| Table of Cases |
|
xxvii | |
| Table of Legislation |
|
xxxix | |
| Table of Conventions and International Instruments |
|
xlix | |
| List of Contributors |
|
liii | |
| General Introduction: Free Speech, Democracy, and the Suppression of Extreme Speech Past and Present |
|
1 | |
|
James Weinstein and Ivan Hare |
|
|
|
1. The Enduring yet Troubled Marriage of Free Speech and Democracy |
|
|
1 | |
|
2. Is there a Lesson in this History? |
|
|
5 | |
| PART I: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND |
|
|
1. Freedom of Speech in a Globalized World |
|
|
11 | |
|
|
|
|
1. The Meaning of Freedom of Speech |
|
|
11 | |
|
(i) Freedom of Expression |
|
|
11 | |
|
(ii) Freedom of the Media |
|
|
14 | |
|
2. Freedom of Speech Under Globalized Conditions |
|
|
17 | |
|
(i) Protecting Religion from Speech? |
|
|
17 | |
|
(ii) More Uniformity of Speech-Related Law? |
|
|
19 | |
|
2. Extreme Speech, Public Order, and Democracy: Lessons from The Masses |
|
|
23 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 | |
|
2. The Core Free Speech Right of Democratic Participation |
|
|
25 | |
|
|
|
26 | |
|
(ii) The Individual Right of Political Participation |
|
|
27 | |
|
|
|
29 | |
|
3. Breaching the Core: Hammond v. DPP |
|
|
30 | |
|
(i) Facts and Divisional Court Decision |
|
|
30 | |
|
(ii) Identifying the Core Breach |
|
|
32 | |
|
(iii) A Countervailing Right Not to be Insulted? |
|
|
33 | |
|
(iv) Distinguishing Public Discourse from Personal Abuse |
|
|
35 | |
|
|
|
37 | |
|
4. Object Lessons from the US |
|
|
40 | |
|
5. Another Core Breach?: Norwood v. DPP |
|
|
44 | |
|
(i) Facts and Divisional Court Decision |
|
|
44 | |
|
(ii) Excluding Anti-Democratic Speech from Public Discourse |
|
|
47 | |
|
(iii) The Perils of Interpreting Ambiguous Political Rhetoric |
|
|
50 | |
|
6. Speech at the Periphery of the Core and the Strategy of Overprotection |
|
|
52 | |
|
|
|
53 | |
|
(ii) Advocacy of Law Violation |
|
|
53 | |
|
(iii) Expression Offending Civility Norms |
|
|
55 | |
|
|
|
58 | |
|
|
|
60 | |
|
3. Extreme Speech Under International and Regional Human Rights Standards |
|
|
62 | |
|
|
|
|
1. The History and Structure of International and Regional Human Rights Instruments |
|
|
62 | |
|
(i) International Human Rights Instruments |
|
|
63 | |
|
(ii) Regional Human Rights Instruments |
|
|
65 | |
|
|
|
69 | |
|
(i) Freedom of Expression Under the ICCPR |
|
|
69 | |
|
(ii) Freedom of Expression Under Regional Human Rights Instruments |
|
|
72 | |
|
3. The Effectiveness of International and Regional Human Rights Instruments in Protecting Extreme Speech |
|
|
74 | |
|
|
|
79 | |
|
4. An Overview of American Free Speech Doctrine and its Application to Extreme Speech |
|
|
81 | |
|
|
|
|
1. The Rule against Content Discrimination |
|
|
81 | |
|
2. The Rule against Content Discrimination and its Application to Extreme Speech |
|
|
84 | |
|
|
|
84 | |
|
(ii) Incitement to terrorism, Holocaust denial, and other forms of extreme speech |
|
|
88 | |
|
3. Methodological Differences |
|
|
90 | |
|
|
|
91 | |
|
5. Hate Speech in the United Kingdom: An Historical Overview |
|
|
92 | |
|
|
|
|
6. Extreme Speech and Liberalism |
|
|
96 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 | |
|
2. 'Who are the Extremists?' |
|
|
97 | |
|
3. Legal and Non-Legal Responses to Extreme Speech |
|
|
99 | |
|
(i) Criminalizing Extreme Speech: The Limits of Legal Regulation |
|
|
99 | |
|
(ii) Non-Legal Responses to Hate Speech: Cultural Policy and Media Regulation |
|
|
105 | |
|
4. Engaging with Extremists |
|
|
107 | |
|
(i) Liberal Democracy as a 'Rational Liberal Consensus': Containing Doctrines that Are 'Irrational, Unreasonable, and Mad' |
|
|
107 | |
|
(ii) Agonistic Respect: Creating Political Space for the Extremists |
|
|
109 | |
|
(iii) 'Discourse Ethics': What Are the Rules of the Game When 'Engaging with Extremists'? |
|
|
111 | |
|
(iv) Engaging with the 'Extremists' |
|
|
113 | |
|
(v) Applying the 'Rules of the Game' to Extremists: Classification, Protection, and Critique |
|
|
115 | |
|
(vi) Internal and External Critique of Extremists |
|
|
117 | |
|
(vii) The Limits of Democratic Discourse |
|
|
118 | |
|
|
|
120 | |
| PART II: HATE SPEECH |
|
|
|
|
123 | |
|
|
|
|
8. Autonomy and Hate Speech |
|
|
139 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 | |
|
2. Speaker Autonomy and State Legitimacy |
|
|
142 | |
|
3. Objections and a Pragmatic Reply |
|
|
146 | |
|
4. The Evils Restrictions May Cause |
|
|
150 | |
|
5. Conclusion: Democracy's Necessary Faith in People |
|
|
155 | |
|
9. Hate Speech, Public Discourse, and the First Amendment |
|
|
158 | |
|
|
|
|
1. The Foundations and Limits of the First Amendment Freedom of Expression |
|
|
159 | |
|
2. Should Public Hate Speech be Protected by the First Amendment? |
|
|
165 | |
|
(i) The Impact of Public Hate Speech on Other Rights |
|
|
165 | |
|
(ii) Should Public Hate Speech be Protected Because of Its Political Character? |
|
|
169 | |
|
(iii) Refining the Rights-Based Analysis of Public Hate Speech |
|
|
177 | |
|
|
|
181 | |
|
10. Wild-West Cowboys versus Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys: Some Problems in Comparative Approaches to Hate Speech |
|
|
182 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182 | |
|
2. The Locus of Comparison |
|
|
184 | |
|
|
|
187 | |
|
|
|
189 | |
|
5. Realism and Essentialism |
|
|
190 | |
|
6. Formal and Substantive Freedoms: An Age-Old Dilemma |
|
|
196 | |
|
|
|
200 | |
|
|
|
203 | |
|
11. Incitement and the Regulation of Hate Speech in Canada: A Philosophical Analysis |
|
|
204 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
204 | |
|
2. The Harms of Hate Speech |
|
|
207 | |
|
3. Promoting and Inciting |
|
|
212 | |
|
|
|
219 | |
|
12. Hate Speech, Extreme Speech, and Collective Defamation in French Law |
|
|
221 | |
|
|
|
|
1. Systematic Control of Hate Speech and Extreme Speech |
|
|
222 | |
|
|
|
223 | |
|
|
|
227 | |
|
(iii) General Observations |
|
|
228 | |
|
2. A Particular Rigour for Certain Types of Speech |
|
|
229 | |
|
(i) Overview of Collective Defamations |
|
|
229 | |
|
(ii) Religious Abuse and Defamation |
|
|
231 | |
|
(iii) Racial Abuse and Defamation |
|
|
234 | |
|
13. Towards Improved Law and Policy on 'Hate Speech'—The 'Clear and Present Danger' Test in Hungary |
|
|
237 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 | |
|
2. The Social Context of 'Hate Speech' in Hungary |
|
|
239 | |
|
3. The Application of the 'Clear and Present Danger Test' in Hungary |
|
|
247 | |
|
(i) The 'Hate Speech' Decisions of the Hungarian Constitutional Court |
|
|
247 | |
|
(ii) The Hegedus Jr. Case and Its Aftermath: The Failure Properly to Apply the Test |
|
|
257 | |
|
(iii) The Prohibition of the Public Display of Certain Totalitarian Symbols |
|
|
261 | |
|
|
|
263 | |
|
14. Cumulative Jurisprudence and Hate Speech: Sexual Orientation and Analogies to Disability, Age, and Obesity |
|
|
265 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 | |
|
2. Sexual Minorities and Cumulative Jurisprudence |
|
|
266 | |
|
3. Cumulative or Contradictory? |
|
|
272 | |
|
4. Some Objections and Replies |
|
|
280 | |
|
|
|
284 | |
| PART III: INCITEMENT TO RELIGIOUS HATRED AND RELATED TOPICS |
|
|
15. Blasphemy and Incitement to Religious Hatred: Free Speech Dogma and Doctrine |
|
|
289 | |
|
|
|
|
1. The Historical Relationship between Speech and the Protection of Religion: Blasphemy |
|
|
289 | |
|
2. Legislating Against Hate and the Repeal of the Law of Blasphemy |
|
|
293 | |
|
(i) Incitement to Religious Hatred |
|
|
294 | |
|
(ii) Repeal of the Law of Blasphemy |
|
|
296 | |
|
3. Free Speech Principle and the Protection of Religious Sensibilities |
|
|
300 | |
|
|
|
301 | |
|
(ii) Incitement to Religious Hatred |
|
|
305 | |
|
|
|
310 | |
|
16. The Danish Cartoons, Offensive Expression, and Democratic Legitimacy |
|
|
311 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
311 | |
|
2. Offensive Expression in European Convention Jurisprudence—Handyside Rhetoric and Reality |
|
|
314 | |
|
3. The Margin of Appreciation and the Absence of Consensus |
|
|
317 | |
|
4. A 'Right' to be Protected from Offensive Expression? |
|
|
319 | |
|
5. Offence as a Contents-Based Ground for Restricting Expression |
|
|
321 | |
|
6. Expression about Islam as 'Political Speech' |
|
|
323 | |
|
7. The Problem of Gratuitously Insulting or Gratuitously Offensive Speech |
|
|
325 | |
|
8. Putting the Breaks on Offensive Expression: Tipping Points and the Concept of Democratic Legitimacy |
|
|
327 | |
|
17. Criminalizing Religiously Offensive Satire: Free Speech, Human Dignity, and Comparative Law |
|
|
331 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
331 | |
|
|
|
332 | |
|
3. Offensive Speech: Diverging Normative Justifications |
|
|
333 | |
|
4. Offensive Speech: Is Religion Normatively Special? |
|
|
337 | |
|
5. Citizens, State, and Speech |
|
|
340 | |
|
6. The Cultural Significance of Speech |
|
|
342 | |
|
7. Legal Cultures—Balancing Words |
|
|
345 | |
|
8. Beyond Differences: The Doctrine of Fighting Words |
|
|
348 | |
|
9. Some Heretical Reflections on Speech Theory and the Role of Passion |
|
|
350 | |
|
|
|
352 | |
| PART IV: RELIGIOUS SPEECH AND EXPRESSIVE CONDUCT THAT OFFEND SECULAR VALUES |
|
|
18. Religious Speech that Undermines Gender Equality |
|
|
357 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
357 | |
|
2. Religious Speech that Offends against Gender Equality |
|
|
358 | |
|
(i) Construction of Gendered Hierarchies |
|
|
359 | |
|
(ii) Incitement or Condoning of Violence against Women |
|
|
360 | |
|
|
|
362 | |
|
|
|
363 | |
|
|
|
364 | |
|
4. Empowering Religious Women's Speech |
|
|
368 | |
|
(i) The Importance of Religious Women's Speech |
|
|
368 | |
|
(ii) Practical Strategies for Empowering Religious Women's Speech |
|
|
370 | |
|
|
|
373 | |
|
19. Homophobic Speech, Equality Denial, and Religious Expression |
|
|
375 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
375 | |
|
2. Laws Prohibiting Homophobic Expression |
|
|
379 | |
|
3. International Responses |
|
|
380 | |
|
|
|
381 | |
|
5. The Status of Religiously-Motivated Speech |
|
|
388 | |
|
|
|
388 | |
|
|
|
391 | |
|
6. Adjudicating Rights Conflicts |
|
|
393 | |
|
|
|
398 | |
|
20. Extreme Religious Dress: Perspectives on Veiling Controversies |
|
|
400 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 | |
|
2. Speech and Religious Dress |
|
|
401 | |
|
3. Human Rights Perspectives |
|
|
402 | |
|
(i) Individual Applications to National Courts |
|
|
402 | |
|
(ii) Individual Applications to International Human Rights Bodies |
|
|
403 | |
|
(iii) Individual and Group Identities and Rights |
|
|
405 | |
|
(iv) Minority Rights and Cultural Rights |
|
|
406 | |
|
(v) The Right to Freedom of Religion |
|
|
407 | |
|
(vi) Negative and Positive Aspects of a Human Right |
|
|
408 | |
|
(vii) The Human Rights Context of Church–State Relations under the ECHR |
|
|
409 | |
|
(viii) Limitations on Religious Freedoms on the Basis of the 'protection of public order' and the 'protection of the rights and freedoms of others' |
|
|
410 | |
|
|
|
411 | |
|
|
|
411 | |
|
(ii) Teachers' Rights and Children's Rights |
|
|
414 | |
|
|
|
416 | |
|
|
|
416 | |
|
(i) Religious Discrimination and Islamophobia |
|
|
416 | |
|
(ii) Religious Discrimination and the European Union |
|
|
418 | |
|
(iii) Racial Discrimination |
|
|
419 | |
|
(iv) Gender Discrimination and Feminist Perspectives |
|
|
420 | |
|
(v) Intersecting Discrimination |
|
|
424 | |
|
|
|
424 | |
|
7. Explaining Differential Human Rights Outcomes: The Margin of Appreciation |
|
|
427 | |
|
8. Locating the Debates on Religious Dress |
|
|
427 | |
|
21. Endorsing Discrimination Between Faiths: A Case of Extreme Speech? |
|
|
430 | |
|
|
|
|
1. Legitimate, if not Necessary, School Ban on a Garment |
|
|
430 | |
|
2. Necessary State Ban on a Party and Government |
|
|
433 | |
|
3. A Certain Religion's Unacceptable Political Purposes |
|
|
437 | |
|
4. Applying the Findings: Extreme Speech or Belated Warning? |
|
|
439 | |
| PART V: INCITEMENT TO, AND GLORIFICATION OF, TERRORISM |
|
|
22. Incitement to, and Glorification of, Terrorism |
|
|
445 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
445 | |
|
2. The Terrorism Act 2006 |
|
|
446 | |
|
3. The Encouragement of Terrorism and Freedom of Speech |
|
|
447 | |
|
|
|
449 | |
|
5. A Speaker's Right to Encourage Terrorism? |
|
|
451 | |
|
|
|
452 | |
|
|
|
454 | |
|
(i) The Words Used by the Speaker or Writer |
|
|
455 | |
|
(ii) Advocacy Directed to Inciting or Producing Unlawful Action |
|
|
456 | |
|
(iii) The Requirement of Imminent Unlawful Action |
|
|
457 | |
|
(iv) Likely to Incite or Produce Unlawful Action |
|
|
458 | |
|
8. The Brandenburg Principle Inapplicable to Threats and Conspiracy |
|
|
459 | |
|
9. The Relevance of Terrorism |
|
|
461 | |
|
23. The Terrorism Act 2006: Discouraging Terrorism |
|
|
463 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
463 | |
|
|
|
465 | |
|
3. The Terrorism Act 2006 |
|
|
466 | |
|
4. The Radicalization Process |
|
|
473 | |
|
5. The Counterproductive Potential of Counterterrorism Laws |
|
|
481 | |
|
|
|
486 | |
|
24. Radical Religious Speech: The Ingredients of a Binary World View |
|
|
488 | |
|
Sara Savage and Jose Liht |
|
|
|
1. Introduction: The Shaping Power of Language |
|
|
488 | |
|
2. Structural Features of Islamist Radical Religious Discourse |
|
|
489 | |
|
|
|
489 | |
|
(ii) Rhetorical Strategies |
|
|
492 | |
|
(iii) Propositional, Word-Based Processing |
|
|
495 | |
|
|
|
496 | |
|
(v) Integrative Complexity |
|
|
497 | |
|
|
|
498 | |
|
(vii) The Myth of Pure Evil |
|
|
499 | |
|
3. The Appeal of Islamist Extreme Speech |
|
|
500 | |
|
|
|
504 | |
|
|
|
507 | |
| PART VI: HOLOCAUST DENIAL |
|
|
25. 'On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Nazi': Some Comparative Legal Aspects of Holocaust Denial on the WIVIV |
|
|
511 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
511 | |
|
2. The Context of Holocaust Denial |
|
|
514 | |
|
3. YAHOO!, the WWW, and French Legal Regulation of Holocaust Denial |
|
|
521 | |
|
4. Canada: Zundel, the Web, and the Success (?) of Law |
|
|
529 | |
|
5. Australia, the Law, and Holocaust Denial |
|
|
534 | |
|
|
|
536 | |
|
26. Expanding Holocaust Denial and Legislation Against It |
|
|
538 | |
|
|
|
|
1. Holocaust Denial and the Internet |
|
|
539 | |
|
2. International Agreements |
|
|
541 | |
|
|
|
543 | |
|
4. Successful Prosecution |
|
|
545 | |
|
5. The European Common Framework |
|
|
547 | |
|
|
|
548 | |
|
7. The Iranian Government's Initiative |
|
|
551 | |
|
|
|
552 | |
|
|
|
553 | |
|
10. The Necessity of Holocaust Education |
|
|
555 | |
|
27. The Holocaust Denial Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany |
|
|
557 | |
|
|
|
|
28. The Politics of Memory: Bans and Commemorations |
|
|
562 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 | |
|
2. Permanent Elimination of Slavery in 1848 |
|
|
566 | |
|
3. Consecration of the Republic |
|
|
568 | |
|
4. Commemorations and Bans with Respect to the Genocide of the Jews in Europe |
|
|
571 | |
|
|
|
575 | |
| PART VII: GOVERNMENTAL AND SELF-REGULATION OF THE MEDIA |
|
|
29. Shouting Fire From the Nanny State to the Heckler's Veto: The New Censorship and How to Counter It |
|
|
583 | |
|
|
|
|
30. Extreme Speech and American Press Freedoms |
|
|
598 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
598 | |
|
|
|
600 | |
|
3. Near, Sullivan, and Brandenburg |
|
|
600 | |
|
4. Rhetorical Hyperbole, Vigorous Epithets, and Parody |
|
|
603 | |
|
5. Incitement, True Threats, and Fighting Words |
|
|
604 | |
|
6. The Marketplace and Evolving Norms of Civility |
|
|
605 | |
|
31. Extreme Speech and the Democratic Functions of the Mass Media |
|
|
608 | |
|
|
|
|
1. Media Freedom and Democracy |
|
|
609 | |
|
|
|
610 | |
|
(ii) Diverse Information and Ideas |
|
|
613 | |
|
2. Extreme Speech and Media Regulation |
|
|
618 | |
|
|
|
619 | |
|
|
|
626 | |
|
|
|
629 | |
| Index |
|
631 | |