Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Atonement and Comparative Theology: The Cross in Dialogue with Other Religions New edition [Kõva köide]

Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Edited by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by
Teised raamatud teemal:
Teised raamatud teemal:
"The central Christian belief in salvation through the suffering, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ remains one of the most intractable mysteries of Christian faith. Throughout history, it has given rise to various theories of atonement, many of which have been subject to critique as they no longer speak to contemporary notions of evil and sin or to current conceptions of justice. One of the important challenges for contemporary Christian theology thus involves exploring new ways of understanding the salvific meaning of the cross. In Atonement and Comparative Theology, Christian theologians with expertise in Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Daoism, and African Religions reflect on how engagement with these traditions sheds new light on the Christian understanding of atonement by pointing to analogous structures of sin and salvation, drawing attention to the scandal of the cross as seen by the religious other, and re-interpreting aspects of the Christian understanding of atonement. Together, theyillustrate the possibilities for comparative theology to deepen and enrich Christian theological reflection"--

The central Christian belief in salvation through the suffering, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ remains one of the most intractable mysteries of Christian faith. Throughout history, it has given rise to various theories of atonement, many of which have been subject to critique as they no longer speak to contemporary notions of evil and sin or to current conceptions of justice. One of the important challenges for contemporary Christian theology thus involves exploring new ways of understanding the salvific meaning of the cross.

In Atonement and Comparative Theology, Christian theologians with expertise in Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Daoism, and African Religions reflect on how engagement with these traditions sheds new light on the Christian understanding of atonement by pointing to analogous structures of sin and salvation, drawing attention to the scandal of the cross as seen by the religious other, and re-interpreting aspects of the Christian understanding of atonement. Together, they illustrate the possibilities for comparative theology to deepen and enrich Christian theological reflection.

Introduction 1
Catherine Cornille
Why Atonement?Who Needs It?
Atonement in Muslim-Christian Theological Engagement 11
Daniel A. Madigan, S.J.
Christian Atonement Enlightened by a Buddhist Perspective on Craving 40
Thierry-Marie Courau, O. P.
How Q 5:75 Can Help Christians Conceptualize Atonement 61
Klaus von Stosch
Not for Myself Alone: Atonement and Penance After Daoism 78
Bede Benjamin Bidlack
Suffering and the Scandal of the Cross
God's Suffering in the Hindu-Christian Gaze 105
Francis X. Clooney, S . J .
More Than Meets the Eye: The Cross as Maala 130
Michelle Voss Roberts
Divine Suffering and Covenantal Belonging:
Considering the Atonement with Heschel and Moltmann 149
Daniel Joslyn-Siemiatkoski
The Clash and Continuity of Interpretation of Redemptive Suffering
Between African Religions and Christianity 167
Elochukwu Uzukwu, C.S.Sp.
Rethinking Redemption
Redemptive Suffering After the Shoah:
Going Back and Forth Between Jewish and Christian Traditions 189
Marianne Moyaert
Judgment on the Cross: Resurrection as Divine Vindication 214
Joshua Ralston
"At One or Not At One?" Christian Atonement in Light of Buddhist
Perspectives 239
Leo D. Lefebure
How Empty Is the Cross? Realization and Novelty in Atonement 259
S. Mark Heim
Bibliography 281
List of Contributors 301
Index 305
Catherine Cornille is Professor of Comparative Theology at Boston College, where she holds the Newton College Alumnae Chair of Western Culture. She is the author of The Im-Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue and Meaning and Method in Comparative Theology.