Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Research, Policy and Practice [Kõva köide]

Edited by (University of Oxford, UK)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 320 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 628 g, No
  • Sari: Advances in Chemistry Education Series Volume 2
  • Ilmumisaeg: 15-Feb-2019
  • Kirjastus: Royal Society of Chemistry
  • ISBN-10: 1788012127
  • ISBN-13: 9781788012126
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Hardback, 320 pages, kõrgus x laius: 234x156 mm, kaal: 628 g, No
  • Sari: Advances in Chemistry Education Series Volume 2
  • Ilmumisaeg: 15-Feb-2019
  • Kirjastus: Royal Society of Chemistry
  • ISBN-10: 1788012127
  • ISBN-13: 9781788012126
Teised raamatud teemal:
Many studies have highlighted the importance of discourse in scientific understanding. Argumentation is a form of scientific discourse that plays a central role in the building of explanations, models and theories. Scientists use arguments to relate the evidence that they select from their investigations and to justify the claims that they make about their observations. The implication is that argumentation is a scientific habit of mind that needs to be appropriated by students and explicitly taught through suitable instruction.



Edited by Sibel Erduran, an internationally recognised expert in chemistry education, this book brings together leading researchers to draw attention to research, policy and practice around the inclusion of argumentation in chemistry education. Split into three sections: Research on Argumentation in Chemistry Education, Resources and Strategies on Argumentation in Chemistry Education, and Argumentation in Context, this book blends practical resources and strategies with research-based evidence. The book contains state of the art research and offers educators a balanced perspective on the theory and practice of argumentation in chemistry education.

Arvustused

As a person interested in the application of argumentation techniques in teaching I was glad to be given the opportunity to review this book. It is made up of work supplied by 21 different experts in the area arranged in 12 separate chapters. Each chapter covers a specific area of chemistry teaching where argumentation has been implemented and they range from secondary school to university teaching. In each case the chapters contain practical information on how to apply the argumentation technique with chapters being completed with a Practical Digest. The book starts by covering the theory behind argumentation and defines argumentation as the author of a claim to knowledge makes an attempt to persuade his/her audience of the validity of his/ her claim through verbal reasoning and rebuttals. In other words, a scientific claim is justified to an audience and is defended against rebuttal. This requires careful structuring of the material delivered to the students and the unfamiliarity of the argumentation technique by teachers features in a number of the chapters covering pre-school training of teachers and CPD development. The chapters look at a range of potential delivery mechanisms including the use of cartoon-based material for secondary school teaching. There are numerous references in the book to the difficulties in assessing these teaching strategies with particular reference to marking the construction of arguments. There is a specific chapter covering this area with some very helpful suggestions in the computer technology support chapter. The computer chapter also covers electronic communities which have been set-up to support argumentation implementation. One area that I believe lends itself to the implementation of argumentation is practical work. Here the acquisition of real data is ideal for stimulating discussion and rebuttal. The book contains a chapter covering this area with a number of suggestions to help the introduction of some of the techniques with discussion of potential drawbacks. One suggestion made to encourage discussion of chemistry was to introduce it in the context of societal impact. Again a chapter is included covering this area with mention of applications also included in other chapters within the book. Some specific applications are covered in the chapters on organic and physical chemistry teaching. It is a pity that the two other areas of chemistry, inorganic and analytical, are not covered in such detail. The technique is heavily dependent on verbal reasoning and discussions are held in two chapters in the book about the issues associated with students who may suffer in this area. Overall, I particularly enjoyed this book and would recommend it to anyone looking for a background and practical guide to the implementation of argumentation as a teaching technique for chemistry. The majority of the suggested delivery techniques could be easily adapted to a range of chemical areas and the recorded verbal feedback would give an insight to potential student responses which is invaluable. There are some small issues related to the books production. Some of the diagrams are of relatively poor quality but this could be in the version I was provided for the review. There were also a number of basic text errors which had not been identified in the editing process, but they did not affect my enjoyment of the book. -- Phil Riby, Liverpool John Moores University * Chromatographia *

Chapter 1 Argumentation in Chemistry Education: An Overview
1(10)
Sibel Erduran
1.1 Introduction
1(2)
1.2 Infusing Argumentation in Teaching and Learning
3(1)
1.3 Curriculum Context of Argumentation
4(1)
1.4 Overview of the Book
5(6)
References
9(2)
Chapter 2 Teaching and Learning Chemistry through Argumentation
11(21)
Mehmet Aydeniz
2.1 Teaching and Learning Chemistry through Argumentation
11(21)
2.1.1 Introduction
11(2)
2.1.2 Nature of Chemical Knowledge
13(2)
2.1.3 Argumentation Defined and Operationalized
15(9)
2.1.4 Conclusion and Discussion
24(3)
Practical Digest
27(2)
References
29(3)
Chapter 3 Interdisciplinarity and Argumentation in Chemistry Education
32(30)
Beatriz Crujeiras-Perez
Maria Pilar Jimenez-Aleixandre
3.1 Introduction
32(1)
3.2 Interdisciplinary in Chemical Education
33(5)
3.2.1 Interdisciplinary Thinking for Attaining Chemical Literacy
33(1)
3.2.2 Interdisciplinary Teaching and Learning in Chemistry
34(4)
3.3 Interdisciplinary Approaches for Knowledge Integration
38(4)
3.3.1 STEM Learning
38(1)
3.3.2 Knowledge Integration Through HPS and NOS
38(2)
3.3.3 Knowledge Integration Through SSI
40(2)
3.4 Argumentation in Interdisciplinary Settings in Chemistry Education
42(3)
3.4.1 Argumentation as a Scientific Practice: Participating in Science's Epistemic Goals
42(1)
3.4.2 Relevance of Argumentative Practices for Interdisciplinary Learning in Chemistry Education
43(2)
3.5 Argument-based Interdisciplinary Learning in Chemistry Education: Examples from Classroom Studies
45(7)
3.5.1 Use of Interdisciplinary Evidence for Drawing a Conclusion about how to Prevent Browning in Apples
45(2)
3.5.2 Use of Interdisciplinary Knowledge for Evaluating Arguments in Order to Make a Decision About where to Build a Nuclear Waste Deposit
47(3)
3.5.3 Applying an Interdisciplinary Simulation for Identifying the Best Toothpaste in Preventing Cavities
50(2)
3.6 Concluding Remarks
52(10)
Practical Digest
53(3)
Acknowledgements
56(1)
References
57(5)
Chapter 4 Lesson Resources and Teaching Strategies on Argumentation for Secondary Chemistry Education
62(17)
Alison Cullinane
Anne O'Dwyer
4.1 Introduction
52(1)
4.2 Concept Cartoons
53(14)
4.2.1 Lesson Ideas Using a Concept Cartoon
64(2)
4.2.2 Ideas for Argumentation in Lower Secondary
66(1)
4.2.3 Ideas for Argumentation in Upper Secondary
67(1)
4.3 Evidence-based Reasoning Approach
67(3)
4.3.1 Lesson Ideas using Evidence-based Reasoning
68(2)
4.4 Writing Frames
70(2)
4.5 Social Media
72(3)
4.5.1 Lesson Idea: Coal Versus Renewable Energy
73(1)
4.5.2 Lesson Idea: The Great Plastic Race
74(1)
4.6 Conclusions
75(4)
References
75(4)
Chapter 5 Using Computer Technology to Support the Teaching and Learning of Argumentation in Chemistry
79(27)
J. Bryan Henderson
Jonathan F. Osborne
5.1 The Intersection of Computer Technology and Scientific Argumentation
79(1)
5.2 Online Learning Communities
80(3)
5.2.1 Asynchronous Versus Synchronous Argumentation
80(2)
5.2.2 Strategic Composition of Groups
82(1)
5.3 Digital Scaffolding
83(3)
5.3.1 Accessing and Organizing Evidence
83(1)
5.3.2 Visualization Tools
83(3)
5.3.3 Argument Mapping
86(1)
5.4 Supporting Argumentation through Classroom Response Technology
86(4)
5.4.1 Braincandy
86(4)
5.5 Supporting Argumentation through Computerized Assessment
90(9)
5.5.1 DiALoG: Supporting the Assessment of Oral Arguments
90(5)
5.5.2 Supporting the Assessment of Written Arguments
95(4)
5.6 Implications for Chemistry Education
99(7)
Practical Digest
102(1)
Acknowledgements
103(1)
References
103(3)
Chapter 6 Assessment of Argumentation in Chemistry: A Model for Designing Items
106(36)
Ng Yee Ping Diana
6.1 Introduction
106(2)
6.2 Argumentation in Science Education
108(1)
6.3 Science Curriculum and Argumentation
109(2)
6.4 Assessment of Science Curricula and Argumentation
111(7)
6.5 Learning Progressions in Scientific Argumentation
118(6)
6.6 Implications for the Conceptualisation and Design of Argumentation Items
124(11)
6.6.1 Three Cornerstones of a Model for Designing-Scientific Argumentation Items
126(1)
6.6.2 Deployment of Model for Item-setting in Chemistry
127(8)
6.7 Limitations and Future Directions
135(7)
Practical Digest
136(1)
References
137(5)
Chapter 7 Research and Practice on Science Teachers' Continuous Professional Development in Argumentation
142(31)
Carla Zembal-Saul
Abha Vaishampayan
7.1 Introduction
142(1)
7.2 Teacher Professional Learning in Argumentation
143(3)
7.3 Argumentation in the Context of Reform
146(2)
7.4 Argumentation as a Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Practice
148(4)
7.5 Science Teachers' Learning Needs
152(2)
7.6 Promising Approaches for Science Teacher Learning
154(5)
7.7 Scaling Up Science Teacher Professional Development
159(3)
7.8 Argumentation and Equity
162(3)
7.9 Summary
165(8)
Practical Digest
166(3)
Acknowledgements
169(1)
References
169(4)
Chapter 8 The Development of Argumentation Skills in the Chemistry Laboratory
173(24)
Avi Hofstein
Dvora Katchevitch
Rachel Mamlok-Naaman
8.1 Introduction: The History of the Laboratory in Science Education
173(2)
8.2 Learning in and from the Science Laboratory
175(3)
8.3 New Era New Goals: Goals for Learning in and from the Science Laboratory in the Twenty-first Century
178(1)
8.4 Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory
178(6)
8.5 Challenges in Implementing Argumentation in the Chemistry Laboratory
184(1)
8.6 Teachers' Behaviour in the Chemistry Laboratory
185(1)
8.7 Students' Behaviour in the Chemistry Laboratory
185(3)
8.8 Summary
188(9)
Practical Digest
189(6)
References
195(2)
Chapter 9 Argumentation within Societal Contexts in Chemistry Education
197(31)
Andri Christodoulou
Marcus Grace
9.1 Introduction
197(3)
9.2 Socioscientific Issues in the Chemistry Curriculum in England
200(1)
9.2.1 Chemical and Allied Industries
200(1)
9.2.2 Earth and Atmospheric Science
200(1)
9.3 Argumentation and Socioscientific Issues
201(5)
9.4 Active Citizenship through Socioscientific Argumentation
206(3)
9.5 Socioscientific Inquiry-based Learning and Chemistry Education
209(5)
9.5.1 SSIBL in Action: The Personal, Local and Global Dimensions of Climate Change
212(2)
9.6 The Potential of SSIBL for Green and Sustainable Chemistry Education
214(1)
9.7 Conclusions
215(13)
Practical Digest
217(5)
Acknowledgements
222(1)
References
222(6)
Chapter 10 Argumentation in Organic Chemistry Education
228(19)
Aybuke Pabuccu
10.1 Why Do Some Students Struggle with Organic Chemistry?
228(5)
10.2 Research on Argumentation in Organic Chemistry
233(1)
10.3 Example Activities to Support the Incorporation of Argumentation in Organic Chemistry Lessons
234(5)
10.4 The Effects of Incorporating Argumentation into the Organic Chemistry Classroom
239(2)
10.5 Reflections as a Teacher Educator
241(6)
Practical Digest
242(3)
References
245(2)
Chapter 11 Argumentation in Physical Chemistry
247(28)
Marcy H. Towns
Rente S. Cole
Alena C. Moon
Courtney Stanford
11.1 Introduction
247(2)
11.2 Participants, Settings, and Methods
249(6)
11.2.1 Participants and Settings
249(3)
11.2.2 Methods
252(1)
11.2.3 Toulmin's Argumentation Scheme
252(2)
11.2.4 Inquiry-oriented Discursive Moves
254(1)
11.2.5 Johnstone's Triangle
254(1)
11.2.6 Chemical Thinking Learning Progression
254(1)
11.2.7 Material Analysis
255(1)
11.3 Student Argumentation -- Understanding of Content and Reasoning
255(4)
11.4 Classroom Argumentation -- Influence of Course Materials
259(4)
11.5 Promoting Productive Discourse Through Facilitation
263(5)
11.6 Conclusions and Implications
268(7)
Practical Digest
270(1)
Acknowledgements
271(1)
References
272(3)
Chapter 12 Supporting Argumentation in Chemistry Education in Low-income Contexts
275(17)
Audrey Msimanga
Brighton Mudadigwa
12.1 Introduction
275(1)
12.2 The South African Context
276(2)
12.3 The South African Chemistry Curriculum Context
278(1)
12.4 The Role of Argumentation
279(1)
12.5 Argumentation in the South African Context
280(2)
12.6 Development of Dialogic Discourse - How to Get Learners Talking and Arguing
282(1)
12.7 Illustrating Argumentation in South African Chemistry Classrooms
283(5)
12.7.1 Teacher Questioning and Responses to Learner Contributions
283(3)
12.7.2 Shared Understanding of Goals and Working with Learner Language
286(2)
12.8 Discussion and Conclusions
288(4)
References
289(3)
Subject Index 292