Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Architecture of Determiners [Kõva köide]

(Assistant Professor, Universite du Quebec a Montreal)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 240 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 160x239x18 mm, kaal: 442 g
  • Sari: Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax
  • Ilmumisaeg: 15-Jan-2015
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0199945233
  • ISBN-13: 9780199945238
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Hardback, 240 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 160x239x18 mm, kaal: 442 g
  • Sari: Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax
  • Ilmumisaeg: 15-Jan-2015
  • Kirjastus: Oxford University Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0199945233
  • ISBN-13: 9780199945238
Teised raamatud teemal:
Work in morphology is typically concerned with productive word formation and regular inflection, in any event with open class categories such as verbs, nouns, and adjectives, and their various forms. The Architecture of Determiners, by contrast, is devoted to a set of function words: the closed class of determiners. While it is traditionally assumed that function words are syntactically atomic, Thomas Leu shows that a comparative perspective on a series of determiners - each insistently vivisected into its minimal morphotactic segments - reveals an anatomy with properties analogous to clausal syntax, including a lexical, an inflectional, and left peripheral layer, as well as transformational relations among subconstituents. Leu argues that determiners are extended adjectival projections with a closed class minimal stem.

Leu focuses on Swiss German and German, using other Germanic and non-Germanic languages as a comparative domain. His discussion of the internal structure of determiners includes demonstratives (ch.2), distributive quantifiers (ch.4), possessive and negative determiners (ch.5), and interrogative determiners such as 'was f r' (ch.6). His main claim - that all of these involve extended adjectival projections - connects naturally to a discussion of adjectival / determiner inflection in German. Chapter 3 addresses the oft-debated strong versus weak agreement alternation in a novel way, proposing that the adjective moves within its own extended projection, in a way akin to verb movement to C in the clause. This accounts for the central facts of nominative and accusative inflection. Chapter 7, then, addresses dative and genitive morphology, setting them syntactically apart from adjectival / determiner inflection in a way that leads to a surprising account of most of the systematic (meta-) syncretism patterns in German adjectival inflection.
Preface xi
Acknowledgments xiii
1 Introduction
1(10)
1.1 Determiners-A Set Of Closed Class Adjectives
1(1)
1.2 Movement Rather Than Declension Classes And Syncretism
2(1)
1.3 The Descriptive Domain
3(1)
1.4 Syntax Inside Function Words: The Gist
4(2)
1.5 Building On Traditional Ideas
6(5)
Part One D-TERMINERS
2 Definite Demonstratives
11(29)
2.1 Proposal
12(1)
2.2 A Silent Deictic Adjective
12(6)
2.2.1 German: The Basic Issue
12(1)
2.2.2 Scandinavian
13(2)
2.2.3 Swiss German
15(1)
2.2.4 Colloquial Slovenian
16(2)
2.3 (Non-)Silent Here/There And Other
18(10)
2.3.1 Scandinavian den her
18(1)
2.3.2 Afrikaans hier-die
19(1)
2.3.3 Swiss German ana
20(2)
2.3.4 German dies-
22(1)
2.3.5 here/there Demonstratives Beyond Germanic
23(1)
2.3.6 Swiss German dis-
24(1)
2.3.7 Icelandic hinn
25(1)
2.3.8 Indefinite 'there'
26(2)
2.4 Demonstratives And Polydefiniteness
28(3)
2.4.1 Greek
29(1)
2.4.2 Colloquial Slovenian
29(1)
2.4.3 Mainland Scandinavian
30(1)
2.4.4 Proposal
31(1)
2.5 Adjectival Here/There And Reinforcer Here/There
31(4)
2.5.1 Licensing of Reinforcer and Demonstrative here/there
32(1)
2.5.2 Morphosyntax of Reinforcer and Demonstrative here/there
32(1)
2.5.3 Interpretation of Reinforcer and Demonstrative here/there
33(2)
2.6 Intermediate Conclusion
35(1)
2.7 Alternative Routes To Demonstrativity
35(4)
2.7.1 Swiss German (dd)sab
36(2)
2.7.2 Turkish
38(1)
2.8 Conclusion
39(1)
3 xAP
40(48)
3.1 Framing The Proposal
40(5)
3.1.1 Agreement Configurations and Morphological Models
40(1)
3.1.2 Distribution of Agreement
41(1)
3.1.3 Extending the Adjectival Projection
42(1)
3.1.4 The Proposal
43(2)
3.2 Definite xAPs
45(6)
3.2.1 Scandinavian "Double Definiteness"
46(2)
3.2.2 Greek Poly-("in)-Definiteness
48(3)
3.3 Adjectival Agreement AGRca
51(9)
3.3.1 Complementizer/Verb Agreement
51(1)
3.3.2 German Weak/Strong Adjectival Declension
52(4)
3.3.3 The Swiss German d/di Alternation
56(2)
3.3.4 Adjectival Agreement and V2 Movement
58(2)
3.4 Situating The Adjective In The DP
60(8)
3.4.1 Adjectives as Adjuncts
60(1)
3.4.2 Adjectives as Heads
61(2)
3.4.3 Adjectives as Specifiers
63(2)
3.4.4 Adjectives as Relative Clauses
65(2)
3.4.5 The Present Proposal
67(1)
3.5 Adjectives As (Reduced) Relatives
68(3)
3.5.1 Adjective-Noun Agreement
68(1)
3.5.2 Anaphora
68(2)
3.5.3 Thematic Links into Adjectival Stems
70(1)
3.6 Silent Articles And The Adjectives As Specifiers View
71(7)
3.6.1 Multiple Adjectives, Multiple Definite Markers, and Agrca
71(2)
3.6.2 Against a Doubly Filled COMP Approach to Nonpronunciation
73(5)
3.7 Relativization And Cartography
78(9)
3.7.1 Functional Structure in DP
79(1)
3.7.2 Multiple Adjectives
80(3)
3.7.3 Adjective Meanings and Derivations
83(4)
3.8 Conclusion
87(1)
4 Definite Quantifiers
88(27)
4.1 Proposal
89(1)
4.2 Jeder Is An xAP
89(4)
4.2.1 Jeder Has Adjectival Inflection
90(2)
4.2.2 Jeder Contains an Adjectival Article
92(1)
4.3 Beide Is An xAP
93(9)
4.3.1 The Scope Properties of beid-
94(3)
4.3.2 The Syntax of Determiner beid-
97(4)
4.3.3 Implications for jeder
101(1)
4.4 Je Takes A Bare-N(P) Restriction
102(3)
4.4.1 Je Words
102(2)
4.4.2 Implication for jeder
104(1)
4.5 Deriving Jeder---Step By Step
105(3)
4.6 Je-D-Er Beyond German
108(3)
4.7 Conclusion
111(4)
Part Two NON-D-DETERMINERS
5 Ein-Determiners
115(23)
5.1 Proposal
116(1)
5.2 Ein Is Ein
116(5)
5.2.1 What is the "Indefinite Article"?
116(4)
5.2.2 Ein and Numerals
120(1)
5.3 Negative k-Ein
121(5)
5.3.1 The Pre-k-element NI
121(1)
5.3.2 The Syntax of NI
122(4)
5.4 Possessive Determiners
126(10)
5.4.1 The Elements and Variants of Possessive Determiners
126(2)
5.4.2 The Syntax of POSS
128(8)
5.5 Conclusion
136(2)
6 Adj And Inv Variants Among Wh- and S-Determiners
138(31)
6.1 Was Fur A Determiner
138(19)
6.1.1 What for and Degree Fronting
139(2)
6.1.2 What for Elements and Structure
141(8)
6.1.3 The Syntax of what
149(6)
6.1.4 Was fur and em jeder
155(2)
6.2 The Adj And Inv Variants Of Welch And Solch
157(8)
6.2.1 Welch-
158(3)
6.2.2 Solch-
161(4)
6.2.3 Summary of -lch- Words
165(1)
6.3 Inv And Suffixal Morphology
165(2)
6.4 Conclusion
167(2)
7 Case and Syncretism
169(26)
7.1 Separating Case From Agreement
170(3)
7.2 The Syntax Of Dative Case
173(9)
7.2.1 Violation of "Parallel Inflection"
174(4)
7.2.2 The Swiss German Indefinite Article
178(2)
7.2.3 Possessive Pronouns/Determiners
180(1)
7.2.4 P-D Contraction
180(1)
7.2.5 Genitive -s
181(1)
7.3 The Form And The Syntax Of The Oblique Kase Marker Ok
182(6)
7.3.1 Syncretism via Underspecification
183(1)
7.3.2 Meta-syncretism via Impoverishment
184(1)
7.3.3 Meta-meta-syncretism: A Case for the Syntax
185(2)
7.3.4 A Possible Extension
187(1)
7.4 Datives And Genitives As Disguised Accusatives
188(5)
7.4.1 Datives as Possessed Accusatives
189(1)
7.4.2 Eliminating Oblique Case Syncretism in German
190(1)
7.4.3 (Un-)definiteness of Datives and Genitives
191(2)
7.5 Conclusion And Consequences
193(2)
8 Conclusion
195(4)
References 199(12)
Index 211
Thomas Leu is Professor of Linguistics at the Université du Québec à Montréal. He is a co-editor of An Annotated Syntax Reader: Lasting Insights and Questions (2013).