Acknowledgements |
|
v | |
Part 1* |
|
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
1.1 Care in the Community |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
1.2 Design for Domesticity |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
1.3 Mental health service users and their needs |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
1.4 Towards a Model for Rehabilitation |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.5 Structure of the Book and Presentation of Ideas |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
2 History of mental health and its expression in architecture |
|
|
11 | (22) |
|
2.1 The onset of psychiatry: from God-given medicine to the deep roots of Western psychiatry and "back" to the Great Confinement |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
2.2 From the ideals of the French Revolution to the asylums |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
2.3 The transition from the "second Age of Confinement" to social psychiatry |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
2.4 Social psychiatry and the return of the mentally ill into the community |
|
|
18 | (7) |
|
2.5 The rationalisation of mental health care under the managerial perspective and the involvement of social services |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
2.6 Community Care in the UK and France from the Eighties on |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
2.7 Key messages regarding Community Care |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
|
33 | (38) |
|
3.1 Opposing frameworks for the planning of mental health services |
|
|
34 | (25) |
|
3.1.1 Specialists' concepts |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Normalisation theory |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
3.1.3 Social exclusion in the community |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
3.1.4 From exclusion to social valorization |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3.1.5 What lies between the asylum and the misinterpretation of domesticity: the need for a new paradigm |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
3.1.6 Safety and security |
|
|
45 | (5) |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
3.1.8 Personalisation and choice |
|
|
53 | (6) |
|
3.2 The physical milieu of the psychiatric units |
|
|
59 | (8) |
|
3.2.1 The interface with the community: location, scale and external appearance |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Internal organisation of facilities |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
3.2.4 Decoration of facilities |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.2.8 Furniture and fittings |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.2.9 Dealing with tough budgets: small changes |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
|
71 | (8) |
|
4.1 The selection of cases |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
4.2 The SCP model': towards a critical scoping of the concept of Domesticity |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.3 The design of the user-centred questionnaires |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.4 The conduct of the fieldwork |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
4.5 The need for an architectural checklist |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
4.6 The detailed design of the Checklist |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
4.7 Advantages and limitations of the methodology |
|
|
78 | (1) |
Part 2* |
|
|
5 The physical milieu of research: the unit buildings |
|
|
79 | (52) |
|
|
79 | (5) |
|
5.2 Building descriptions |
|
|
84 | (14) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Francois Tosquelles |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
5.3 Qualitative Evaluation of Case Studies |
|
|
98 | (33) |
|
5.3.1 Safety and security |
|
|
98 | (4) |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
5.3.3 Personalisation and choice |
|
|
106 | (9) |
|
|
115 | (16) |
|
6 Architectural Checklist analysis |
|
|
131 | (14) |
|
6.1 Overall performance according to the checklist |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
6.1.1 The foyers'/wards' performance according to the checklist |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
6.1.2 The Context and Site features |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
6.1.3 The "Building" group of features |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
6.1.4 The Space and Room Group of features |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
6.2 Overall Frequencies of Institutional features |
|
|
134 | (11) |
|
7 The users' perspectives |
|
|
145 | (28) |
|
|
145 | (6) |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
7.1.2 General organisation of the building and building features mentioned by staff |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
7.1.3 Service users' concerns on safety related issues |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
7.1.4 Issues related to safety and security that could be connected to design implications |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
7.1.5 Staff and service user perspective on the safety and the security of the facilities |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
|
151 | (6) |
|
7.2.1 Staff views on service users' competence |
|
|
151 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Spatial organisation issues related to service users competence according to staff |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
7.2.3 Service users' concerns regarding competence |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
7.2.4 Spatial organisation issues related to service users competence according to service users |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
7.2.5 Main findings related to competence for staff and service users |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
7.3 Issues related to personalisation and choice |
|
|
157 | (16) |
|
7.3.1 Staff on issues regarding psychosocial aspects of care |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
7.3.2 Staff on personalisation and choice design features |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
7.3.3 Service users on personalisation and choice regime related issues |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
7.3.4 Service users on personalisation and choice issues that were relevant to the space of the foyers/wards |
|
|
164 | (4) |
|
7.3.5 Main findings on personalisation and choice |
|
|
168 | (5) |
|
|
173 | (16) |
|
8.1 The cross cultural comparison |
|
|
173 | (10) |
|
8.1.1 Safety and security |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
8.1.3 Personalisation and Choice |
|
|
179 | (4) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
8.3 The significance of architecture and design |
|
|
184 | (5) |
References |
|
189 | |