Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

On the Affective Moods of Being: A Philosophical Exploration of Affects in Ibrahim Niasse's Thought [Kõva köide]

(Catholic Vocation High School in Strasbourg, France)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 240 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 218x140x20 mm, kaal: 440 g, 10 bw illus
  • Ilmumisaeg: 05-Feb-2026
  • Kirjastus: Bloomsbury Academic
  • ISBN-10: 1350530182
  • ISBN-13: 9781350530188
  • Kõva köide
  • Hind: 100,09 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 117,75 €
  • Säästad 15%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
  • Formaat: Hardback, 240 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 218x140x20 mm, kaal: 440 g, 10 bw illus
  • Ilmumisaeg: 05-Feb-2026
  • Kirjastus: Bloomsbury Academic
  • ISBN-10: 1350530182
  • ISBN-13: 9781350530188
An insightful comparison of Sufi Ibrahim Niasse's and Heidegger's philosophies that illustrate the interesting similarities and differences between their affective ontologies.

Philip Valentini places Senegalese scholar and Sufi Shaykh, Ibrahim Niasse (1900-1975) in dialogue with the German philosopher Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), as they meditate primarily on Being through the affects of human experience.

The fundamental difference between the two relies on their understanding of time, as Heidegger understands Death as the end of existence whilst Niasse understands existence to be steered towards the apocatastasis. However, Valentini delves deeper into the ways in which both their investigations of Being stem from the affects that humans experience, and compares Niasse's and Heidegger's treatment of similar affects such as dismay, vengeance, being with someone other than oneself, and the passing of slow and long time.

Whilst previous studies on the relations between Heidegger and the Islamicate worlds have done so from a historical perspective or from a way of thinking that wildly hybridizes both philosophies, Valentini particularly highlights their analogies and differences. Each chapter begins with Niasse's Qur'anic commentary, in which each prophet is associated with a singular affective mood that Niasse uncovers, then turning to Heidegger for his treatment of this same affect in its relation to Being/Beying.

Through an insightful and interesting comparison of modern Sufi and Heideggerian thought, Valentini explores how these two figures observe affects according to two guiding ideas that preside over all their meditations on Being. For Niasse, it is the Muhammadan Form that transcends the opposition between Being and Non-Being. For the Heidegger of the Kehre, it is the Void/Emptiness in which men find the philosophical disposition to make the earth habitable. Valentini overall leads us to ponder the question, what should be the guiding idea of our affects?

Arvustused

Philipp Valentini has developed a dynamic approach to the study of two key intellectual figures, one that allows for an alternative path to the understanding of "Being" current, especially in the "West". Islamic philosophy considers existence to be conceptually indefinable. In modern times, however, both "Western" and "Islamic" intellectuals tend to reduce everything to the single question, 'What is Being? As if "Being" could be an object in itself. Niasse and Heidegger taught against this typically modern foible. Whether or not their teachings offer a viable alternative to such reductionism is, of course, for progeny to decide. * Anthony F. Shaker, a scholar of Islamicate intellectual history and German thought, has authored Reintroducing Philosophy: Thinking as the Gathering of Civilization (2020) and Modernity, Civilization and the Return to History (2017). He has also translated Sadr al-Din Qunawi's I'jaz al-bayan (2025), with a new Arabic edition (2025), and four books from Ghazali I?ya? al-?ulum (2013-25), and has published numerous papers. * A highly successful meditation on resonances across cultures from the likes of Heidegger and Niasse. Both dense and lucid, one is never lost in this lyrical discussion, but rather heartened by the glimpses of new light that occur on every page. * Todd Lawson, Associate Professor Emeritus of Islamic Thought, University of Toronto, Canada *

Muu info

An insightful comparison of Ibrahim Niasses and Heideggers philosophies that illustrate the interesting similarities and differences between their affective ontologies.
Introduction
1. Adam's Confusion
2. Ibrahim and the Plant-human Tonality
3. Solomon and the Tonality of Being-with-another-than-self
4. Moses and the Labour of Learning to Endure the Long Passing of Time
5. Jesus and the Tone of Vengeance
6. Muhammad's Multiple Paternal Tones: The Keystone of Niasse's
Soteriological Thinking
7. The Decision Prior to Any Decision in Heidegger and Niasse. Making
the Earth Habitable' vs 'Circling the Muhammadan Election'.
Philipp Valentini earned his PhD at the university of Fribourg, Switzerland (2020). His research focuses on intercultural philosophical investigation of Being and its relation to the body, as well as comparing the West African and Maghrebi Philosophical Sufi tradition with the continental European philosophical canon.