Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Category Neutrality: A Type-Logical Investigation [Kõva köide]

  • Formaat: Hardback, 334 pages, kõrgus x laius: 229x152 mm, kaal: 780 g, 8 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sari: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 20-Dec-2004
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0415970946
  • ISBN-13: 9780415970945
Teised raamatud teemal:
  • Formaat: Hardback, 334 pages, kõrgus x laius: 229x152 mm, kaal: 780 g, 8 Illustrations, black and white
  • Sari: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics
  • Ilmumisaeg: 20-Dec-2004
  • Kirjastus: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0415970946
  • ISBN-13: 9780415970945
Teised raamatud teemal:
"Feature neutrality" is an issue that has received much attention among linguists. For example, consider the sentence, "I have never, and will never, put my name on this document." Here, the verb 'put' acts simultaneously as a past participle (as in "have never put") and a base form (as in "will never put"), and is therefore said to be neutral between the two forms. Similar examples have been found for many languages.
The accepted wisdom is that neutrality is possible only for morphosyntactic features such as verb form, gender, number, declension class-not at the level of gross syntactic category, where the semantic differences are more significant. In other words, it has been claimed that "category neutrality," where a word or phrase is used simultaneously with more than one syntactic category, does not exist. (A famous example is the glaring ungrammaticality of this sentence, in which "can" is used simultaneously as a main verb and auxiliary verb: "I can tuna and get a new job.") In this book, however, Neal Whitman shows that category neutrality does exist in English. This not only challenges the current thinking, but also raises foundational questions about the nature of ambiguity.
List of Illustrations
vii
List of Tables
ix
Acknowledgments xi
Introduction 3(4)
Empirical Background
7(18)
Ambiguity, Vagueness, and Polysemy
7(7)
Category Neutrality
14(11)
Theoretical Background
25(48)
Different Kinds of Categorial Grammars
25(3)
Syntax: The Associative Lambek Calculus
28(11)
Semantics
39(7)
Conjunction and Disjunction Constructors
46(13)
Lexical Issues
59(9)
Other Background
68(3)
Conclusions
71(2)
Category Neutrality and Mixed-Wh Interrogatives
73(52)
Introduction
73(2)
Optional NP-Gap Mixed-Wh Interrogatives
75(29)
Plural-Noun Mixed-Wh Interrogatives
104(16)
Mixed-Wh Interrogatives Without Lexical Neutrality
120(3)
Conclusions
123(2)
Category Neutrality and Verbal Argument Alternations
125(60)
Introduction
125(3)
Previous Analyses of Verbal Dependent Coordinations
128(2)
Coordination of Verbal Adjuncts
130(18)
Coordination of Verbal Complements
148(15)
Coordination of Adjuncts with Complements
163(11)
Excursus: Two Sample Derivations
174(7)
Miscellaneous Alternations
181(2)
Conclusions
183(2)
Category Neutrality and Predicative Phrases
185(50)
Introduction
185(2)
Categories for the Copula, APs, PPs, and NPs
187(9)
Category Neutrality, APs, and PPs
196(13)
Category Neutrality and Noun Phrases
209(17)
Proposed Reasons for Noun Phrases of Category Pr
226(8)
Conclusions
234(1)
Category Neutrality and Adverbial Nouns
235(30)
Introduction
235(3)
Previous Analyses
238(2)
Property 1: Projection of Adverbial NPs
240(9)
Property 2: Heading Non-Wh Adverbial Relative Clauses
249(2)
Interaction of Property 1 and Property 2
251(5)
Category Neutrality
256(7)
Conclusions
263(2)
Conclusion
265(4)
Summary
265(1)
Directions for Further Research
266(1)
Implications
267(2)
Appendix A: Attestations of Mixed-Wh Interrogatives 269(28)
Appendix B: Questionnaire Items 297(8)
Bibliography 305(8)
Index 313
Neil Whitman received his Ph.D. in Linguistics from The Ohio State University in 2002.