|
|
xiv | |
|
|
xvi | |
Preface |
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (11) |
|
1.1 Roadblocks to Compositionality |
|
|
1 | (5) |
|
1.2 Finding Our Way in Babylon: Terminological Problems |
|
|
6 | (4) |
|
1.3 A Brief Inspection of the Chapters |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
2 How to Deal with the Long Tradition of Going Ternary? |
|
|
12 | (36) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2.1 The Reichenbachian Matrix in Different Forms |
|
|
13 | (17) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
2.1.2 Three Times 2 × 3 for Dutch |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2.1.3 Reducing 3 × 3 to 7 for English |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
2.1.4 3 × 3 for Classical Greek |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2.1.5 Two Times ((3 × 3) --- 2) for French |
|
|
23 | (7) |
|
2.2 Ternary with Intervals |
|
|
30 | (6) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.2.1 The Present Perfect Puzzle |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Topic Time as a Key for the Solution to the Present Perfect Puzzle |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 A Pragmatic Solution |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
36 | (9) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.3.1 Point of Evaluation |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
2.3.2 A Point as a Landmark |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.3.3 The Fleeting Point n |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
48 | (45) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
3.1 A Brief Survey of Te Winkel's Binary System |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
|
52 | (6) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
3.2.1 Dyadic Branching and Binary Tense |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
3.2.2 Preparing for the Semantics of Binary Operators |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
3.3 The Present Tense Domain |
|
|
58 | (15) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
3.3.1 Distinguishing between Present and the Fleeting point n |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
|
64 | (6) |
|
3.3.4 Taking a Snapshot at n |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
3.3.5 Simple Future and Future Perfect in the Present |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
3.4 The Past Tense Domain |
|
|
73 | (9) |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
3.4.1 Anteriority Seen as a Relation between Two Temporal Structures |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
3.4.4 Simple Future and Future Perfect in the Past |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3.5 A Compositional Account of Tense Structure |
|
|
82 | (9) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3.5.1 Ontological Preliminaries: Events or Indices |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 The Semantics of the Operators pres and past |
|
|
84 | (6) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
4 Naive Physics and Aspectual Composition |
|
|
93 | (38) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
4.1 What Did Aristotle Tell to Ryle, Vendler and Kenny? |
|
|
95 | (11) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
4.1.1 Formal Semantics and Aristotle |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Tense Oppositions in Aristotle's Metaphysics |
|
|
98 | (4) |
|
4.1.3 Translation Problems |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
4.1.4 At the Bottom of the Aristotelian Notion of Motion |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
4.2 On the Idiosyncrasy of Criteria for Aspectual Classification |
|
|
106 | (16) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
4.2.1 Ryle's Criterion for Allowing Achievements: Finis |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
4.2.2 A Binary Alternative to Ryle's Exchangeability Criterion: The Report Mode |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
4.2.3 Vendler's Criteria for a Quadripartition |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
4.2.4 Kenny's Criteria for a Tripartition |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
4.2.5 Monadicity as the Disturbing Factor |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
4.3 Features of Aspectual Composition |
|
|
122 | (6) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
4.3.1 Aspectual Features and Beyond |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
4.3.2 Doing Away with Features |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
|
128 | (3) |
|
5 Levels of Interaction between Aspect and Tense |
|
|
131 | (38) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.1 At the Bottom of a Predication |
|
|
131 | (9) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.1.1 Grounding a Verb Opposition |
|
|
132 | (3) |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
5.2 Discretization and Bounding |
|
|
140 | (16) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
5.2.1 Intransitive Verbs Expressing Discretization |
|
|
140 | (6) |
|
5.2.2 Discretization and Bounding by the Internal Argument of Transitive verbs |
|
|
146 | (4) |
|
5.2.3 Wavering between do su and su |
|
|
150 | (4) |
|
5.2.4 The Role of the External Argument |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
5.3 A Formal Account from Lexical Bottom to Sq |
|
|
156 | (10) |
|
|
156 | (2) |
|
5.3.1 Syntax and Semantics of Noun Phrases |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Discretization in Sentences with Transitive Verbs |
|
|
159 | (5) |
|
5.3.3 Discretization in Sentences with Unaccusatives and Unergatives |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
6 Binary Tense Structure and Adverbial Modification |
|
|
169 | (42) |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
6.1 On the Role of Det and NP in a Temporal Adverbial |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
6.2 Syntax and Semantics of Non-deictic Modification |
|
|
173 | (10) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
6.2.1 The Predominance of Tense over Temporal Modifiers |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Temporal Modification as a Form of Bounding |
|
|
175 | (4) |
|
6.2.3 Connecting a Temporal Modifier to Indices at Different Levels |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
6.2.4 Non-deictic Relational Adverbials |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
6.2.5 Modification below S0 |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
6.3 Frequency and Habituality |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
6.4 Syntax and Semantics of Deictic Modification |
|
|
185 | (11) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
6.4.1 Deictic Setting Adverbials |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
6.4.2 Deictic Relational Adverbials |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 A Structural Solution to the Present Perfect Puzzle |
|
|
189 | (6) |
|
6.4.4 Comparing Solutions |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
6.5 Syntax and Semantics of Durational Adverbials |
|
|
196 | (13) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
6.5.2 Computing the Length of Indices |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
6.5.3 Computing Length at Higher Levels |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
6.5.4 Further Escapes from the in/for-Test |
|
|
205 | (4) |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
7 How to Deal Binarily with ...? |
|
|
211 | (42) |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
7.1 The Semantics of the Progressive Form |
|
|
212 | (9) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
7.1.1 Attempts to Resolve the Alleged Imperfective Paradox |
|
|
212 | (3) |
|
7.1.2 A Binary and Compositional Analysis of the Progressive Form |
|
|
215 | (6) |
|
7.2 Binary Indices, Compositionality and Slavic Aspect |
|
|
221 | (14) |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
7.2.1 PF vs [ +T] and IPF vs [ -t] |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
7.2.2 Dividing PF and IPF between Three Levels |
|
|
226 | (6) |
|
7.2.3 Temporal Definiteness and Indefiniteness |
|
|
232 | (3) |
|
7.2.4 Lexical and Grammatical Aspect |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
7.3 The Position of the Aorist in a Binary System |
|
|
235 | (16) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
7.3.1 The French Passe Simple |
|
|
237 | (5) |
|
7.3.2 The Imperfective and Perfective Aorist in Bulgarian |
|
|
242 | (4) |
|
7.3.3 Comparing Choices in Rich Tense Systems |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
7.3.4 The Aorist and the Third Binary Opposition |
|
|
247 | (4) |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
|
253 | (37) |
|
|
253 | (4) |
|
8.1 On the Nature of the Opposition between SYN and POST |
|
|
257 | (9) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
8.1.1 Existential Quantifiers and Modal Configurations |
|
|
257 | (6) |
|
8.1.2 Indicative vs Subjunctive Mood? |
|
|
263 | (3) |
|
8.2 Modality and Future: Linguistics or Philosophy? |
|
|
266 | (13) |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
8.2.1 The Seabattle Tomorrow |
|
|
266 | (3) |
|
8.2.2 Ockham or Peirce, Prior or Te Winkel? |
|
|
269 | (4) |
|
8.2.3 Modal Base and Accessibility |
|
|
273 | (3) |
|
8.2.4 Adapting the Connectives Introduced by SYN and POST |
|
|
276 | (3) |
|
8.3 The Proof of the Modal Pudding ... |
|
|
279 | (8) |
|
8.4 Reaching the Top: Temporalization by PRES and PAST |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
|
288 | (2) |
Appendix |
|
290 | (11) |
Bibliography |
|
301 | (20) |
Author Index |
|
321 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
325 | |