Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

E-raamat: Idea of Arbitration [Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud]

(Holder of Michael Klein Distinguished Scholar Chair, University of Miami)
  • Formaat: 332 pages
  • Sari: Clarendon Law Series
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Nov-2013
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-13: 9780199564163
  • Oxford Scholarship Online e-raamatud
  • Raamatu hind pole hetkel teada
  • Formaat: 332 pages
  • Sari: Clarendon Law Series
  • Ilmumisaeg: 21-Nov-2013
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-13: 9780199564163
What is arbitration? This volume provides a novel theoretical examination of the concept of arbitration, attempting to answer fundamental questions which have rarely been addressed systematically in English. It explores the place of arbitration in the legal process, offering a challenging, yet accessible overview of the field and its theoretical underpinnings and contending that arbitration is important enough to be understood in its own terms, as a sui generis feature of social life.

Why do individuals, companies, and States choose to go to arbitration rather than through litigation? Arbitration can offer increased flexibility and confidentiality, and provides the parties with the opportunity to select the arbitrators. But what makes them want to confide in an arbitrator rather than use the more traditional legal mechanisms for settling disputes?

This volume explores what the parties can expect of an arbitrator and whether and how the conduct of an arbitrator might be questioned and under what authority. It examines the ethical challenges to arbitral authority and its moral hazards, evaluating the promises and dangers of self-contained systems of decision-making and compliance.
Table of Cases
xiii
List of Abbreviations
xix
Note on Previous Work xx
1 The Impulse to Arbitrate
1(28)
1.1 Fundamental Speculations
1(3)
1.2 The Arbitrator as Archetype
4(3)
1.3 Arbitral Virtues
7(3)
1.4 Dubious Historical Parallels
10(3)
1.5 Ambivalence Toward Law
13(5)
1.6 Untidy Realities
18(6)
1.7 The Nobler Objective: Good Courts
24(5)
2 The Legal Foundations of Arbitration
29(22)
2.1 Matters of Definition
30(2)
2.2 The Territorial Thesis
32(3)
2.3 The Pluralistic Thesis
35(4)
2.4 A False Start
39(6)
2.5 The Pluralistic Thesis Revised
45(3)
2.6 Three-dimensional Reality
48(3)
3 Private Challenges
51(48)
3.1 Jurisdictional Controversies: Who Decides Them, and When
53(29)
(A) Kompetenz-Kompetenz
54(4)
(B) The concept of negative effect
58(2)
(C) Separability demystified
60(12)
(D) American struggles with `arbitrability'
72(5)
(E) An overarching presumption
77(5)
3.2 Jurisdiction Distinguished from Admissibility
82(8)
3.3 The Right to be Heard
90(3)
3.4 Substantive Errors
93(6)
4 The Public Challenge
99(48)
4.1 The Tension between Public Regulation and Arbitration
100(4)
4.2 Why Should Arbitration be Allowed at All?
104(4)
4.3 Unduly Procured Consent
108(7)
4.4 Excluded Areas
115(8)
4.5 Should Arbitrators be Allowed to Apply the Law?
123(6)
4.6 Should Arbitrators be Allowed to Decide Issues of Public Policy?
129(16)
(A) Public policy and judicial restraint
130(3)
(B) Arbitrators' right and duty to apply mandatory laws
133(4)
(C) Illegal contracts and public policy
137(1)
(D) The finality of arbitral rulings on public policy claims
138(7)
4.7 Recapitulation: Degrees of Arbitral Authority
145(2)
5 Ethical Challenges
147(27)
5.1 The Weak Spot
147(2)
5.2 Fitness to Serve
149(3)
5.3 The Limited Benefits of Disclosure
152(1)
5.4 Moral Hazard and the Unilateral Nominee
153(13)
(A) The worm in the apple
153(11)
(B) Dubious assumptions
164(2)
5.5 Motivation
166(1)
5.6 The Trouble with Dissents
167(2)
5.7 Breaking Faith
169(2)
5.8 The Case for an Elitist Approach
171(3)
6 International Challenges
174(26)
6.1 The Hubris of Monopoly
174(4)
6.2 Clashes of Culture?
178(1)
6.3 Inequality of Arms
179(4)
6.4 Operating in Three Dimensions
183(17)
(A) The necessity of invention
183(10)
(B) An apter model for a fluid world
193(7)
7 National Public Policy in the International Environment: Avoiding the Chancellor's Foot
200(31)
7.1 Recurrent Problems
200(7)
7.2 Concepts and Nomenclature
207(2)
7.3 Public Policy and Concurrent Court Proceedings
209(4)
7.4 Public Policy and Courts that Intervene after the Award
213(11)
7.5 Public Policy and Arbitrators
224(5)
7.6 Recapitulation
229(2)
8 Arbitral Authority to Reject Unlawful Laws
231(25)
8.1 Applicable Law Means More Than Statutes and Decrees
231(3)
8.2 National Checks on Unlawful Laws
234(3)
8.3 The Application of National Corrective Norms
237(3)
8.4 Two Illustrations
240(3)
8.5 Matters of Legal Philosophy
243(3)
8.6 Pierre Mayer's `Realistic' Objections
246(8)
8.7 Ten Short Propositions
254(2)
9 Images in a Crystal Ball
256(47)
9.1 Empowerment through Responsible Self-governance
256(3)
9.2 Symbiosis of Judges and Arbitrators
259(14)
(A) Are judges jealous of arbitrators?
259(4)
(B) Common objectives
263(2)
(C) Complementarities
265(3)
(D) Indispensable dialogue
268(3)
(E) The attraction of specialized courts
271(2)
9.3 Open Doors
273(3)
9.4 Decline of Unilateral Appointments
276(7)
(A) Understanding the debate
276(1)
(B) The special case of inter-state arbitrations
277(1)
(C) Reasons to avoid unilaterals
278(3)
(D) If we must live with them...
281(2)
9.5 Designing Legitimacy for `A Nation of Devils'
283(10)
(A) Transparency
286(1)
(B) Engagement with the community of users
287(1)
(C) Barriers to entrenchment and conflicts of interest
288(2)
(D) Standards and sanctions
290(1)
(E) Appeal?
291(2)
9.6 Resurgence of the Influence of Scholarship
293(5)
9.7 Virtuous Circles
298(5)
Index 303
Jan Paulsson holds the Michael Klein Distinguished Scholar Chair at the University of Miami School of Law, and frequently acts as advocate or arbitrator in international disputes. For 20 years, he headed the international arbitration and public international law groups at the law firm Freshfields.
Ei ole sisse logitud.