Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals: A Study of Tribunal Adjudication [Pehme köide]

(University of Manchester, UK)
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 342 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 234x156x17 mm, kaal: 485 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 18-Jan-2011
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 184113936X
  • ISBN-13: 9781841139364
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Pehme köide
  • Hind: 140,25 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 165,00 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Raamatukogudele
    • Hart e-raamatud
  • Formaat: Paperback / softback, 342 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 234x156x17 mm, kaal: 485 g
  • Ilmumisaeg: 18-Jan-2011
  • Kirjastus: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 184113936X
  • ISBN-13: 9781841139364
Teised raamatud teemal:
FIRST PRIZE WINNER OF THE SLS BIRKS PRIZE FOR OUTSTANDING LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP 2011



How are we to assess and evaluate the quality of the tribunal systems that do the day-to-day work of adjudicating upon the disputes individuals have with government? This book examines how the idea of adjudicative quality works in practice by presenting a detailed case-study of the tribunal system responsible for determining appeals lodged by foreign nationals who claim that they will be at risk of persecution or ill-treatment on return to their country of origin. Over recent years, the asylum appeal process has become a major area of judicial decision-making and the most frequently restructured tribunal system. Asylum adjudication is also one of the most difficult areas of decision-making in the modern legal system.

Integrating empirical research with legal analysis, this book provides an in-depth study of the development and operation of this tribunal system and of asylum decision-making. The book examines how this particular appeal process seeks to mediate the tension between the competing values under which it operates. There are chapters examining the organisation of the tribunal system, its procedures, the nature of fact-finding in asylum cases and the operation of onward rights of challenge.

An examination as to how the tensions inherent in the idea of administrative justice are manifested in the context of a tribunal system responsible for making potentially life or death decisions, this book fills a gap in the literature and will be of value to those interested in administrative law and asylum adjudication.

Arvustused

This excellent work offers both a study of the asylum appeals system in the United Kingdom and a contribution to the broader stream of scholarship on administrative justice...It successfully performs the difficult double act of providing both an engaging introduction to the system's operation and considered detail and analysis of interest to those familiar with the jurisdiction.

A work immersed in the particular context of asylum appeals, Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals attends to the detail of the design and operation of the relevant tribunal processes, evaluating them against justice and managerial criteria. As a work on tribunal adjudication, Thomas argues both for an appreciation of the limits of what adjudication can achieve and for the benefits of inserting adjudication into the administrative process of determining eligibility for asylum. He makes a compelling case on both counts. -- Rayner Thwaites * The Modern Law Review, Volume 75, Issue 4 * Written in clear and accessible language, this book offers an in depth and insightful review of the operations and functioning of the asylum appellate jurisdiction.

A must read for those involved in the asylum decision-making process, this book is also highly recommended to anyone with an interest in administrative law or the asylum process itself.

[ The author's] assessment of the effectiveness and quality of asylum appeals is thought provoking and will almost certainly be a point of reference in future consultations and developments. -- C. J. Smith * Frontline, Volume 81 * ...an excellent analysis of refuge law which is underpinned by an empirical methodology that can rightly be compared to Mashaw's landmark study of American disability decision making. This landmark study will provide an enduring benchmark for any serious analysis of tribunals, administrative justice and refuge law and policy.

A particular strength of this book lies in its analysis of the assessment of the credibility of applicants for refugee status and the use of country information by migration tribunals. The investigation of each area moves beyond analysis of court and tribunal decisions and other publicly available information, to include interviews conducted by the author. The resulting analysis is steeped in practical insights. -- Matthew Groves * Australian Journal of Administrative Law, Volume 19, Issue 1 * For an up-to-date review of the development of the system and of the modern practice it is unnecessary to do more than refer to Robert Thomas' comprehensive study: Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals (2011) chapter 7. * Carnwath LJ in PO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [ 2011] EWCA Civ 132, para.48 * This book is densely packed with information, interest and insightit can serve as a practitioner's textbook just as much as an academic study of asylum adjudication, and may be read with profit by judges, advocates and Home Office officials. They will find it surprisingly useful in their day-to-day work.

A comprehensive guide full of insight -- Richard McKee * Tribunals Journal *

Muu info

Winner of Society of Legal Scholars Prize for Outstanding Legal Scholarship 2011 (UK).
Preface v
Table of Cases
xi
Table of Legislation
xxv
1 Administrative Justice, Quality and Asylum Adjudication
1(32)
Quality and Administrative Justice
3(13)
Asylum Adjudication
16(12)
Research Methods
28(3)
The Plan of the Book
31(2)
2 Asylum Decision-Making and its Organisation
33(34)
The Asylum Decision Problem
34(16)
Organising Decision-Making
50(11)
The Tribunal's Jurisdiction and Organisation
61(4)
Conclusion
65(2)
3 Costs, Accuracy and Decision Processes
67(34)
Considering Costs
69(8)
The Appeal Decision Process
77(17)
The Timeliness of Decision-Making
94(5)
Conclusion
99(2)
4 Appeal Hearings
101(33)
The Pre-Hearing Stage
101(6)
Substantive Hearings
107(12)
Immigration Judge Questioning and the Absence of Representation
119(9)
Closing the Hearing and Decision-Writing Targets
128(3)
Conclusion
131(3)
5 Credibility
134(33)
The Credibility Problem
134(6)
Assessing Credibility
140(19)
Hard Cases
159(2)
Weighing it all up
161(4)
Conclusion
165(2)
6 Country Information
167(29)
The Problem of Country Information
168(7)
Using Country Information
175(5)
Country Information and the Appeals Process
180(2)
Country Expert Evidence
182(12)
Conclusion
194(2)
7 Country Guidance
196(40)
The Country Guidance Concept
197(5)
Managing Country Guidance
202(4)
Assessing Country Information and Producing Guidance
206(8)
Binding Factual Precedent or Authoritative Guidance?
214(3)
Using Country Guidance
217(3)
Appraising Country Guidance
220(14)
Conclusion
234(2)
8 Onward Rights of Challenge
236(44)
The Benefits and Costs of Onward Challenges
237(3)
Organising Onward Challenges: An Excursus
240(19)
The Value of Onward Challenges
259(12)
Tribunals, Courts and Decision-Making Quality
271(7)
Conclusion
278(2)
9 Conclusion
280(15)
Evaluating Adjudicative Quality
281(6)
Reconsidering Asylum Adjudication
287(8)
Bibliography 295(14)
Index 309
Robert Thomas is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Law, University of Manchester.