|
|
xii | |
|
|
xiv | |
Preface |
|
xxiv | |
Selected acronyms |
|
xxvii | |
|
1 Introduction: taking on the sins of ICANN and the UDRP |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
1.1 Problematising domain name disputes |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.3 Designing the hypothesis |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.4 Goals and plan of the book |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
PART I Intellectual problem |
|
|
9 | (62) |
|
2 Contextualising property |
|
|
11 | (13) |
|
2.1 The place of property: where property law currently resides |
|
|
14 | (5) |
|
2.2 The political mapping of property |
|
|
19 | (5) |
|
|
24 | (15) |
|
3.1 Intellectual property and trademarks |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
3.3 The legal philosophy of trademarks |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
3.4 The economic value of trademarks |
|
|
31 | (4) |
|
3.5 The political mapping of trademarks |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
4 Domain names: their technological, socio-economic and legal status |
|
|
39 | (32) |
|
4.1 The technical nature of domain names: what's in a name? |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
4.2 The socio-economic function of domain names |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
4.3 Socio-economic norms in the domain name market |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
4.4 Domain name legal theories |
|
|
48 | (14) |
|
4.5 Domain names as property |
|
|
62 | (9) |
|
PART II Institutional problem |
|
|
71 | (76) |
|
5 History of domain name institutionalisation |
|
|
73 | (12) |
|
5.1 ICANN's authority to create the UDRP |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
5.3 ICANN launches the UDRP |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
6 `Lex domainia': the new lex mercatoria? |
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
7 The UDRP and arbitration |
|
|
89 | (7) |
|
7.1 Justification of arbitration and the scope of the New York Convention |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
7.2 Arbitration and the UDRP: the face-off |
|
|
91 | (5) |
|
8 Issues of procedural unfairness |
|
|
96 | (17) |
|
8.1 The UDRP restricts the legal rights of registrants |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
8.2 Issues of inconsistency in a uniform system |
|
|
100 | (7) |
|
8.3 Can courts conduct a sufficient review of the UDRP? |
|
|
107 | (6) |
|
9 Free speech in the context of the UDRP |
|
|
113 | (6) |
|
10 Regulating domain names nationally: the case of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act |
|
|
119 | (22) |
|
10.1 The U.S. approach prior to the enactment of ACPA |
|
|
121 | (4) |
|
10.2 The Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
10.3 The rationale behind in rem jurisdiction |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
10.4 ACPA and in rem: a dangerous combination |
|
|
129 | (7) |
|
10.5 ACPA v. international institutions |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
10.6 The incompatible status of gTLDs and national legislation |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
11 Applying the UDRP and ACPA in the right context |
|
|
141 | (6) |
|
|
147 | (20) |
|
12 `Haves' and `have nots' |
|
|
149 | (18) |
|
12.1 Ethical concerns in the context of the UDRP |
|
|
151 | (9) |
|
12.2 The domain name Πoλισ |
|
|
160 | (7) |
|
PART IV Themes and issues |
|
|
167 | (30) |
|
13 Forwards and backwards... |
|
|
169 | (16) |
|
13.1 Reconfiguring the regulation of domain names |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
|
173 | (7) |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
14 Repeating the same mistakes: new gTLDs and the IRT recommendation report |
|
|
185 | (12) |
|
14.1 Injustice at a procedural level |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
14.2 The report's substantive issues |
|
|
189 | (6) |
|
14.3 The taming of trademark protection |
|
|
195 | (2) |
Notes |
|
197 | (39) |
Bibliography |
|
236 | (21) |
Index |
|
257 | |