| Preface |
|
iii | |
|
|
|
xi | |
|
|
|
xiii | |
| Summary |
|
xvii | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xxxiii | |
| Abbreviations |
|
xxxv | |
|
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan |
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
Contribution of This Monograph |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
Value of Parcels Already Acquired by RCA |
|
|
9 | (12) |
|
Land Purchased by RCA as of 2007 |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Data and Methods Used to Project the Value of the Current Portfolio |
|
|
10 | (7) |
|
|
|
12 | (4) |
|
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Current Value of Parcels Already Acquired by RCA |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Value of Land Required for the MSHCP Reserve |
|
|
21 | (30) |
|
|
|
21 | (11) |
|
Broad Guidelines for Reserve Assembly |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Conceptual Reserve Design |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Parcel-Level Issues That Affect Reserve-Assembly Scenarios |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Reserve-Assembly Scenarios |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Value of Land in Reserve-Assembly Scenarios |
|
|
32 | (7) |
|
Total and Average Land-Value Estimates for the Reserve-Assembly Scenarios |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Confidence Intervals for the Land-Value Estimates |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
Disaggregation of Land-Value Estimates by Land Use and Location |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
Cost Implications of Rerouting Linkage Corridors to Avoid Heavily Developed Parcels |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
Remaining Costs for Local Permittees |
|
|
39 | (4) |
|
Performance of Assembly Scenarios Against Conservation Goals |
|
|
43 | (5) |
|
Understanding Acreage Shortfalls by Rough-Step Area Using the USFWS CRD |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
Financial Implications of Temporal Acquisition Strategies |
|
|
51 | (20) |
|
|
|
52 | (10) |
|
Simulating Future Land-Price Paths |
|
|
52 | (6) |
|
Modeling RCA Acquisition Strategies |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
Integrating Land-Value Scenarios and Acquisition Strategies |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Discount Rate Used to Calculate Present Value |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
|
62 | (5) |
|
Effects of Pacing Strategies |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
Effects of Timing Strategies |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
Policy Implications for RCA |
|
|
67 | (3) |
|
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Costs of Implementing the MSHCP and Operating the Reserve |
|
|
71 | (20) |
|
|
|
71 | (13) |
|
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
Adaptive-Management Costs |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
Biological-Monitoring Costs |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
Plan Implementation and RCA Oversight Costs |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
Caveats and Risk Considerations |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
Projected Revenue for RCA |
|
|
91 | (18) |
|
|
|
91 | (12) |
|
Local Development Mitigation Fee |
|
|
92 | (4) |
|
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Other Transportation Fees |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Other Infrastructure Fees |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Gap Between Local Costs and Revenue |
|
|
105 | (4) |
|
Additional Local Revenue Options |
|
|
109 | (20) |
|
Sources of Revenue for Other HCPs |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
Analysis of Options per Billion Dollars Raised |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Pay-as-You-Go and Borrowing Strategies |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Effect of Increased Taxes on Behavior |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Option 1: Ad Valorem Property Tax |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Option 3: Special Property Assessments |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Option 4: Mello-Roos Taxes |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Using Deferred Assessments to Collect Property Taxes and Special Assessments |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Option 5: Documentary Transfer Tax |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Option 6: Local Development-Mitigation Fee |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
Option 8: Vehicle-License Fee |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Option 9: Vehicle-Registration Fee |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
Increase Needed to Raise $1 Billion |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Political Acceptability of Revenue Mechanisms |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
The MSHCP's Effects on the Permitting Process for Transportation and Development Projects |
|
|
129 | (32) |
|
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
Features of the MSHCP That May Speed or Slow the Permitting Process |
|
|
132 | (5) |
|
Potential Effect on the Assessment of Project Environmental Impacts |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Potential Impact on the Project Siting and Design Processes |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Potential Impact on the Process of Determining Adequate Mitigation |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Potential Impact on Litigation |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Stakeholder Perceptions of the Features of the MSHCP That May Accelerate or Slow Permitting Processes |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
Ways in Which the MSHCP Speeds Project Delivery |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
Attributes of the MSHCP That Reduce Its Effectiveness |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
Synthesis of the MSHCP's Perceived Strengths and Weaknesses |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
The MSHCP's Effect to Date on Projects to Build New or Expand Existing Roads |
|
|
140 | (10) |
|
Transportation Projects Identified in the Questionnaire Responses |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
Projects That Have Completed One or More Major Steps in the Permitting Process |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
Projects That Have Not Completed One or More Major Steps in the Permitting Process |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
The MSHCP's Effect to Date on Road Saftey and Maintenance Projects |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
The MSHCP's Effect to Date on Development Projects |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
The MSHCP's Effect to Date on Lawsuits |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
Expected Future Effects of the MSHCP on Transportation and Development Projects |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
The MSHCP's Effect on Mobility in Western Riverside County |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
|
|
157 | (4) |
|
|
|
161 | (64) |
|
Value of Land Needed for the Reserve |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Land-Acquisition Strategy |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
The Adequacy of Revenues to Fund the Plan |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Additional Revenue Options |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
Prospects for Achieving the Habitat-Conservation Goals of the Reserve |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
The MSHCP's Benefits for Infrastructure Construction |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
A. Specification and Estimation of the Land-Value Model |
|
|
169 | (10) |
|
B. Examples of Simulated Land-Price Paths |
|
|
179 | (4) |
|
C. Revenue Sources for Existing Habitat-Conservation Plans |
|
|
183 | (4) |
|
D. Integrating Funding for Infrastructure Construction and Conservation |
|
|
187 | (10) |
|
E. The Effect of the MSHCP on Mobility in Western Riverside County |
|
|
197 | (18) |
|
F. Future Changes in the Permitting Process |
|
|
215 | (10) |
| References |
|
225 | |