|
List of figures and tables |
|
|
xix | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xxi | |
Foreword |
|
xxiii | |
Author profile |
|
xxv | |
|
|
xxvii | |
|
|
xxxi | |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Part 1: The engineer and the contract |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
1.3 Part 2: The project and the contract |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
1.4 Part 3: Avoidance and resolution of disputes |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.5 Part 4: Forensic engineers and expert witnesses |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.6 Part 5: International construction contracts |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
Part I The engineer and the contract |
|
|
|
Chapter 2 The Evolution Of The Role Of The Engineer |
|
|
11 | (12) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2.3 What is the role of the engineer? |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
2.6 The engineer's historical role |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
2.7 The Engineer as agent of the Employer |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.8 Modern contractual provisions on the Engineer |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.9 The decline of the engineer's role |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
2.10 Long live the engineer! |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Chapter 3 Time, Cost And Quality -- The Engineer's Eternal Challenge |
|
|
23 | (10) |
|
3.1 Time, cost and quality |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
3.1.4 Historical perspective |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
3.2 Tension in contracting parties' expectations |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
3.3 Graphical representations |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
3.7 Disputes arise from unfulfilled expectations |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Chapter 4 Risk And Construction Contracts |
|
|
33 | (12) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
4.2 The contract and expectations |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
4.3 Objectives and expectations |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
4.4 Contractual success and failure |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
4.6 The relationship between contract "success" and risk |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
4.11 The choice of contract type |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
4.12 Risk and contract forms |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Chapter 5 Managing Design Risk |
|
|
45 | (12) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
5.2.1 Intellectual property |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 The influence of design on a facility |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 The 1:10:100 "rule" |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
5.3 Who carries out design? |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
5.4 What are the design risks? |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
5.4.8 FIDIC-identified risks |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
5.5 Who should bear the design risks? |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
5.6 Managing design risk by the employer |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
5.6.1 Design interface with construction |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
5.6.2 Designer's contract |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
5.7 Managing design risk by the designer |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Chapter 6 Contracts For Design Services |
|
|
57 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
6.2 Procurement of design |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
6.3 Contract terms and conditions addressing risk transference |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
6.3.1 Responsibility for delays -- liquidated damages |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Responsibility for design data |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Generally inappropriate contract clauses: destruction of confidential information |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
Chapter 7 Design Life Or Service Life: What Is The Difference? |
|
|
63 | (16) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
7.2 Design of constructed facilities |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
7.3 The art and science of engineering |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
7.10 A case study on design life and service life |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
Chapter 8 Fit For Purpose Or Due Skill And Care? |
|
|
79 | (8) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
8.2 Technology and Construction Court |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
8.4.1 No inconsistency between a lifetime of 20 years and complying with J101 |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
8.4.2 Design life and service life |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
8.4.3 Satisfying J101 was a minimum requirement |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Chapter 9 Design And Construct Contracts And Final Design Cost Risk |
|
|
87 | (14) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
9.2 Design and construct contracts |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Final design cost risk |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
9.3 Potential factors in final design cost risk |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
9.4.1 Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd v Kinhill Engineers Pty Ltd |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 John Holland Construction & Engineering Pty Ltd v Kvaerner RJ Brown Pty Ltd |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (4) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
9.6.2 Tender design subcontract terms |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
9.6.3 Fitness for purpose |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
9.6.4 Explicit subcontract term for fitness for purpose |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
9.6.5 Summary for tender design subcontract |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
9.7.2 Final design subcontract terms |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
9.7.3 Summary for final design subcontract |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
9.8 Possible mechanisms for a contractor to minimise final design cost risk |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Chapter 10 The Duty Of Care In Design -- Can Engineers Rely On Codes Of Practice? |
|
|
101 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
10.2 Codes of practice and standards |
|
|
101 | (4) |
|
10.2.1 What is a standard? |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
10.2.2 Process for issue of an Australian standard |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
10.2.3 Interested parties |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
10.2.4 Outcome of standard development process |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
10.3 Statutory significance of codes and standards |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
10.4 Contractual significance of codes and standards |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
10.5 Duty of care in design |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
10.5.2 Statutory modification of the common law |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
10.6 Is there an obligation for an engineer to comply with a code or standard? |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
10.7 Is compliance with a code or standard sufficient? |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
10.8.1 BHP Coal Pty Ltd v O & K Orenstein & Koppel AG |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
10.8.2 Comments on practical design engineering aspects of judgment |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
Part II The project and the contract |
|
|
|
Chapter 11 The Importance Of Standard Form Contracts |
|
|
117 | (8) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
11.2 Appropriate contract terms |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
11.3 Standard contract forms and "bespoke" contracts |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
11.3.1 Standard form contracts |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 Standard contract forms with modifications |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
11.4 Advantages of standard form contracts |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (3) |
|
Chapter 12 Challenges In Achieving Successful Megaproj Ects |
|
|
125 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
12.2 Project success and failure |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
12.4 International research |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
12.5 What can be done to improve megaproject outcomes? |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
Chapter 13 Managing Time, Cost And Quality -- A Tale Of Two Buildings |
|
|
133 | (14) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
13.2 Similarities in delivery of APH and SPH |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
13.3 Australian Parliament House |
|
|
134 | (5) |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
13.3.2 Project performance |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
13.3.3 Contributing factors to project performance |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
13.4 New Scottish Parliament House |
|
|
139 | (6) |
|
13.4.1 Contributing factors to project performance |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
Chapter 14 A Tale Of Two Bridges: Issues Arising From Design And Construct Contracts |
|
|
147 | (18) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
14.2 Sydney Harbour Bridge |
|
|
147 | (12) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
14.2.2 The 1923 invitation to tender |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
14.2.3 Tender specification |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
14.2.5 Dorman long's tender design |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
14.2.6 Final design cost risk |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
14.2.9 The design controversy |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
14.3 Kings Bridge, Melbourne Australia (1962) |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
14.3.4 Criticisms of design and construct contract |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
14.3.5 Failure of the bridge |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
Chapter 15 Sta Te Of Tasmania V Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd |
|
|
165 | (14) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
15.2 Early history of the bypass project |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
15.5 Scope of works and technical requirements |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
15.6 Value management workshop |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
15.7 The 15% design and its review |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
15.8 The 85% design and its review |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
15.9 Final design submissions |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
15.10 Landowner's complaint about road level |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
15.11 Road design as directed |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
15.12 Was the Contractor's in-fill design compliant? |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
15.13 Consequences of noncompliance |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
15.15 The independence of the Principal's Representative |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (3) |
|
Chapter 16 The Canterbury Earthquakes I |
|
|
179 | (6) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
16.2 The Royal Commission Report |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
16.3 Expert evidence in the Royal Commission |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
16.4 Legal and statutory requirements |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
16.5 Design standards and risk |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Chapter 17 The Canterbury Earthquakes II |
|
|
185 | (6) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
17.2 Details of the Royal Commission Report |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
17.4 Earthquake loads on buildings |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
17.5 Safety assessments of buildings after the earthquakes |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
17.7 Assessment of existing buildings to modern standards |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
Chapter 18 Construction Failures: Have We Learned The Lessons Of History? |
|
|
191 | (16) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
18.2 The value of studying construction failures |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
18.3 Sources of information on construction failures |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
18.4 Public inquiries and Royal Commissions into failures |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
18.5 Failures contributed to by inadequate engineering knowledge |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
18.6 Monitoring of constructed facilities |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
18.7.1 Design, construction and testing |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
18.7.2 Inquiry into crash |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
18.8 Ronan Point apartments, London UK (1968) |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
18.8.1 The failure and the inquiry |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
18.8.2 Progressive collapse |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
18.9 Hartford Civic Centre, Connecticut USA (1978) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
18.10 Hyatt Regency Hotel Walkways, Kansas City USA (1981) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
18.11 L'Ambience Plaza, Connecticut USA (1987) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
18.12 Burnaby Supermarket Parking Deck, British Colombia Canada (1988) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
18.13 De la Concorde Overpass, Quebec Canada (2006) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
Chapter 19 Lessons From Failures -- Quebec Bridge |
|
|
207 | (10) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
19.2 Procurement of the Quebec Bridge Canada |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
19.3 Criticism of design and construct procurement |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
19.8 The Commission's conclusions |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
19.9 Lessons from Quebec Bridge |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
Chapter 20 Lessons From Failures -- West Gate Bridge |
|
|
217 | (12) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
20.2 West Gate Bridge, Melbourne Australia (1971) |
|
|
217 | (5) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
20.2.2 Construction contracts for West Gate Bridge |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
20.2.3 Cost and time issues |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
20.3 Milford Haven Bridge, Wales UK (1970) |
|
|
222 | (2) |
|
20.3.1 Committee of Inquiry |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
20.3.2 Contractual recommendations |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
20.4 Amendments to ICE Conditions of Contract |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
20.5 Engineer's and Contractor's responsibilities |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
20.7 Lessons from West Gate Bridge |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
Part III Avoidance and resolution of disputes |
|
|
|
Chapter 21 The Avoidance Of Disputes By Contractors In Design And Construct Contracts |
|
|
229 | (12) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
21.2 Preparation of tender |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
21.5 Contractual provisions for dispute resolution |
|
|
234 | (2) |
|
21.6 Contract negotiations |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
21.8 Management of project execution |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
21.9 Resolution of disputes |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
239 | (2) |
|
Chapter 22 Cost-Effective Resolution Of Construction Disputes |
|
|
241 | (8) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
22.3 Expert determination |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
22.5 The features of evaluative methods of ADR |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
22.6 Advantages of evaluative methods of ADR over litigation or arbitration |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
22.7 The types of disputes most suited to evaluative methods of ADR |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
22.8 How a Dispute Board assists parties in avoiding disputes |
|
|
246 | (3) |
|
Chapter 23 Dispute Boards And Construction Contracts |
|
|
249 | (10) |
|
23.1 What is a Dispute Board? |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
23.2 Contractual requirements |
|
|
250 | (5) |
|
23.2.1 Standard form contracts with a DB clause |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
23.2.2 Standard contract clauses for a DB |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
23.2.3 Procedural rules and operation of a DB |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
23.2.5 Dispute resolution |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
23.2.6 Standard procedural rules |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
23.2.7 Tripartite agreements for a DB |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
23.3 Cost of Dispute Boards |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
23.4 Dispute Boards in Australia |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
23.6 Reasons for the high success rate of DBs |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
Chapter 24 The Commercial Value Of Dispute Boards Under Fidic Contracts |
|
|
259 | (12) |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
24.2 Dispute Boards under FIDIC contracts |
|
|
260 | (2) |
|
24.3 Is a Dispute Board decision a pre-requisite to referring a dispute to arbitration? |
|
|
262 | (2) |
|
24.3.1 Relevant provisions in the FIDIC contracts |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
24.4 A Dispute Board decision is (provisionally) binding |
|
|
264 | (5) |
|
24.4.1 Relevant provisions in the FIDIC contracts |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
24.4.2 PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK (PGN) and CRW joint operation (CRW) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
24.4.5 2010 Singapore High Court |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
24.4.6 2011 Singapore Court of Appeal |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
24.4.8 2013 Singapore High Court |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
24.4.9 2015 Singapore Court of Appeal |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
24.4.10 Conclusions on enforcing a provisionally binding DAB decision |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
24.5 Costs of Dispute Boards |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
Chapter 25 The "Best" Method Of Resolution Of Construction Disputes -- Elusive Or Illusory? |
|
|
271 | (14) |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
25.2 Categories and methods of DR |
|
|
272 | (2) |
|
25.3 Hierarchy of DR categories |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
25.4 The proportionality between time, cost and quality |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
25.5 Significant features of DR methods appropriate to construction disputes |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
25.7 When should DR methods be selected? |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
25.8 "Final and binding" determination |
|
|
279 | (2) |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
Part IV Forensic engineers and expert witnesses |
|
|
|
Chapter 26 The Engagement Of Forensic Engineers |
|
|
285 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
26.2 What is forensic engineering? |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
26.3 "Clean" and "dirty" experts |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
26.4 Selecting the most appropriate forensic engineer |
|
|
286 | (4) |
|
26.4.1 Defining the scope |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
26.4.2 Engineers and forensic engineers |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
26.4.3 Quality management of engineering |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
26.4.4 Matching scope with required expertise |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
26.4.5 Where does one find experts? |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
26.4.6 Time, cost or quality of services? |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
26.5 Briefing a forensic engineer |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
26.5.1 Who should formally engage the forensic engineer? |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
26.5.2 Technical briefing of a forensic engineer |
|
|
291 | (1) |
|
26.5.3 The forensic engineer's brief |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
26.6 Managing a forensic engineer's brief |
|
|
293 | (2) |
|
|
293 | (2) |
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
Chapter 27 Guidelines For Experts |
|
|
297 | (10) |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
27.3 Expert reports for the purposes of litigation |
|
|
298 | (3) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
27.3.2 The expert's opinion |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
27.3.3 Expert's interface with lawyers |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
27.3.4 Expert's files and documents |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
27.3.5 Factual and opinion evidence |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
27.3.6 Contents of expert report |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
27.3.7 Expert's report in reply |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
27.4 Expert reports for the purposes of arbitration |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
27.5 Expert's obligations and duties in relation to a hearing |
|
|
301 | (4) |
|
27.5.1 Experts' conferences |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
27.5.2 Preparations prior to a hearing |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
27.5.4 The nature of evidence in a hearing |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
27.5.5 Expert evidence in a "hot tub" |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
27.6 Expert evidence in fast track arbitration |
|
|
305 | (2) |
|
Chapter 28 Getting The Most Out Of Expert Witnesses |
|
|
307 | (24) |
|
28.1 When to brief an expert |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
28.2 Ethical considerations |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
28.3 Dealing with adverse opinions |
|
|
309 | (2) |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
28.5 How lawyers can work effectively with experts |
|
|
312 | (2) |
|
28.6 Expert conferences and conclaves -- Matthews v SPI Electricity |
|
|
314 | (17) |
|
28.6.1 Steps in the production and exchange of expert evidence |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
28.6.2 Limits to the application of Order 44 to opinion evidence |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
28.6.3 Composition and conduct of expert conclaves |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
28.6.4 Use of assessor v special referee |
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
28.6.5 Evidence of state of knowledge of relevant industry |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
28.6.6 Supplementary expert report after expert conclaves |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
28.6.7 Engagement of expert to carry out further testing |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
28.6.8 Admissibility of expert evidence |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
28.6.9 Tender of documents provided to experts |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
28.6.10 Scope of assessors' role |
|
|
322 | (2) |
|
28.6.11 Use of a model to assist the court |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
28.6.12 Exclusion of cross-examination under's 42 Evidence Act |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
28.6.13 Further supplementary reports to address lay evidence at trial |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
28.6.14 Striking out of expert evidence |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
28.6.15 Further expert evidence late in the trial |
|
|
327 | (4) |
|
Chapter 29 The Rules For Expert Evidence In Australia |
|
|
331 | (16) |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
29.2 Expert evidence rules in Australian jurisdictions |
|
|
331 | (2) |
|
29.3 Details of specific provisions |
|
|
333 | (5) |
|
29.3.1 General issues in relation to the rules for expert evidence |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
29.3.2 Overarching obligations of an expert witness |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
29.3.3 Procedural requirements for expert reports |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
29.3.4 Required content of an expert report |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
29.3.5 Procedural rules for expert conferences |
|
|
336 | (1) |
|
29.3.6 Procedural rules for giving evidence in court |
|
|
336 | (1) |
|
29.3.7 Procedures for court-appointed expert or jointly appointed single expert |
|
|
337 | (1) |
|
|
337 | (1) |
|
29.3.9 Consequences of noncompliance |
|
|
337 | (1) |
|
29.4 Recommendations on contents of an expert report |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
29.5 Table of rules of expert evidence in Australian Supreme Courts |
|
|
339 | (8) |
|
Part V International construction contracts |
|
|
|
Chapter 30 "A Common Law Of Construction Contracts" -- Or Vive La Difference? |
|
|
347 | (10) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
30.5 Common law and civil law |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
30.6 Mandatory and non-mandatory laws |
|
|
350 | (2) |
|
30.7 Statutory constraints on freedom of contract |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
30.8 Proper law of the contract |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
|
353 | (2) |
|
30.10 FIDIC contracts -- an application of international construction law |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
|
355 | (2) |
|
Chapter 31 The Use Of The Unidroit Principles In International Construction Contracts |
|
|
357 | (16) |
|
|
357 | (2) |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
31.3 The application of the UP to international construction contracts |
|
|
360 | (2) |
|
31.4 Case law referring to the UP |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
31.6 UP as support for the common law |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
31.7 UP articles incompatible with common law |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
31.8 Arbitration cases referring to the UP |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
31.9 UP applied as the law governing the substance of the dispute |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
31.10 Reference to UP as evidence of international trade usages |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
31.11 Reference to UP as corroboration for a conclusion arrived at by reference to national law, or consistent with national law |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
31.12 UP referred to as supplementary' to national law |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
31.13 Parties to an arbitration agreed to use general principles of international law, as complementary and supplementary to the choice of national law |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
31.14 To what extent do the UP cover construction law? |
|
|
369 | (2) |
|
|
371 | (2) |
|
Chapter 32 Final Comments |
|
|
373 | (8) |
|
32.1 The construction industry |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
32.2 Construction contracts |
|
|
374 | (2) |
|
32.3 Successful construction projects |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
377 | (4) |
Glossary |
|
381 | (12) |
Index |
|
393 | |