Muutke küpsiste eelistusi

Comparative Defamation and Privacy Law [Pehme köide]

Edited by (University of Melbourne)
  • Pehme köide
  • Hind: 40,73 €*
  • * hind on lõplik, st. muud allahindlused enam ei rakendu
  • Tavahind: 54,30 €
  • Säästad 25%
  • Raamatu kohalejõudmiseks kirjastusest kulub orienteeruvalt 3-4 nädalat
  • Kogus:
  • Lisa ostukorvi
  • Tasuta tarne
  • Tellimisaeg 2-4 nädalat
  • Lisa soovinimekirja
Defamation and privacy are now two central issues in media law. While defamation law has long posed concerns for media publications, the emergence of privacy as a legal challenge has been relatively recent in many common law jurisdictions outside the US. A number of jurisdictions have seen recent defamation and privacy law reforms, which have often drawn on, or reacted against, developments elsewhere. This timely book examines topical issues in defamation and privacy law focused on media, journalism and contemporary communication. Aimed at a wide legal audience, it brings together leading and emerging analysts of media law to address current and proposed reforms and the impact of changes in communication environments, and to re-examine basic principles such as harm and free speech. This book will be of interest to all those working on commonwealth or US law, as well as comparative scholars from wider jurisdictions.

Defamation and privacy, major and interrelated issues for law and media, are examined here by experts from common law jurisdictions. Aimed at a wide legal audience, this book will be of interest to all those working on commonwealth or US law, as well as scholars from wider jurisdictions.

Muu info

Leading experts from common law jurisdictions examine defamation and privacy, two major and interrelated issues for law and media.
List of contributors
vii
Acknowledgements ix
1 Defamation and privacy in an era of `more speech'
1(16)
Andrew T. Kenyon
2 `Anyone in any medium'? The scope of Canada's responsible communication defence
17(23)
Hilary Young
3 Ceci n'est pas une pipe: the autopoietic inanity of the single meaning rule
40(18)
Andrew Scott
4 New York Times v. Sullivan at fifty years: defamation in separate orbits
58(24)
David Partlett
5 Defamation and democracy
82(14)
Russell L. Weaver
6 `A reasonable expectation of privacy': a coherent or redundant concept?
96(19)
Eric Barendt
7 Media intrusion into grief: lessons from the Pike River mining disaster
115(21)
N.A. Moreham
Yvette Tinsley
8 Press freedom, the public interest and privacy
136(28)
Gavin Phillipson
9 The Atlantic divide on privacy and free speech
164(35)
Kirsty Hughes
Neil M. Richards
10 The `right to be forgotten' by search engines under data privacy law: a legal and policy analysis of the Costeja decision
199(25)
David Lindsay
11 Privacy for the weak, transparency for the powerful
224(22)
Melissa De Zwart
12 The trouble with dignity
246(19)
Amy Gajda
13 The uncertain landscape of Article 8 of the ECHR: the protection of reputation as a fundamental human right?
265(26)
Tanya Aplin
Jason Bosland
14 Vindicating reputation and privacy
291(18)
David Rolph
15 Divining the dignity torts: a possible future for defamation and privacy
309(22)
Ursula Cheer
16 Reverberations of Sullivan? Considering defamation and privacy law reform
331(23)
Andrew T. Kenyon
Megan Richardson
Bibliography 354(19)
Index 373
Andrew T. Kenyon is Professor of Law and a Director of the Centre for Media and Communications Law at the University of Melbourne.