Preface |
|
v | |
Authors' Biographies |
|
xv | |
|
|
xxi | |
|
|
xxxi | |
|
Chapter 1 The Emergence and Application of the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
|
Professor D Rhidian Thomas |
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
Contracts to which the Rules apply |
|
|
4 | (6) |
|
Contracts for the international carriage of goods wholly or partly by sea |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Connection with Contracting States |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
Contracts to which the Rules do not apply - Excluded contracts |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Exclusion of certain contracts in liner transportation |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Inclusion of certain contracts in non-liner transportation |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Application of the Rotterdam Rules to third parties who are not original parties to an excluded contract |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
Carrier's period of responsibility under a contract of carriage to which the Rotterdam Rules apply |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
The enigma of volume contracts |
|
|
16 | (9) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
The idea accepted and re-drafted |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
Limitations on the right to vary |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Pre-conditions to the validity of a derogation |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Volume contracts and third parties |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Jurisdiction and arbitration clauses |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
A final thought about volume contracts |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Chapter 2 From Treaty to Trial - The Implementation of the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
|
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
Convention state obligations |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Interpretation under the VCLT |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Interpreting the Interpretation Article |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
Continuous interpretation |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
Volume contracts as an example |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Chapter 3 Interpreting the International Sea-Carriage Conventions: Old And New |
|
|
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
English legislative technique to treaty implementation |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
General principles of treaty interpretation |
|
|
39 | (5) |
|
(1) "Broad principles of general acceptation" |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
(2) The Vienna Convention |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Article 31 "The ordinary and natural meaning" |
|
|
44 | (14) |
|
(1) The authentic language of the Convention |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (4) |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
(4) Context, object and purpose |
|
|
54 | (4) |
|
Article 32 "Supplementary means of interpretation" |
|
|
58 | (8) |
|
(1) Publicity and availability |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
(2) The requisite standard for reception and use |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
(3) The "bull's eye" approach |
|
|
61 | (5) |
|
Uniformity and the law in other jurisdictions |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
The use of subsequent conventions |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
The Rotterdam Rules and special aspects of interpretation |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
(1) General drafting technique |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
(2) Article 2 and "good faith" |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
(3) A text divorced from English sources |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
Chapter 4 Freedom of Contract and the Rotterdam Rules: Framework for Negotiation or One-Size-Fits-All? |
|
|
|
Professor Andrew Tettenborn |
|
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
The scheme of the Rotterdam Rules and the anti-avoidance provisions - an overview |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Rotterdam: changes in the compulsory regime |
|
|
75 | (6) |
|
Compulsory regime extended to more forms of carriage contracts |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
Additions to the carrier's duty |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
The shipper's duty set in stone |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
Choice of jurisdiction rigidified |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Rotterdam: clarifications |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
FIOS ("free in, out, stowed") clauses |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (5) |
|
Carrier or freight intermediary? |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
Identity of the carrier and the demise clause |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
Chapter 5 Minimal Music: Multimodal Transport Including a Maritime Leg Under the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
|
|
The Rotterdam Rules do not constitute a comprehensive multimodal regime |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
The nature of the multimodal regime in the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (6) |
|
Carriage preceding or subsequent to sea carriage |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
Incidence of the period of responsibility |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Localised loss, damage and delay |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
Precedence only for international conventions |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
Precedence for limited subject matter only |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Precedence of mandatory regimes only |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (5) |
|
International conventions governing other modes of transport |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Existing international conventions |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (2) |
|
Carriage by rail and by inland waters |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
The scope of the unimodal conventions |
|
|
104 | (6) |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
Chapter 6 The Duties of Carriers Under the Conventions: Care and Seaworthiness |
|
|
|
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Relevant Provisions of the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules and the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
The Locus Standi of containers |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
"Jordan II": Codification |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
On-going duties of seaworthiness and cargoworthiness |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
Chapter 7 Package Limitation as an Essential Feature of the Modern Maritime Transport Treaties: A Critical Analysis |
|
|
|
Professor Marc A Huybrechts |
|
|
Package limitation in the three main transport treaties |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Some background facts regarding global/or tonnage limitation and package limitation |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
Package limitation: historic origin and justification |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
The formation of the Hague Rules, the principle of limitation is not challenged and the "no-joke" approach |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
The 1968 Visby Rules: what changes have been introduced? |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
The Package limitation in the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
The basis of the limitation amount |
|
|
130 | (6) |
|
|
131 | (3) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Limitation for losses caused by delay |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Loss of the benefit of limitation of liability under the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
Loss of the right to limit and deck cargo |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Limitation of actions under the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
Chapter 8 Exclusions of Liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
The frameworks of the carrier's liability: The shifting burdens |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
The Hague Rules exceptions |
|
|
145 | (13) |
|
Exceptions introduced by the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
The Rotterdam Rules and "Volume Contracts" |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
Chapter 9 Misdelivery Claims Under Bills of Lading and International Conventions for the Carriage of Goods by Sea |
|
|
|
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
The nature of the obligation in contract and conversion |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
Do misdelivery claims fall under the Hague and Hague-Visby Rules? |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Misdelivery and the Hague-Visby exceptions and limitations |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
Express exceptions and misdelivery |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
Contract or conversion? Measure of damages |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
Non-contractual claims for misdelivery |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Misdelivery suits under the Hamburg Rules |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
Misdelivery suits under the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
180 | (8) |
|
(1) Delivery under the Convention |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
(2) Defences under the Convention |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
(3) Compensation for misdelivery |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
(4) Claims in tort/bailment |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
(5) Misdelivery and maritime performing parties |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
Chapter 10 SOME REMARKS ON THE ALLOCATION OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER THE ROTTERDAM RULES AS COMPARED TO THE HAGUE (VISBY) RULES |
|
|
|
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
Duties of the carrier and his rights and immunities under the H(V)R |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
The burden of proof in article 4(1) H(V)R |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
The burden of proof in article 4(2)q H(V)R |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
The burden of proof under the H(V)R in general |
|
|
196 | (5) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
The allocation of the burden of proof based on the bailment doctrine |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
H(V)R: interim conclusion |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (5) |
|
Example 1 nautical fault (article 4(2) H(V)R) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Example 2 fire (article 4(2)(b) H(V)R) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Example 3 perils of the sea (article 4(2)(c) H(V)R) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
Example 4 the q-exception (article 4(2)q) |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
RR: duties of the carrier and his rights and immunities |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
RR: allocation of the burden of proof in general |
|
|
207 | (3) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Example 1 the nautical fault exception |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Example 2 the fire exception |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Example 3 perils of the sea |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Example 4 article 17(1) and 17(2) RR |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
Chapter 11 Duties of Shippers and Dangerous Cargoes |
|
|
|
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
The duty to deliver the goods ready for carriage |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
The duty to provide information |
|
|
220 | (5) |
|
Information required to properly handle and carry the goods |
|
|
221 | (2) |
|
Information required to comply with laws and regulations |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
Information required to issue the Bill of Lading |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Knowingly misstating nature or value of the goods |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
Additional information during the course of the carriage |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
|
225 | (4) |
|
Principle: fault-based liability |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
Exception: strict liability |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
Shipper's liability for other persons |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
Liability of the documentary shipper |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
|
229 | (6) |
|
What are "dangerous goods"? |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
Shipper's duties with respect to dangerous goods |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
Shipper's liabilities with respect to dangerous goods |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
Carrier's rights with respect to dangerous goods |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
The "duty" to give notice of loss |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
Chapter 12 Deck Cargo: Safely Stowed at Last or Still At Sea? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
The position under Anglo-American common law |
|
|
238 | (16) |
|
Cargo stated as being carried on deck and is so carried: claused bills of lading |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
No indication of deck carriage: clean bills of lading |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
239 | (4) |
|
The US approach: quasi-deviation |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Excuses for carriage on deck |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Liberties and duty of care |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
Custom of stowage on container ships and specialised carriers |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
250 | (3) |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (13) |
|
The Hague-Visby Rules: article IV Rule 2(A)-(Q) |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
A fault-based regime of liability and defences: article 17(2) and (3) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
Non-permissible deck carriage |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
Exclusively caused by their carriage on deck |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
Not exclusively caused by their carriage on deck |
|
|
260 | (1) |
|
Permissible deck carriage |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
Permissible deck carriage under Article 25(1) (a) and (c) |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
Permissible deck carriage under Article 25(1)(b) |
|
|
263 | (4) |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
Chapter 13 Transport Documents Under the International Conventions |
|
|
|
Professor Francis Reynolds |
|
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
|
275 | (8) |
|
Chapter 14 Electronic Documents and the Rotterdam Rules |
|
|
|
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
The CMI Rules on Electronic Document Interchange |
|
|
283 | (3) |
|
The UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
The Rotterdam Rules and electronic commerce |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
Practical experience with electronic bills of lading |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
ESS: Electronic Shipping Solutions |
|
|
293 | (2) |
|
Chapter 15 Impact of the Rotterdam Rules on the Himalaya Clause: The Port Terminal Operators' Case |
|
|
|
|
Contexts and considerations |
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
Replication of the Himalaya Clause by Treaty |
|
|
297 | (6) |
|
The scope of the application of the Rotterdam Rules and port terminal operators |
|
|
303 | (4) |
|
Himalaya-type protection and the period of responsibility |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
What constitute the "defences" under articles 4 and 19? |
|
|
308 | (5) |
|
Effect of deviation on the automatic Himalaya-type protection |
|
|
313 | (1) |
|
Indemnities and the automatic Himalaya-type protection |
|
|
313 | (1) |
|
|
314 | (5) |
|
Chapter 16 Jurisdiction And Arbitration |
|
|
|
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
The current international position |
|
|
320 | (2) |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Declaration by an EU Member State or the European Union |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
Party choice and volume contracts |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
Exclusive court jurisdiction agreement in a volume contract between the shipper and the carrier |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
Exclusive jurisdiction agreement in a volume contract between the carrier and someone other than the shipper |
|
|
327 | (2) |
|
Jurisdiction agreement concluded after the dispute has arisen |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
Submission to the jurisdiction of a competent court |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
Where there is no valid exclusive jurisdiction agreement |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
Action against a maritime performing party |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
Arrest and provisional or protective measures |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
Preserving choice of jurisdiction by the cargo interests |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
Recognition and enforcement |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
Comments on Chapter 14 on jurisdiction |
|
|
335 | (3) |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
Comments on Chapter 15 on arbitration |
|
|
340 | (2) |
|
|
342 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
343 | (36) |
|
|
379 | (16) |
|
|
395 | (6) |
|
|
401 | |