| Foreword |
|
vii | |
| Acknowledgements |
|
ix | |
|
|
|
xix | |
|
List of Tables and Figures |
|
|
xxi | |
| Introduction |
|
1 | (16) |
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
II An Orientation to Key Concepts |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
III Contribution to Socio-Legal Scholarship |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
IV Outline of the Book's Content and Argument |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
V A Note on Case Study Selection and Methodology |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
VI The Structure of this Book |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
PART I ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR VULNERABLE AND ENERGY-POOR CONSUMERS |
|
|
|
1 The Access to Justice Challenge |
|
|
17 | (24) |
|
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
II The Scale and Nature of the Access to Justice Challenge |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
III Understanding the Barriers to Access to Justice |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
A Factors that Impact on People's Ability to Name a Problem |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
B Factors that Impact on People's Ability to Blame Someone for a Problem |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
C Factors that Impact on People's Ability to Make a Claim in Relation to their Problem |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
IV Particular Barriers Facing Energy Consumers |
|
|
24 | (6) |
|
A The Nature of the Energy Market |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
B Cost and Rational Apathy |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
C `Behavioural Consumers' |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
D Unrealistic Expectations of Energy Consumers |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
V Consumer Vulnerability and Energy Poverty as Barriers to Accessing Justice |
|
|
30 | (4) |
|
A Moving Beyond `Generalist' Approaches to Access to Justice |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
B Denning Vulnerability and Energy Poverty |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
VI Barriers Experienced by Vulnerable and Energy-Poor Consumers: Highlights from Our Data |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
A Lived Experiences of Energy Poverty and Vulnerability |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
B Stretched Public Services and Community Support |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
C The Energy Market and Technology |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
2 A Holistic Vision of Access to Justice |
|
|
41 | (24) |
|
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
II Access to Justice Beyond Lawyers and Courts |
|
|
42 | (10) |
|
A Narrow, Court-Centric Approaches to Access to Justice |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
B A More Holistic Approach |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
C Everyday Justice Problems |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
D Culture, Context and Dispute Resolution |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
E ADR and Internal Complaint Mechanisms |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
F Advice and Non-Legal Sources of Help |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
III Beyond Procedural Access to Justice |
|
|
52 | (9) |
|
A Access to Justice as Access to Substantively Just Outcomes |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
B From Individual to Social Justice: Access to Justice as a Collective Problem |
|
|
54 | (4) |
|
C Energy Justice as an Integrative Framework |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
IV Reforming Access to Justice |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
3 European Union Law and Policy on Access to Justice |
|
|
65 | (22) |
|
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
II Recognition of Vulnerability and Energy Poverty in EU Law and Policy |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
A The Concept of Vulnerability in Consumer Protection Law |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
B Vulnerability and Energy Poverty in Energy Law |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
III The Development of ADR for Consumer Disputes in the Energy Sector |
|
|
71 | (8) |
|
A The Growth of ADR in Civil Justice Systems |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
B The EU Legislative Framework for Consumer Energy Disputes |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
C Drivers for the Development of ADR Provisions for Consumers in the EU Legislative Framework |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
D Diversity of ADR in the European Energy Sector |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
IV Access to Justice, Collective Redress and Consumer Protection Measures |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
B Substantive Rights and Consumer Protection Mechanisms |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
V Ongoing Problems for Vulnerable and Energy-Poor Consumers in the European Energy Market |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
4 ADR and Access to Justice |
|
|
87 | (22) |
|
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
II Initial Observations Based on the Access to Justice Literature |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
III The Critical Debate on Access to Justice and ADR |
|
|
89 | (6) |
|
A The Effectiveness Debate |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
|
|
92 | (3) |
|
IV Specific Issues in the Consumer-Disputing Context |
|
|
95 | (12) |
|
A The Persistence of the Access to Justice Gap |
|
|
95 | (4) |
|
B Settlement-Focused Critiques and the Enduring Value of Courts |
|
|
99 | (4) |
|
C The Quality and Effectiveness of ADR |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
5 ADR and Access to Justice: Empirical Insights |
|
|
109 | (24) |
|
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
|
|
110 | (12) |
|
A Current Levels of Access to Justice |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
B Barriers to Accessing ADR |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
i Lack of Awareness and Reach of ADR |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
ii The Practices of Energy Suppliers |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
iii Regulatory Barriers and ADR Processes |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
iv Technological Barriers |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
C The Role and Limits of ADR |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
i Consumer Expectations of ADR |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
ii Limits in the Support ADR can Provide to Consumers |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
iii Limits in Addressing the Fundamental Problems Facing Energy Consumers |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
D The Need for ADR to Develop Partnerships and Systemic Approaches |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
i The Importance of Partnership |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
ii Third-Sector Partnerships |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
iii Partnerships with Energy Suppliers |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
|
122 | (9) |
|
A The Access to Justice Challenge |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
B The Barriers that Stand in the Way of Accessing ADR |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
C Adapting Services to Deal with Vulnerable Users |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
D Questions about the Proper Role of ADR |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
E Partnership and Systemic Working |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
6 Everyday Experiences and the Role of Local Actors |
|
|
133 | (22) |
|
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
II Legal Alienation, Relational Distance and Access to Justice |
|
|
136 | (4) |
|
III Vulnerable and Energy-Poor Consumers, the Energy Market and Formal Institutions: Stories of Alienation and Disconnection |
|
|
140 | (9) |
|
A Alienation and Relational Distance in Our Data |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
i Apathy, Cynicism and Disconnection |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
ii High Relational Distance: The Different Worlds of Consumers and Formal Institutions |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
iii An Insight into the Lives of Vulnerable and Energy-Poor Consumers |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
B Billing: A Site of Alienation and High Relational Distance |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
IV Local Actors: More than Intermediaries |
|
|
149 | (5) |
|
A Community Action in the North-East of England |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
B Energy Advice and Intervention in Catalonia |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
C Charity Work in the North of France |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
7 Towards a More Holistic System of Access to Justice |
|
|
155 | (28) |
|
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
II Recapping the Argument of the Book |
|
|
155 | (5) |
|
III Dispute System Design and the Delivery of Holistic Access to Justice |
|
|
160 | (6) |
|
A A Developing Consensus Around the Ombuds Model |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
B Towards a More Inclusive, Preventative and Therapeutic Access to Justice |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
C Consumer Participation in the Design of Access to Justice Policies and Institutions |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
IV From Added Value to Inclusive Design: Overview of Design Options |
|
|
166 | (11) |
|
A Option 1: Improve the `Supply' of ADR |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
B Option 2: Increase the `Demand' for ADR |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
C Option 3: Decrease the `Demand' for ADR |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
D Functional Overlaps, Partnership and Domain Legitimacy |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
V Limitations and Directions for Future Research |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
|
178 | (5) |
|
PART II ACCESS TO JUSTICE, ADR AND ENERGY POVERTY IN FIVE COUNTRIES |
|
|
|
8 Introduction to Part II |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
9 Energy Injustice in Bulgaria |
|
|
185 | (30) |
|
|
|
|
|
185 | (4) |
|
II Energy Poverty in Bulgaria |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
III Consumer Protection Mechanism |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
IV Key Areas of Energy Injustice |
|
|
195 | (2) |
|
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
V The Energy Injustice Labyrinth in Bulgaria |
|
|
197 | (8) |
|
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
C Local/Municipalities Ombudsmen |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
D Energy Ombudsman at the Electricity Supplier CEZ |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
VI Constraints for Energy Justice in Bulgaria |
|
|
205 | (7) |
|
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
D Legal Limitations to the National Ombudsman's Rights |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
E Questionable Status of the EWRC |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
F Physical Persons Bankruptcy Act |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
G CCP, EWRC Members Election |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
10 Energy Poverty and Access to Justice in Catalonia |
|
|
215 | (24) |
|
|
|
Enric R Bartlett Castella |
|
|
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
II The Spanish Electrical System |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
III Vulnerable Consumers and Access to Energy Justice in Catalonia |
|
|
219 | (12) |
|
A The Emergence of Energy Poverty in the Political and Policy Agenda in Catalonia |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
B The Catalan Housing Emergency and Energy Poverty Measures Act (Law 24/2015) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
C The National Strategy on Energy Poverty in Spain and its Impact in Catalonia |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
D The Intervention of the Catalan Ombudsman |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
i The Institutional Framework for the Ombudsman's Action |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
iii Recommendations for Regulatory Changes |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
E Other Actors Intervening in Energy Poverty Situations |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
i The Intervention of Catalan Local Administrations |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
ii The Alliance against Energy Poverty: The Right to Energy Approach |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
F Alternative Resolution of Consumer Disputes and Social Bonus |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
i Complaints to Suppliers |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
ii Consumer Arbitration in the Face of Disagreement with the Resolution of the Claim |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
IV Energy Poverty: What are the Gaps in the Current Measures? |
|
|
231 | (5) |
|
A Households' Debt Accumulation and Sustainable Future Solutions |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
B Energy-Poor Population Out of Policies' Scope |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
C Practices of Recovery Companies Contracted by Marketers |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
D The Transfer of Debt by Providers |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
E Aid that does not Reach its Recipients |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
F Registration as a Requirement to Contract Supplies |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
G Vulnerable Consumers and Procedural Energy Justice |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
V Moving Towards a Just Energy Model: Policy Implications |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
A Good Practices in Community-Based Organisations: From Vulnerable Consumers to Empowered Citizens |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
B The Future Catalan Energy Transition Act: An Opportunity |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
11 Access to Justice and Energy Poverty in France |
|
|
239 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
III A Complex ADR Landscape: Divided between the National Public Ombudsman, Company Mediators and Other Public Parties |
|
|
242 | (5) |
|
A Company Mediators (Internal Company Ombudsman) |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
B Mediateur National de l'Energie (National Energy Ombudsman) |
|
|
244 | (2) |
|
C Landlord-Tenant Mediation |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
IV What are the Barriers to Access Justice for Energy Consumers? |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
V What Role does ADR (Ombuds) Play in Accessing Justice for Energy-Poor and Vulnerable Consumers? |
|
|
248 | (4) |
|
A Access to Advice and Information |
|
|
248 | (2) |
|
|
|
250 | (2) |
|
VI How can Vulnerable Consumers Access Justice? |
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
A State Level, Private Level, Local Initiatives? |
|
|
252 | (2) |
|
VII What can be done to Improve the Situation? |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
A EU Level, National Level |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
12 Access to Justice for Vulnerable and Energy-Poor Consumers in Italy: Policy Measures and the Role of ADR |
|
|
257 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
I Italian Policies to Tackle Energy Poverty |
|
|
257 | (4) |
|
II Access to Justice for Vulnerable and Energy-Poor Consumers in Italy: The Role of ADR |
|
|
261 | (13) |
|
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
B ADR, Right of Defence and Free Legal Assistance |
|
|
262 | (2) |
|
C The Main Types of ADR in Italy are Inadequate to be Applied in Cases of Energy Disputes Involving Energy-Poor Consumers |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
D Own Initiatives of the Authority: Memoranda of Understanding and Joint Negotiation |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
E The Third Energy Package: The ARERA Conciliation Service and the `Smart Help Service' |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
i The Conciliation Service |
|
|
268 | (2) |
|
ii The Consumer Help Desk and the Smart Help Service |
|
|
270 | (2) |
|
iii Overview of Advantages of Main ADR Tools |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
F Directive 2013/11/EU and the Attempt at Conciliation as a Mandatory Condition for any Subsequent Appeal to the Court |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
G The `Third Level' of Protection: ARERA as a Decision-Making Body |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
III Data on ADR Procedures in the Energy Sector |
|
|
274 | (6) |
|
A The Conciliation Service |
|
|
274 | (5) |
|
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
|
|
280 | (3) |
|
13 Access to Justice in Energy: United Kingdom |
|
|
283 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
II The Legal Framework of Energy Regulation in Great Britain |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
III The GB Energy Industry |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
IV The Fuel Poverty Strategy |
|
|
287 | (5) |
|
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
B Ofgem's Vulnerability Strategy |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
V Complaints against Energy Companies |
|
|
292 | (9) |
|
A Complaints and Consumers in Vulnerable Circumstances |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
B Company Complaint Handling |
|
|
294 | (3) |
|
C The Role of Ombudsman Services: Energy |
|
|
297 | (4) |
|
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
|
|
301 | (2) |
| Index |
|
303 | |