Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Agency and Partnership Law [Kõva köide]

Edited by , Edited by
Teised raamatud teemal:
Agency and Partnership LawSuurem pilt
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9781786435118.html
Märksõnad:
This magisterial three-volume set presents the leading academic articles on agency law and partnership law, both classic and contemporary, serving as a valuable research tool for scholars and practitioners. The collection begins by focusing on topics such as the fundamental concepts of agency law, the fiduciary duties of agents, indemnification, vicarious liability and notice. It moves on to discussion of several important issues relating to partnership law, such as statutory development and reform, the entity-aggregate debate and single-person partnership. Together with an original introduction by the editors, this collection provides a comprehensive overview of the most significant matters in the fields of agency and partnership law.

Arvustused

Mark Loewenstein and Robert Hillman, who are themselves highly knowledgeable and widely respected scholars of agency and partnership law, have done a great service by assembling a collection of leading articles by giants of the field. Many of these articles were game changers, shifting the law in important ways. All of them reward close reading by anyone seeking to build their knowledge of this important area of the law.

Acknowledgements ix
Introduction xi
Mark J. Loewenstein
Robert W. Hillman
AGENCY
PART I FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS
1 `Agency', Harvard Law Review, IV (8), March, 345-64
5(20)
O. W. Holmes, Jr.
2 `Agency II', Harvard Law Review, V(1), April, 1-23
25(23)
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
3 `Responsibility for Tortious Acts: Its History', Harvard Law Review, VII (6), January, 315-37
48(23)
John H. Wigmore
4 `Responsibility for Tortious Acts: Its History - II: Harm Done by Servants and other Agents: 1300-1850', Harvard Law Review, VII (7), February, 383-105
71(26)
John H. Wigmore
PART II THE AGENCY RELATIONSHIP IN IMPORTANT CONTEXTS
5 `Lender Liability: The Dilemma of the Controlling Creditor', Tennessee Law Review, 58, 635-68
97(34)
J. Dennis Hynes
6 `Recalling why Corporate Officers are Fiduciaries', William and Mary Law Review, 46(5), 1597-653
131(57)
Lyman P. Q. Johnson
David Millon
7 `Client Responsibility for Lawyer Conduct: Examining the Agency Nature of the Lawyer-Client Relationship', Nebraska Law Review, 86 (2), 346-95
188(50)
Grace M. Giesel
8 `Agency Law Inside the Corporation: Problems of Candor and Knowledge', University of Cincinnati Law Review, 71, 1187-231
238(45)
Donald C. Langevoort
9 `The Securities Analyst as Agent: Rethinking the Regulation of Analysts', Iowa Law Review, 88, 1035-98
283(64)
Jill E. Fisch
Hillary A. Sale
10 `Contracting with Electronic Agents', Emory Law Journal, 50, 1047-92
347(48)
Anthony J. Bellia Jr.
PART III THE AGENT'S FIDUCIARY DUTIES
11 `The Fiduciary Principle', California Law Review, 37 (4), December, 539-55
395(17)
Austin W. Scott
12 `The Fiduciary Relationship: Its Economic Character and Legal Consequences', New York University Law Review, 66, October, 1045-75
412(31)
Robert Cooter
Bradley J. Freedman
13 `Beyond Metaphor: An Analysis of Fiduciary Obligation', Duke Law Journal, 1988, 879-924
443(46)
Deborah A. DeMot
14 `Fiduciary Law', California Law Review, 71 (3), May, 795-836
489(42)
Tamar Frankel
15 `The Fiduciary Character of Agency and the Interpretation of Instructions', in Andrew S. Gold and Paul B. Miller (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Fiduciary Law, Part IV,
Chapter 16, New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 321-38
531(20)
Deborah A. DeMott
PART IV INDEMNIFICATION
16 `The Employer's "Indemnity" Action', University of Chicago Law Review, 25 (3), Spring, 465-94
551(30)
Roscoe Steffen
17 `Vicarious Liability and the Master's Indemnity', Modern Law Review, 20, May, 220-35
581(16)
Glanville Williams
18 `Vicarious Liability and the Master's Indemnity, Continued', Modern Law Review, 20 (5), September, 437-46
597(12)
Glanville Williams
PART V VICARIOUS LIABILITY
19 `The Hidden and Fundamental Issue of Employer Vicarious Liability', Southern California Law Review, 69, 1739-67
609(29)
Gary T. Schwartz
20 `The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines', Harvard Law Review, 101 (3), January, 563-609
638(47)
Alan O. Sykes
21 `Employer Liability for Sexual Harassment: The Buck Stops Where?', Wake Forest Law Review, 34 (1), 1-25
685(28)
B. Glenn George
PART VI UNDISCLOSED PRINCIPAL DOCTRINE
22 `The Liability of an Undisclosed Principal V, Harvard Law Review, 23 (7), May, 513-30
713(18)
Floyd R. Mechem
23 `The Liability of an Undisclosed Principal II', Harvard Law Review, 23 (8), June, 590-602
731(13)
Floyd R. Mechem
24 `Undisclosed Principal - His Rights and Liabilities', Yale Law Journal, XVIII (7), May, 443-53
744(11)
James Barr Ames
25 `A Reexamination of the Agency Doctrine of Election', University of Miami Law Review, 36(3), 411-37
755(27)
Mark A. Sargent
Arnold Rochvar
26 `Squaring Undisclosed Agency Law with Contract Theory', California Law Review, 75 (6), December, 1969-2003
782(37)
Randy E. Barnett
PART VII NOTICE, KNOWLEDGE AND IMPUTATION
27 `Notice through an Agent', University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 65 (1), November, 1-38
819(38)
Warren A. Seavey
28 `Unforgettable Knowledge: A Study in the Law of Notice', Michigan Law Review, 34, 474-93
857(20)
Maurice H. Merrill
29 `Imputation, the Adverse Interest Exception, and the Curious Case of the Restatement (Third) of Agency', University of Colorado Law Review, 84 (2), 305-66
877
Mark J. Loewenstein
Acknowledgements ix
Introduction An introduction to all three volumes by the editors appears in Volume I
AGENCY
PART VIII AGENCY COST THEORY
1 `Governing through Intermediaries', Virginia Law Review, Symposium: The Law and Economics of Elections, 85 (8), November, 1627-70
5(44)
Samuel Issacharoff
Daniel R. Ortiz
2 `Fraudulent Conveyances, Agency Costs, and Leveraged Buyouts', Journal of Legal Studies, XX (1), January, 1-24
49(26)
Douglas G. Baird
PART IX AN AGENT'S AUTHORITY
3 `The Proposed Abolition of Inherent Agency Authority by the Restatement (Third) of Agency: An Incomplete Solution', Santa Clara Law Review, 45 (2), 337-82
75(46)
Gregory Scott Crespi
4 `The Contours and Composition of Agency Doctrine: Perspectives from History and Theory on Inherent Agency Power', University of Illinois Law Review, 2014 (5), 1813-33
121(24)
Deborah A. DeMott
PART X ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
5 `Agency Law and Contract Formation', American Law and Economics Review, 6 (2), Fall, 369-409
145(41)
Eric Rasmusen
6 `An Economic Analysis of the Choice Between Enterprise and Personal Liability for Accidents', California Law Review, 70 (6), December, 1345-92
186(51)
Lewis A. Kornhauser
PART XI INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS
7 `Navigating the Uber Economy', University of California, Davis Law Review, 49 (4), April, 1511-46
237(36)
Benjamin Means
Joseph A. Seiner
8 `Independent Contractor and the Good Life', University of Chicago Law Review, 2 (4), June, 501-32
273(36)
Roscoe T. Steffe
PARTNERSHIP
PART I STATUTORY DEVELOPMENT AND REFORM: THE UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACTS (UPA AND RUPA)
9 `The Uniform Partnership Act', Yale Law Journal, XXIV (8), June, 617-41
309(25)
William Draper Lewis
10 `The Uniform Partnership Act: A Criticism', Harvard Law Review, 28 (8), June, 762-89
334(28)
Judson A. Crane
11 `The Uniform Partnership Act -- A Reply to Mr. Crane's Criticism', Harvard Law Review, 29 (2), December, 158-92
362(35)
William Draper Lewis
12 `The Revised Uniform Partnership Act: The Reporters' Overview', Business Lawyer, 49 (1), November, 1-44
397(44)
Donald J. Weidner
John W. Larson
13 `The Revised Uniform Partnership Act: Not Ready for Prime Time', Business Lawyer, 49 (1), November, 45-82
441(40)
Larry E. Ribstein
PART II THE ENTITY--AGGREGATE DEBATE
14 `The Entity-Aggregate Dispute: Conceptualism and Functionalism in Partnership Law', Arkansas Law Review, 42, 395-466
481(74)
Gary S. Rosin
PART III SINGLE PERSON PARTNERSHIP
15 `Partners without Partners: The Legal Status of Single Person Partnerships', Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, XVII (2), 449-73
555(28)
Robert W. Hillman
Donald J. Weidner
PART IV RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PARTNERS: CONTRACTS AND FIDUCIARY STATUS
16 `Fundamental Contractarian Error in the Revised Uniform Partnership Act of 1992', Boston University Law Review, 73 (4), September, 523-79
583(57)
Allan W. Vestal
17 `Freedom of Contract, Fiduciary Duties, and Partnerships: The Bargain Principle and the Law of Agency', Washington and Lee Law Review, 54 (2), 439-64
640(26)
J. Dennis Hynes
18 `Private Ordering Within Partnerships', University of Miami Law Review, 41 (3), January, 425-71
666(47)
Robert W. Hillman
19 `Are Partners Fiduciaries?', University of Illinois Law Review, 2005 (1), 209-51
713(43)
Larry E. Ribstein
20 `Is it Appropriate to Appropriate Corporate Concepts: Fiduciary Duties and the Revised Uniform Partnership Act', University of Colorado Law Review, 64, 111-57
756(47)
Claire Moore Dickerson
21 `The Use of Covenants: An Empirical Analysis of Venture Partnership Agreements', Journal of Law and Economics, XXXIX (2), October, 463-98
803(36)
Paul Gompers
Josh Lerner
22 `Bumping Along the Bottom: Abandoned Principles and Failed Fiduciary Standards in Uniform Partnership and LLC Statutes', Kentucky Law Journal, 96(2), 163-95
839(33)
Rutheford B. Campbell
23 `Blind Men and Elephants: Fiduciary Duties under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act, Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, and Beyond', Journal of Small and Emerging Business Law, 1 (1), Spring, 109-64
872(56)
J. William Callison
24 `Judicial Scrutiny of Fiduciary Duties in Delaware Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies', Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 32 (1), 1-32
928
Myron T. Steele
Acknowledgements vii
Introduction An introduction to all three volumes by the editors appears in Volume I
PARTNERSHIP
PART V PARTNERSHIP PROPERTY
1 `Partnership Property and Partnership Authority Under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act', Business Lawyer, 49(1), November, 83-105
5(26)
Edward S. Merrill
PART VI LIMITED LIABILITY
2 `The "Control" Test for Limited Partnerships', Harvard Law Review, 82 (7), May, 1471-84
31(14)
Alan L. Feld
3 `The Deregulation of Limited Liability and the Death of Partnership', Washington University Law Quarterly: Symposium on Corporate Law and Finance, 70 (2), January, 417-75
45(59)
Larry E. Ribstein
4 `Limited Liability and Externalization of Risk: A Comment on the Death of Partnership', Washington University Law Quarterly: Symposium on Corporate Law and Finance, 70 (2), January, 477-87
104(11)
Robert W. Hillman
5 `Limited Liability Partnerships: The Next Step in the Evolution of the Unincorporated Business Organization', Business Lawyer, 51 (1), November, 147-207
115(61)
Robert R. Keatinge
Allan G. Donn
George W. Coleman
Elizabeth G. Hester
6 `Registered Limited Liability Partnerships: Present at the Birth (Nearly)', University of Colorado Law Review, 66, 1065-103
176(41)
Robert W. Hamilton
PART VII DISSOLUTION AND BANKRUPTCY
7 `Partnership Dissolution -- Causes, Consequences, and Cures', Texas Law Review, 43, 631-68
217(38)
Alan R. Bromberg
8 `The Limited Liability Partnership in Bankruptcy', American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 89 (4), Fall, 567-606
255(42)
Christine Hurt
PART VIII THE CHANGING NATURE OF PARTNERSHIP
9 `Law, Culture, and the Lore of Partnership: Of Entrepreneurs, Accountability, and the Evolving Status of Partners', Wake Forest Law Review, 40 (3), Fall, 793-825
297(36)
Robert W. Hillman
PART IX PARTNERSHIP LAW AND THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRM
10 `Golden Handcuffs: Enforceability of Non-Competition Clauses in Professional Partnership Agreements of Accountants, Physicians, and Attorneys', American Business Law Journal, 31 (1), May, 31-58
333(28)
Serena L. Kafker
11 `Sharing Among the Human Capitalists: An Economic Inquiry into the Corporate Law Firm and How Partners Split Profits', Stanford Law Review: Symposium on the Law Firm as a Social Institution, 37 (2), January, 313-92
361(80)
Ronald J. Gilson
Robert H. Mnookin
12 `Law Firms and Their Partners: The Law and Ethics of Grabbing and Leaving', Texas Law Review, 67 (1), November, 1-61
441(61)
Robert W. Hillman
13 `Limited Liability for Lawyers: General Partners Need Not Apply', Business Lawyer, 51 (1), November, 85-145
502(61)
Jennifer J. Johnson
14 `Professional Responsibility and Liability Issues Related to Limited Liability Law Partnerships', South Texas Law Review, 39 (2), 399-444
563(46)
Susan Saab Fortney
15 `The Partnership Paradigm and Law Firm Non-equity Partners', Kansas Law Review, 58 (3), 507-51
609
Douglas R. Richmond
Edited by Mark J. Loewenstein, Monfort Professor of Law, University of Colorado, Boulder,Law School and Robert W. Hillman, Distinguished FBP Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, US