Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Cambridge Handbook of Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards [Kõva köide]

Edited by , Edited by , Edited by (University of Florida)
  • Formaat: Hardback, 484 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 259x181x27 mm, kaal: 1090 g, Worked examples or Exercises; 2 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white
  • Sari: Cambridge Law Handbooks
  • Ilmumisaeg: 29-Oct-2020
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108488617
  • ISBN-13: 9781108488617
Teised raamatud teemal:
Cambridge Handbook of Judicial Control of Arbitral AwardsSuurem pilt
  • Formaat: Hardback, 484 pages, kõrgus x laius x paksus: 259x181x27 mm, kaal: 1090 g, Worked examples or Exercises; 2 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white
  • Sari: Cambridge Law Handbooks
  • Ilmumisaeg: 29-Oct-2020
  • Kirjastus: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1108488617
  • ISBN-13: 9781108488617
Teised raamatud teemal:
Püsilink: https://www.kriso.ee/db/9781108488617.html
Märksõnad:
This handbook is a must read for academics, arbitrators, practitioners, and students interested in a comparative analysis of the convergence and divergence of national and international commercial arbitration rules. The core areas of focus include the enforcement and vacation of arbitral awards and the interpretation of arbitration agreements.

A unique collaboration between academic scholars, legal practitioners, and arbitrators, this handbook focuses on the intersection of arbitration - as an alternative to litigation - and the court systems to which arbitration is ultimately beholden. The first three parts analyze issues relating to the interpretation of the scope of arbitration agreements, arbitrator bias and conflicts of interest, arbitrator misconduct during the proceedings, enforceability of arbitral awards, and the grounds for vacating awards. The next section features fifteen country-specific reviews, which demonstrate that, despite the commonality of principles at the international level, there is a significant of amount of differences in the application of those principles at the national level. This work should be read by anyone interested in the general rules and principles of the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards and the grounds for courts to vacate or annul such awards.

Arvustused

'The most valuable feature of this excellent work is that it will be a very efficient and reliable source of information for lawyers coming from jurisdictions having different laws and practices on topics of great importance in the contemporary world of international arbitration. This will be a notable contribution to further development of this way of dispute settlement.' Professor Alexander S. Komarov, Member of the Presidium of the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation 'This valuable new sourcebook provides a detailed look at the zones of intersection between state courts and arbitration including conflicts of interest, arbitrator misconduct, and the enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards. A notable feature of the book is the country reports on judicial control of arbitration in 15 major jurisdictions. The book will prove to be a useful reference for practitioners and a source of rich insights for students and scholars of comparative international law. I highly recommend it.' Dr. Michael Moser, Twenty Essex Chambers, Past Chairman, Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre 'The intersection between arbitration and courts is at a procedural crossroad that is critically relevant in both theory and practice. The analyses collected in this book offer a unique and invaluable guidance to those who find themselves at this intersection.' Tibor Várady, Emeritus Professor Emory University and Emeritus Professor Central European University ' the book is an interesting and enlightening collection of essays and will be of value to practitioners, scholars, and students looking for specific guidance on discrete issues as well as a broad overview of the international arbitration universe.' Michail Risvas, Journal of World Investment & Trade

Muu info

This unique collaboration between academics and practitioners explores the intersection of international commercial arbitration and the court systems.
List of Contributors
xxiii
Preface xxvii
PART I VACATING COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS
1 Introduction: Intersection of Courts and Arbitration
3(9)
Larry A. DiMatteo
Marta Infantino
Nathalie M-P Potin
1 Jurisdiction of Arbitral Panels and Judicial Intervention
4(2)
1.1 Standard of Review
4(1)
1.2 Principle of Separability and Kompetenz-Kompetenz
5(1)
1.3 Judicial Intervention
5(1)
2 Scope of the Book
6(2)
2.1 Roles of Courts and Governments
6(1)
2.2 Arbitrator Bias
6(1)
2.3 Misconduct during Arbitral Proceedings
6(1)
2.4 Role of Public Policy: Due Process
7(1)
2.5 Scope of Arbitration
7(1)
2.6 Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
7(1)
2.7 Industry-Specific Arbitration
7(1)
2.8 Drafting and Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses
7(1)
2.9 Comparative Analysis: Country Reports
7(1)
3 Structure of the Book
8(4)
2 Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators
12(17)
Carlos A. Matheus Lopez
1 Background
12(1)
2 Independence and Impartiality
13(5)
2.1 Conceptual Analysis
13(3)
2.2 Summary
16(1)
2.3 Reflections from Legal Theory
17(1)
3 National Arbitration Laws and Rules
18(3)
3.1 National Arbitration Laws
18(1)
3.2 ICSID Convention and Rules
19(1)
3.3 UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules
20(1)
3.4 Institutional Rules
20(1)
4 Standards for Assessing Independence and Impartiality
21(1)
5 Complementary Element: Duty of Disclosure
22(1)
6 Efforts to Systematize Regulations
23(1)
7 Need to Set Limits
24(4)
7.1 Scope of Possible Relationships
25(2)
7.2 Model Proposal
27(1)
8 Criteria to Challenge an Arbitrator
28(1)
3 Exploring the Parameters of Conflicts of Interest
29(25)
Nathalie M-P Potin
Tunde Ogunseitan
1 Introduction
29(6)
1.1 Definition
29(1)
1.2 Soft Law to Regulate Independence and Impartiality
30(2)
1.3 Disclosures under the IBA Guidelines and Consequences of Breach of Duty to Disclose
32(3)
2 English Courts' Perspective
35(10)
3 French Courts' Perspective
45(4)
4 Duty of Disclosure for Third-Party Funding
49(3)
5 Conclusion
52(2)
4 Procedural Irregularities and Arbitrator Misconduct during Proceedings
54(17)
Alexander J. Belohlavek
1 Introduction
54(1)
2 Procedural Irregularities and Arbitrator Misconduct: Remedies
54(6)
2.1 During Proceedings
54(2)
2.2 ICC and LCIA Challenges against Arbitrators during the Proceedings
56(1)
2.2.1 Bias
57(1)
2.2.2 Prejudgment
58(1)
2.2.3 Ex-Parte Communication
59(1)
2.2.4 Language of Animosity
59(1)
2.2.5 Case Study
60(1)
3 Setting Aside and Preventing Enforcement
60(3)
3.1 Contracting Out of Challenging an Arbitral Award?
60(1)
3.2 Grounds for Setting Aside Awards and Resisting Enforcement under the New York Convention
61(1)
3.3 General Observations
62(1)
3.4 Are the Differences in Grounds Important?
62(1)
4 Violation of Due Process
63(4)
4.1 Departure from Rule of Procedure
64(1)
4.2 Exceeding Powers
65(1)
4.3 Lesotho Case
66(1)
4.4 Occidental Case: Partial Annulment
66(1)
5 Conclusion
67(4)
PART II ENFORCING COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS
5 Arbitrator Independence in Three Dimensions: Inter-arbitration Association Conflict
71(13)
Richard Happ
1 Introduction
71(1)
2 Classical Two-Dimensional Framework for Conflicts of Interest
71(5)
2.1 Vertical Dimension
72(1)
2.2 Horizontal Dimension
73(3)
3 Commodity Arbitration
76(5)
3.1 History
76(1)
3.2 Major Commodity Trading Associations
77(1)
3.3 Commodity Arbitrations Are Similar but Different
78(1)
3.3.1 Procedural Peculiarities
78(2)
3.3.2 Requirements for Arbitrators
80(1)
4 Conflicts between Rules
81(1)
5 Analysis
81(2)
6 Interdimensional Conflicts
83(1)
6 Requirements for the Enforceability of Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Overview
84(15)
Dario Moura Vicente
1 The Problem Defined
84(2)
1.1 The Rationale for the Enforceability of Arbitral Awards and the Legal Challenges It Faces
84(1)
1.2 Relevant Legal Sources and Their Interaction
85(1)
1.3 Scope and the Outline of the
Chapter
86(1)
2 Fundamental Approaches Underlying National Rules on Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
86(4)
2.1 Lex Facit Arbitrum
86(1)
2.2 Arbitral Awards as Expressions of an Autonomous Legal Order
87(2)
2.3 A Third Way
89(1)
3 Requirements for the Enforceability of Arbitral Awards in the Light of the Various Approaches to the Problem: Selected Aspects
90(4)
3.1 Need for Exequatur versus Direct Enforcement
90(2)
3.2 Enforceability versus Non-enforceability of Foreign Annulled Awards
92(1)
3.3 Domestic versus International or Transnational Public Policy
93(1)
4 Conclusion: A Perennial Problem?
94(5)
PART III SCOPE AND INTERPRETATION OF ARBITRATION CLAUSES
7 (udicial Interpretation of Standard Clauses
99(20)
Rocio Digon
Kamil Mchiz
Tony Cole
1 Introduction
99(2)
2 Overview of Standard Clauses
101(3)
3 Interpreting Standard Clauses
104(1)
4 Comparative Analysis of Court Interpretations of Standard Clauses
105(12)
4.1 Interpretation of Standard Arbitration Clauses in France
105(2)
4.2 Interpretation of Standard Arbitration Clauses in the United States
107(3)
4.3 Interpretation of Standard Arbitration Clauses in Hong Kong, SAR and China
110(1)
4.3.1 Hong Kong
111(1)
4.3.2 Mainland China
112(4)
4.3.3 Interpretation of Standard Arbitration Clauses in Argentina
116(1)
5 Conclusion
117(2)
8 Industry-Specific Clauses and Their Interpretation
119(11)
Alexandra-Luiza Ionescu (Mares)
1 Introduction
119(3)
1.1 Dispute Resolution in the Energy Sector
119(1)
1.2 Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Clauses
120(1)
1.2.1 Governing Law Clause
120(1)
1.2.2 Dispute Resolution Clause
121(1)
2 Arbitration in the Energy Sector: Overview
122(3)
2.1 Choice of Law
122(1)
2.2 Type of Arbitration: Ad Hoc versus Institutional
122(1)
2.3 Drafting a Suitable Arbitration Agreement
123(1)
2.3.1 Scope of Express Agreement to Arbitrate
123(1)
2.3.2 Seat of Arbitration
124(1)
2.3.3 Language of the Arbitration
124(1)
2.3.4 Composition of Arbitration
124(1)
3 Pathological Clauses
125(2)
3.1 How Pathological Can an Arbitration Clause Be?
125(1)
3.2 SIAC's Insigma v. Alstom
125(2)
4 Mediation Clauses in Energy Contracts
127(2)
5 Conclusion
129(1)
9 Drafting, Interpretation, and Enforcement of Commercial Arbitration Clauses: A Practitioner's Perspective
130(21)
Philippe Cavalieros
1 Introduction
130(1)
2 Drafting an Arbitration Agreement
131(8)
2.1 Negotiation
131(1)
2.2 Formal Requirements
131(1)
2.2.1 New York Convention
131(1)
2.2.2 Article II(i) of the New York Convention
132(1)
2.2.2.1 Agreement in Writing
132(1)
2.2.2.2 Existing or Future Disputes
133(1)
2.2.2.3 Defined Legal Relationship
133(1)
2.2.2.4 Subject Matter Capable of Settlement by Arbitration
133(1)
2.2.3 Article V(i)(a) of the New York Convention
134(1)
2.2.3.1 Parties' Legal Capacity
134(1)
2.2.3.2 Validity of the Arbitration Agreement
134(1)
2.3 Practical Requirements
135(1)
2.3.1 Essential Elements
135(1)
2.3.1.1 Express Reference to Arbitration
135(1)
2.3.1.2 Seat of Arbitration
135(1)
2.3.2 Recommended Elements
136(1)
2.3.2.1 Number of Arbitrators
136(1)
2.3.2.2 Institutional versus Ad Hoc Arbitration
136(1)
2.3.2.3 Choice of Law
137(1)
2.3.2.4 Language
138(1)
2.3.2.5 Exclusion of a Court Remedy
138(1)
2.3.3 Optional Elements
138(1)
2.3.3.1 Appointment of Arbitrators
138(1)
2.3.3.2 Confidentiality
139(1)
2.3.4 Templates
139(1)
3 Interpreting an Arbitration Agreement
139(4)
3.1 Existence, Validity and Scope of the Arbitration Agreement
139(2)
3.2 The Role of the Arbitrator
141(1)
3.2.1 Exclusivity of Arbitration Agreements
141(1)
3.2.2 Competence-Competence
141(2)
3.2.3 Examples
143(1)
4 Enforcement of an Arbitration Agreement
143(4)
4.1 Separability
143(1)
4.2 Arbitrability
144(1)
4.3 Nonsignatories
145(1)
4.4 Judicial Review
146(1)
5 Conclusion
147(4)
PART IV JUDICIAL CONTROL OF ARBITRAL AWARDS: COUNTRY REPORTS
10 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Argentina
151(24)
Maria Beatriz Burghetto
1 Introduction
151(1)
2 Background on Argentinean Arbitration Law
152(2)
2.1 Evolution of Argentinean Law of Arbitration
152(1)
2.2 Judicial and Governmental Attitudes towards Arbitration
153(1)
2.3 Arbitration-Related International Treaties Ratified by Argentina
154(1)
2.4 Recent Reforms to Argentinean Arbitration Law
154(1)
3 Impact of Recent Reforms
154(3)
3.1 2015 Reform: Modernisation of the Rules of Arbitration
154(1)
3.2 2018 Reform: New Federal Law on International Arbitration
155(1)
3.2.1 Genera] Aspects
155(1)
3.2.2 ALIA and Judicial Control of Arbitration
156(1)
3.2.3 Principles of Courts' Minimal Intervention under ALIA
157(1)
4 Judicial Control of Arbitration Agreement and Arbitral Proceedings
157(6)
4.1 Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements
158(2)
4.2 Arbitrator Disqualification: Conflict of Interest
160(1)
4.3 Anti-arbitration Injunctions
161(1)
4.3.1 Court's Order to Stay the Arbitral Proceedings while the Court Deals with the Terms of Reference
162(1)
4.3.2 Court's Order to Stay the Arbitral Proceedings while the Court Deals with the Challenge of an Arbitrator
163(1)
5 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards
163(10)
5.1 Annulment of Arbitral Awards Rendered in Argentina
164(1)
5.1.1 General Grounds for Annulment
164(1)
5.1.2 Arbitrability
165(1)
5.1.3 Public Policy Violation
165(1)
5.1.3.1 Definition of Public Policy
165(1)
5.1.3.2 Assimilation of the Doctrine of Arbitrary Judgment
166(1)
5.1.3.3 The Cartellone Case
167(1)
5.1.3.4 Case Law Inspired by the Cartellone Case
168(1)
5.1.3.5 Supreme Court's Restrictive View of the Grounds for Annulment of Awards
169(2)
5.1.3.6 Future of the Doctrine of Arbitrary Judgments in International Cases
171(1)
5.2 Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
172(1)
6 Attractiveness of a Country as Arbitration Venue
173(1)
7 Conclusion
174(1)
11 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Australia
175(23)
Nobumichi Teramura
Luke Nottage
James Morrison
1 Introduction
175(3)
2 Arbitrator Bias
178(2)
3 Conflict of Interest
180(1)
4 Procedural Inegularities and Arbitrator Misconduct during Proceedings
180(3)
4.1 Evidence and Hearings
181(1)
4.2 Exceeding Power
182(1)
4.3 Other Matters
183(1)
5 Objective Arbitrability
183(7)
5.1 Competition Law Issues
184(1)
5.2 Consumer Transactions
185(1)
5.2.1 Misleading and Deceptive Conduct
186(2)
5.2.2 Consumer Guarantees
188(1)
5.2.3 Unfair Contract Terms
188(1)
5.3 Other Arbitrability Issues
189(1)
5.4 Statutory Limitations on Objective Arbitrability
190(1)
6 Subjective Arbitrability: Judicial Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses
190(3)
7 Requirements for Enforcing Awards: Public Policy as a Ground for Refusal
193(4)
8 Conclusion
197(1)
12 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Bulgaria
198(12)
Oleg Temnikov
1 Introduction
198(6)
1.1 National Legislation
199(1)
1.2 International Conventions Concluded by Bulgaria
199(1)
1.3 ICAA Scope and Structure
200(1)
1.4 Arbitrability under Bulgarian Law
200(1)
1.5 Arbitration Agreement
201(1)
1.6 Mandatory Principles Applicable to the Arbitral Proceedings
202(1)
1.7 Intervention by State Courts
203(1)
1.8 Local Arbitration Institutions
203(1)
1.9 Trends or Statistics Relating to Arbitration
204(1)
2 Developments with Respect to the Scope of Arbitration in Bulgaria
204(3)
2.1 Non-arbitrability of Consumer Disputes
205(1)
2.2 Adaptation of Contracts
206(1)
3 Public Policy and Set Aside of Awards
207(1)
4 Other Recent Amendments in Relation to Arbitration
208(1)
4.1 Control of Arbitral Institutions
208(1)
4.2 Conditions and Qualifications for Arbitrators
208(1)
4.3 Obligation to Ensure Online Access to the Case File
209(1)
5 Conclusion
209(1)
13 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Mainland China
210(16)
Chen Lei
Wang Hao
1 Introduction
210(1)
2 Statutory Framework of Chinese Arbitration
210(2)
2.1 Dual-Track System and Its Legal Basis
210(1)
2.2 Institutional and Ad Hoc Arbitration
211(1)
2.3 Prior Reporting System
211(1)
3 Empirical Study on Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
212(5)
3.1 Legal Basis
212(1)
3.2 Empirical Studies
213(1)
3.3 Empirical Survey
214(3)
4 Case Analysis of Nonenforcement in Chinese Judicial Practice
217(8)
4.1 Validity of Arbitral Agreement
217(2)
4.2 Denial of Opportunity to Present Case
219(1)
4.3 Excess of Authority
220(1)
4.4 Defects in the Composition or Authority of Arbitral Tribunal
221(1)
4.5 Defects on the Binding Force of Arbitral Award
222(1)
4.6 Arbitrability
222(1)
4.7 Public Policy Exception
223(2)
5 Conclusion
225(1)
14 Certain Aspects of Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in France
226(17)
Denis Bensaude
1 History and French Arbitration Law
226(2)
2 Arbitration Agreements
228(3)
3 Arbitral Tribunal
231(4)
4 Award
235(7)
4.1 Enforcement of Award
236(2)
4.2 Setting Aside Awards
238(1)
4.3 Grounds for Setting Aside Awards
239(1)
4.3.1 Arbitral Tribunal Was Improperly Constituted
240(1)
4.3.2 Arbitral Tribunal Ruling Did Not Comply with Conferred Mission
240(1)
4.3.3 Violation of Principle of Due Process
241(1)
4.3.4 Enforcement of Award Contrary to International Public Policy
241(1)
5 Conclusion
242(1)
15 Commercial Arbitration in Germany
243(14)
Joseph Schwartz
1 Introduction
243(1)
2 Arbitrator's Independence and Impartiality
244(7)
2.1 General Considerations
244(1)
2.1.1 Legal Basis
244(1)
2.1.2 Purpose
245(1)
2.1.3 General Requirements
245(1)
2.1.3.1 Disclosure Duty
245(1)
2.1.3.2 Objective Threshold for Challenges
246(1)
2.1.3.3 IBA Rules on Conflicts of Interest
246(1)
2.1.4 2018 DIS Arbitration Rules: Impartiality and Independence
246(1)
2.2 Application of Standards to Determine Arbitrator's Bias
246(1)
2.2.1 Challenges Due to Prior Statements or Opinions
247(1)
2.2.2 Arbitrator's Conduct in Promotion of Settlements and Preliminary Assessments
248(1)
2.3 Consequences of a Lack of Impartiality or Independence
249(2)
3 Arbitrability and Enforceability
251(4)
3.1 Scope and Judicial Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements
251(2)
3.2 Arbitrability and Enforceability
253(2)
4 Conclusion
255(2)
16 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Italy
257(18)
Marta Infantino
1 Introduction
257(1)
2 Narratives and Numbers
257(4)
3 Special Regimes
261(2)
4 The Scope of Arbitration
263(2)
5 Vacating Arbitral Awards
265(6)
6 Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
271(3)
7 Conclusion
274(1)
17 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Nigeria
275(17)
Tunde Ogunseitan
Nathalie M-P Potin
1 Introduction
275(2)
2 Role of Court before Commencement of Arbitration
277(3)
2.1 Arbitration Agreement
277(1)
2.1.1 Doctrine of Separability
277(1)
2.1.2 Arbitrability and Public Policy
278(1)
2.2 Stay of Proceedings
278(2)
3 Role of Judiciary during Arbitration
280(2)
3.1 Procedural Irregularities and Arbitrator Misconduct during the Proceedings
280(1)
3.2 Determining Arbitrator Bias and Parameters of Conflict of Interest
281(1)
4 Role of Court after Arbitration: Recognition of Awards and Requirements for Enforceability
282(9)
4.1 Grounds for Refusal to Enforce
283(1)
4.2 Enforcement of Domestic Arbitral Awards
284(1)
4.3 Enforcement of International Awards
285(1)
4.3.1 Setting Aside of Award
285(1)
4.3.2 Procedure
286(1)
4.3.3 Grounds to Set Aside Award
286(2)
4.3.4 Setting Aside an International Arbitral Award
288(1)
4.3.5 Public Policy Cround
288(1)
4.4 How Far Can the Court Intervene?
289(2)
4.5 Delay to Decide Annulment
291(1)
5 Conclusion
291(1)
18 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Poland
292(14)
Jerzy Pisulinski
Piotr Tereszkiewicz
1 Introduction
292(1)
2 Arbitrability of Disputes
292(2)
2.1 Equality of the Parties to an Arbitration Agreement
293(1)
2.2 Law Applicable to an Arbitration Agreement
294(1)
3 Nature and Formal Requirements of an Arbitration Agreement
294(3)
3.1 Legal Nature of the Arbitration Agreement
294(1)
3.2 Content of Arbitration Agreement
295(1)
3.3 Arbitration Agreement and Third Parties
296(1)
3.4 Legal Effects of an Arbitration Agreement
296(1)
4 Arbitral Proceedings
297(4)
4.1 Substantive Law Governing the Merits of the Dispute
297(1)
4.2 Selection of Arbitrators and the Composition of the Arbitral Tribunal
298(1)
4.3 Impartiality of Arbitrators
298(1)
4.4 Proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal
299(1)
4.5 Arbitral Award
300(1)
4.6 Requirements of Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
301(1)
5 Setting Aside an Arbitral Award
301(4)
5.1 Limits of Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards
303(1)
5.2 Substantive Violations of Public Policy
304(1)
5.3 Procedural Violations of Public Policy
305(1)
6 Conclusion
305(1)
19 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Russia
306(14)
Dmitry Dozhdev
1 Introduction: Structure of Arbitration Law in Russia
306(1)
2 State Courts and Arbitration: Issues of Assistance and Control
307(3)
2.1 Interim Measures
308(1)
2.2 Competence-Competence Principle
308(1)
2.3 Courts' Referring Parties to Arbitration
309(1)
3 Scope of Arbitration
310(2)
4 Vacating Arbitral Awards Issued in Russia
312(2)
4.1 Refusal from Challenging the Award
313(1)
4.2 Grounds for Vacation of Arbitral Awards
313(1)
5 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
314(5)
5.1 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and Grounds for Refusal
314(1)
5.2 Public Policy Exception
315(4)
6 Conclusion
319(1)
20 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Spain
320(16)
Teresa Rodriguez de Ias Heras Ballell
1 Spanish Arbitration Act in Context
320(4)
1.1 Evolution and Main Features
320(2)
1.2 Numbers and Statistics: Arbitration in Spain
322(1)
1.3 Essence of Arbitration: Constitutionality and Sphere of Arbitrability
323(1)
2 Annulment of Arbitral Awards: Perimeter and Grounds
324(7)
2.1 Grounds for Setting Aside Arbitral Awards
325(1)
2.2 Interpretation and Application by Courts
326(1)
2.2.1 Arbitration Agreement
326(1)
2.2.1.1 Existence of a Clear, Unequivocal, and Observable Consent
326(1)
2.2.1.2 Validity of Hybrid Clauses
327(1)
2.2.1.3 Rules of Interpretation and the Scope of the Arbitration Agreement
327(2)
2.2.2 Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators
329(1)
2.2.3 Procedural Irregularities
329(1)
2.3 Waiver of the Action for Setting Aside the Arbitral Award
330(1)
3 Public Policy as Grounds for Setting Aside: Use and Abuse
331(2)
3.1 Concept and Scope of Public Policy: Exception in Arbitration
331(1)
3.2 Notion of "Economic Public Policy" as an Inflexion Point: Extent, Relevance, and Prospects
332(1)
4 Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
333(1)
5 Assessment and Expectations
334(2)
21 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Switzerland
336(16)
Phillip Landolt
1 General Comments on International Arbitration Law in Switzerland
336(1)
2 Judicial Interpretation of Scope of Arbitration Clauses
337(4)
3 Requirements for Enforceability of Awards
341(2)
4 Bias of Arbitrators
343(2)
5 Procedural Irregularities and Arbitrators' Misconduct during Proceedings
345(3)
6 Anti-arbitration Law and Public Policy
348(3)
7 Conclusion
351(1)
22 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in Ukraine
352(21)
Galyna Mykhailiuk
Nina Mykhailiuk
1 Introduction
352(2)
2 Grounds for Vacating Arbitral Awards Due to Arbitrator Bias
354(2)
3 Impartiality and Conflict of Interest
356(1)
4 Procedural Irregularities and Misconduct during Proceedings
357(4)
5 Anti-arbitration Law and Public Policy
361(3)
6 Requirements for Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards
364(5)
7 Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses by Courts
369(2)
8 Conclusion
371(2)
23 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in the United Kingdom
373(24)
Andrew Tetley
1 Introduction
373(1)
2 Vacating Commercial Arbitration Awards
373(8)
2.1 Independence and Impartiality of International Arbitrators
373(1)
2.2 Parameters of Conflict of Interest
374(2)
2.3 Procedural Irregularity and Misconduct of Arbitrators during Proceedings
376(1)
2.3.1 Appeal on a Point of Law
376(1)
2.3.2 Substantive Jurisdiction
377(1)
2.3.3 Serious Irregularity
378(3)
3 Enforcing Commercial Arbitration Awards
381(13)
3.1 Anti-arbitration Law and Public Policy
381(4)
3.2 Public Policy
385(1)
3.3 Statistics
386(1)
3.4 Requirements for Enforceability of Awards
387(7)
4 Judicial Interpretation of Commercial Arbitration Clauses
394(3)
24 Judicial Control of Arbitral Awards in the United States
397(20)
Larry A. DiMatteo
1 Introduction
397(1)
2 Principles of Separability and Kompetenz-Kompetenz in American Law
398(2)
3 Structure of Arbitration Law in the United States
400(3)
3.1 Federal Arbitration Act
400(1)
3.2 Grounds for Vacating Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Analysis
401(2)
3.3 Grounds for Judicial Modification of Arbitral Awards
403(1)
4 Recent Narrowing in Standing in Arbitration
403(2)
4.1 Class Action Arbitration
404(1)
5 Scope of Arbitration's Jurisdiction
405(1)
6 Enforcement and Vacation of Arbitral Awards
406(5)
6.1 Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
407(1)
6.2 Nonstatutory Grounds for Vacation of Awards: "Manifest Disregard Doctrine"
408(2)
6.3 Public Policy Exception
410(1)
7 Arbitrator Disqualification
411(2)
7.1 Impartiality and Conflict of Interest
411(1)
7.2 Fair Hearing Requirement
412(1)
7.3 Claims against Arbitral Institutions
412(1)
8 Conclusion
413(4)
PART V SUMMARY AND FINDINGS
25 Divergence, Themes, and Trends in National Arbitration Laws
417(26)
Larry A. DiMatteo
Marta Infantino
Nathalie M-P Potin
1 Introduction
417(1)
2 Setting Aside and Enforceability of Arbitral Awards
418(9)
2.1 General Features
419(3)
2.2 Setting Aside of Domestic and International Awards
422(3)
2.3 Enforcement and Recognition of Foreign Arbitral Awards
425(2)
3 Arbitrator Bias and Conflict of Interest
427(4)
3.1 Arbitrator Bias
427(2)
3.2 Conflict of Interest
429(2)
4 Arbitrator Misconduct
431(3)
5 Arbitration Clauses: Interpretation and Scope
434(3)
6 Anti-arbitration Policy
437(4)
7 Conclusion
441(2)
26 The Shared Control of Arbitral Awards
443
Friedrich Rosenfeld
1 Introduction
443(1)
2 Parties
443(3)
2.1 Limitations of Post-award Review
443(3)
2.2 Expansions of Post-award Review
446(1)
3 Arbitral Tribunal
446(3)
3.1 No Deference to Arbitral Determinations
447(1)
3.2 Deference to Arbitral Determinations
448(1)
3.3 Intermediary Positions
448(1)
4 Arbitral Institutions
449(2)
4.1 Deference to Determinations Made by Arbitral Institutions
449(1)
4.2 No Deference to Determinations Made by Arbitral Institutions
450(1)
5 Courts at the Seat
451(4)
5.1 Deference to Negative Decisions of Courts at the Seat
451(2)
5.2 Deference to Positive Decisions of Courts at the Seat
453(1)
5.3 Deference and the Need to Initiate Set-Aside Proceedings at the Seat
454(1)
6 Courts at the Place of Enforcement
455(1)
7 Conclusion
456
Larry A. DiMatteo is Huber Hurst Professor of Contract Law, Warrington College of Business and Levin College of Law at the University of Florida. He is the former Editor-in-Chief of the American Business Law Journal, a 2012 Fulbright Professor, and author of thirteen books including The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms (with Michel Cannarsa and Cristina Poncibò, Cambridge, 2019). Marta Infantino is Associate Professor of Comparative Law, IUSLIT Department, University of Trieste. She has held visiting professorships in Canada, Colombia, and France. She has authored or co-authored eight books and more than sixty articles in Italian, French, and English. Her work has been translated into Greek, Chinese, and Spanish. Nathalie M-P Potin is Academic Director of LL.M./Masters in English at the Faculty of Law, Catholic Univeristy of Lyon. She has practiced in several international commercial law firms and worked at the Secretariat of the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce. She holds visiting professorships in Europe, the Middle East, and the United States.