants and trademark holders. But this is more than a static compilation and description of the subject: Komaitis has an original and fundamentally important argument to make.' Milton Mueller, Internet Governance Project, 2010

Table of legislation
xii
Table of cases
xiv
Preface xxiv
Selected acronyms xxvii
1 Introduction: taking on the sins of ICANN and the UDRP
1(8)
1.1 Problematising domain name disputes
3(2)
1.2 The research issue
5(1)
1.3 Designing the hypothesis
6(1)
1.4 Goals and plan of the book
7(2)
PART I Intellectual problem
9(62)
2 Contextualising property
11(13)
2.1 The place of property: where property law currently resides
14(5)
2.2 The political mapping of property
19(5)
3 Introducing trademarks
24(15)
3.1 Intellectual property and trademarks
25(2)
3.2 Defending trademarks
27(2)
3.3 The legal philosophy of trademarks
29(2)
3.4 The economic value of trademarks
31(4)
3.5 The political mapping of trademarks
35(4)
4 Domain names: their technological, socio-economic and legal status
39(32)
4.1 The technical nature of domain names: what's in a name?
41(3)
4.2 The socio-economic function of domain names
44(1)
4.3 Socio-economic norms in the domain name market
45(3)
4.4 Domain name legal theories
48(14)
4.5 Domain names as property
62(9)
PART II Institutional problem
71(76)
5 History of domain name institutionalisation
73(12)
5.1 ICANN's authority to create the UDRP
76(3)
5.2 The road to the UDRP
79(3)
5.3 ICANN launches the UDRP
82(3)
6 `Lex domainia': the new lex mercatoria?
85(4)
7 The UDRP and arbitration
89(7)
7.1 Justification of arbitration and the scope of the New York Convention
89(2)
7.2 Arbitration and the UDRP: the face-off
91(5)
8 Issues of procedural unfairness
96(17)
8.1 The UDRP restricts the legal rights of registrants
96(4)
8.2 Issues of inconsistency in a uniform system
100(7)
8.3 Can courts conduct a sufficient review of the UDRP?
107(6)
9 Free speech in the context of the UDRP
113(6)
10 Regulating domain names nationally: the case of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
119(22)
10.1 The U.S. approach prior to the enactment of ACPA
121(4)
10.2 The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
125(2)
10.3 The rationale behind in rem jurisdiction
127(2)
10.4 ACPA and in rem: a dangerous combination
129(7)
10.5 ACPA v. international institutions
136(3)
10.6 The incompatible status of gTLDs and national legislation
139(2)
11 Applying the UDRP and ACPA in the right context
141(6)
PART III Ethical problem
147(20)
12 `Haves' and `have nots'
149(18)
12.1 Ethical concerns in the context of the UDRP
151(9)
12.2 The domain name Πoλισ
160(7)
PART IV Themes and issues
167(30)
13 Forwards and backwards...
169(16)
13.1 Reconfiguring the regulation of domain names
172(1)
13.2 Procedural level
173(7)
13.3 Techno-legal level
180(2)
13.4 Political level
182(3)
14 Repeating the same mistakes: new gTLDs and the IRT recommendation report
185(12)
14.1 Injustice at a procedural level
187(2)
14.2 The report's substantive issues
189(6)
14.3 The taming of trademark protection
195(2)
Notes 197(39)
Bibliography 236(21)
Index 257
Konstantinos Komaitis (Ph.D, LLM (Strathclyde University) and LLM (University of Sheffield)) is a lecturer at the University of Strathclyde, UK. He was also a member of ICANN's Special Trademark Issues (STI) team and a drafter of the Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS) system.