|
|
|
xiii | |
|
|
|
xix | |
| Note on Previous Work |
|
xx | |
|
1 The Impulse to Arbitrate |
|
|
1 | (28) |
|
1.1 Fundamental Speculations |
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
1.2 The Arbitrator as Archetype |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
1.4 Dubious Historical Parallels |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
1.5 Ambivalence Toward Law |
|
|
13 | (5) |
|
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
1.7 The Nobler Objective: Good Courts |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
2 The Legal Foundations of Arbitration |
|
|
29 | (22) |
|
2.1 Matters of Definition |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
2.2 The Territorial Thesis |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2.3 The Pluralistic Thesis |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
|
|
39 | (6) |
|
2.5 The Pluralistic Thesis Revised |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
2.6 Three-dimensional Reality |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
|
|
51 | (48) |
|
3.1 Jurisdictional Controversies: Who Decides Them, and When |
|
|
53 | (29) |
|
|
|
54 | (4) |
|
(B) The concept of negative effect |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
(C) Separability demystified |
|
|
60 | (12) |
|
(D) American struggles with `arbitrability' |
|
|
72 | (5) |
|
(E) An overarching presumption |
|
|
77 | (5) |
|
3.2 Jurisdiction Distinguished from Admissibility |
|
|
82 | (8) |
|
3.3 The Right to be Heard |
|
|
90 | (3) |
|
|
|
93 | (6) |
|
|
|
99 | (48) |
|
4.1 The Tension between Public Regulation and Arbitration |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
4.2 Why Should Arbitration be Allowed at All? |
|
|
104 | (4) |
|
4.3 Unduly Procured Consent |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
|
|
115 | (8) |
|
4.5 Should Arbitrators be Allowed to Apply the Law? |
|
|
123 | (6) |
|
4.6 Should Arbitrators be Allowed to Decide Issues of Public Policy? |
|
|
129 | (16) |
|
(A) Public policy and judicial restraint |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
(B) Arbitrators' right and duty to apply mandatory laws |
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
(C) Illegal contracts and public policy |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
(D) The finality of arbitral rulings on public policy claims |
|
|
138 | (7) |
|
4.7 Recapitulation: Degrees of Arbitral Authority |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
|
147 | (27) |
|
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
5.3 The Limited Benefits of Disclosure |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
5.4 Moral Hazard and the Unilateral Nominee |
|
|
153 | (13) |
|
(A) The worm in the apple |
|
|
153 | (11) |
|
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
5.6 The Trouble with Dissents |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
5.8 The Case for an Elitist Approach |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
6 International Challenges |
|
|
174 | (26) |
|
6.1 The Hubris of Monopoly |
|
|
174 | (4) |
|
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
|
179 | (4) |
|
6.4 Operating in Three Dimensions |
|
|
183 | (17) |
|
(A) The necessity of invention |
|
|
183 | (10) |
|
(B) An apter model for a fluid world |
|
|
193 | (7) |
|
7 National Public Policy in the International Environment: Avoiding the Chancellor's Foot |
|
|
200 | (31) |
|
|
|
200 | (7) |
|
7.2 Concepts and Nomenclature |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
7.3 Public Policy and Concurrent Court Proceedings |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
7.4 Public Policy and Courts that Intervene after the Award |
|
|
213 | (11) |
|
7.5 Public Policy and Arbitrators |
|
|
224 | (5) |
|
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
8 Arbitral Authority to Reject Unlawful Laws |
|
|
231 | (25) |
|
8.1 Applicable Law Means More Than Statutes and Decrees |
|
|
231 | (3) |
|
8.2 National Checks on Unlawful Laws |
|
|
234 | (3) |
|
8.3 The Application of National Corrective Norms |
|
|
237 | (3) |
|
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
8.5 Matters of Legal Philosophy |
|
|
243 | (3) |
|
8.6 Pierre Mayer's `Realistic' Objections |
|
|
246 | (8) |
|
8.7 Ten Short Propositions |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
9 Images in a Crystal Ball |
|
|
256 | (47) |
|
9.1 Empowerment through Responsible Self-governance |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
9.2 Symbiosis of Judges and Arbitrators |
|
|
259 | (14) |
|
(A) Are judges jealous of arbitrators? |
|
|
259 | (4) |
|
|
|
263 | (2) |
|
|
|
265 | (3) |
|
(D) Indispensable dialogue |
|
|
268 | (3) |
|
(E) The attraction of specialized courts |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
|
|
273 | (3) |
|
9.4 Decline of Unilateral Appointments |
|
|
276 | (7) |
|
(A) Understanding the debate |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
(B) The special case of inter-state arbitrations |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
(C) Reasons to avoid unilaterals |
|
|
278 | (3) |
|
(D) If we must live with them... |
|
|
281 | (2) |
|
9.5 Designing Legitimacy for `A Nation of Devils' |
|
|
283 | (10) |
|
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
(B) Engagement with the community of users |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
(C) Barriers to entrenchment and conflicts of interest |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
(D) Standards and sanctions |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
9.6 Resurgence of the Influence of Scholarship |
|
|
293 | (5) |
|
|
|
298 | (5) |
| Index |
|
303 | |