Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xvi | |
|
Table of Significant Codes, Restatements, and Statutes |
|
|
xviii | |
|
1 Why Autonomous Organizations? |
|
|
1 | (17) |
|
1.1 Even if Software Can Buy a House, Why Would It Want To? |
|
|
4 | (5) |
|
1.2 Algorithms in Conventional Legal Context |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
1.3 Modern Approaches to Software "Rights" |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
1.4 A Comment on "Rights" and "Personhood" |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
2 The Legal Role of Algorithms |
|
|
18 | (28) |
|
2.1 Algorithm As Agreement |
|
|
21 | (6) |
|
2.2 Algorithms As a Comprehensive Basis for Contract Formation |
|
|
27 | (7) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.4 The Unsuitability of Agency Law for Software |
|
|
35 | (11) |
|
2.4.1 The Ambiguities of Agency Law As Applied to Algorithmic Agents |
|
|
37 | (3) |
|
2.4.2 The Ambiguous Principals of Algorithmic Agents. |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
2.4.3 The Complexity of Liability in Agency Law |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
3 In the Company of Robots The Creation of Autonomous Organizations |
|
|
46 | (30) |
|
3.1 Background: Legal Personhood As "Legal Technology" |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
3.2 The Novelty of Modern Entities in Enabling Nonhuman Autonomous Systems |
|
|
51 | (7) |
|
|
58 | (9) |
|
3.4 Models of Private-Law Personhood for Software |
|
|
67 | (6) |
|
3.4.1 Frameworks for Granting Legal Personhood |
|
|
60 | (10) |
|
3.4.2 Formal versus Substantive Legal Personhood |
|
|
70 | (3) |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
4 The Legal Viability of Autonomous Organizations. |
|
|
76 | (41) |
|
4.1 The Focus of the Objections to Autonomous Organizations |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
4.2 The Workability of LLCs without Ongoing Human Internal Governance |
|
|
80 | (12) |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
4.3 The Legal Soundness of Autonomous Entities Under Current Statutes |
|
|
92 | (12) |
|
4.3.1 Statutory Definitions |
|
|
93 | (5) |
|
4.3.2 Business-Law Foundations |
|
|
98 | (6) |
|
4.4 Are Autonomous Organizations "Absurd," So That Courts Will Strike Them Down? |
|
|
104 | (6) |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
4.4.2 Identifying the Absurdity |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.4.3 The Context of Technological Change |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
4.5 Autonomous Organizations and the Internal-Affairs Doctrine |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
5 The Advantages of Autonomous Organizations |
|
|
117 | (30) |
|
5.1 Apparent Problems That Aren't Really Problems |
|
|
119 | (23) |
|
5.1.1 Disaggregating the Rights of Legal Personality |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
5.1.2 The Dignity of Contracting with Software |
|
|
124 | (9) |
|
5.1.3 The Renewed Vitality of Dead-Hand Control |
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
5.1.4 Dangers of Artificial Intelligence |
|
|
138 | (4) |
|
5.2 Practical Autonomy and Legal Function |
|
|
142 | (5) |
|
6 The Limitations and Legal Implications of Autonomous Organizations |
|
|
147 | (22) |
|
6.1 The Role of Intent in the Private Law |
|
|
149 | (12) |
|
6.1.1 Intentional Torts, Conventional Organizations, and Autonomous Organizations |
|
|
150 | (8) |
|
6.1.2 Intent and Contracts |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
6.1.3 Punishing Bad Intent |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
6.2 Drift, Abuse, and Formalism in Organizational Law |
|
|
161 | (8) |
|
6.2.1 Legal Recognition of Evolving Expectations |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Judicial Administration and Dissolution |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
6.2.3 The Equitable Doctrine of Reformation |
|
|
166 | (3) |
Conclusion |
|
169 | (2) |
Index |
|
171 | |